Beyond Citizen and Subject: New Perspectives on Political Thought, 'Tribe' and 'Indirect Rule' in Africa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite the extensive literature on ‘tribe’ and ‘indirect rule’ in colonial Africa, historians have tended to confine their analyses to the economic and administrative pragmatism of empire-builders, the domination of colonial knowledge, and the mediation of these factors by African culture-brokers who brandished local ‘tradition’ in order to satisfy a range of local material interests. This essay shows that these arguments replicate colonial views which bifurcated Africa into incommensurable spheres of ‘modern’ European agency and ‘traditional’ African response. Placing the existing scholarship of African colonial history in dialogue with Indian intellectual history and African film studies, I propose that dyadic understandings of ‘tribe’ and ‘indirect rule’ can be
overcome in order to re-position Africa and its institutions at the heart of a global narrative of ‘modernisation’. In considering this new perspective, the essay invites students and scholars of African history and political science to recognise that - for some – ‘tribe’ was a constituent part of a uniquely African vision of future progress rather than a pre-modern anachronism or a tool of Western epistemological dominance.
LanguageEnglish
JournalHistory Compass
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 7 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Tribes
Africa
Indirect Rule
Political Thought
Colonies
Pragmatism
Political Science
Broker
Mediation
Modernization
History Film
Builders
African Culture
Epistemological
Film Studies
Local Traditions
African History
Domination
Colonial History
Economics

Cite this

@article{23787ec19436463f8b1dd5cd6bf7c6ea,
title = "Beyond Citizen and Subject: New Perspectives on Political Thought, 'Tribe' and 'Indirect Rule' in Africa",
abstract = "Despite the extensive literature on ‘tribe’ and ‘indirect rule’ in colonial Africa, historians have tended to confine their analyses to the economic and administrative pragmatism of empire-builders, the domination of colonial knowledge, and the mediation of these factors by African culture-brokers who brandished local ‘tradition’ in order to satisfy a range of local material interests. This essay shows that these arguments replicate colonial views which bifurcated Africa into incommensurable spheres of ‘modern’ European agency and ‘traditional’ African response. Placing the existing scholarship of African colonial history in dialogue with Indian intellectual history and African film studies, I propose that dyadic understandings of ‘tribe’ and ‘indirect rule’ can beovercome in order to re-position Africa and its institutions at the heart of a global narrative of ‘modernisation’. In considering this new perspective, the essay invites students and scholars of African history and political science to recognise that - for some – ‘tribe’ was a constituent part of a uniquely African vision of future progress rather than a pre-modern anachronism or a tool of Western epistemological dominance.",
keywords = "Africa, tribes, indirect rule, colonial history, intellectual history, film studies",
author = "Vikram Visana",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "7",
language = "English",
journal = "History Compass",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Citizen and Subject

T2 - History Compass

AU - Visana, Vikram

PY - 2019/1/7

Y1 - 2019/1/7

N2 - Despite the extensive literature on ‘tribe’ and ‘indirect rule’ in colonial Africa, historians have tended to confine their analyses to the economic and administrative pragmatism of empire-builders, the domination of colonial knowledge, and the mediation of these factors by African culture-brokers who brandished local ‘tradition’ in order to satisfy a range of local material interests. This essay shows that these arguments replicate colonial views which bifurcated Africa into incommensurable spheres of ‘modern’ European agency and ‘traditional’ African response. Placing the existing scholarship of African colonial history in dialogue with Indian intellectual history and African film studies, I propose that dyadic understandings of ‘tribe’ and ‘indirect rule’ can beovercome in order to re-position Africa and its institutions at the heart of a global narrative of ‘modernisation’. In considering this new perspective, the essay invites students and scholars of African history and political science to recognise that - for some – ‘tribe’ was a constituent part of a uniquely African vision of future progress rather than a pre-modern anachronism or a tool of Western epistemological dominance.

AB - Despite the extensive literature on ‘tribe’ and ‘indirect rule’ in colonial Africa, historians have tended to confine their analyses to the economic and administrative pragmatism of empire-builders, the domination of colonial knowledge, and the mediation of these factors by African culture-brokers who brandished local ‘tradition’ in order to satisfy a range of local material interests. This essay shows that these arguments replicate colonial views which bifurcated Africa into incommensurable spheres of ‘modern’ European agency and ‘traditional’ African response. Placing the existing scholarship of African colonial history in dialogue with Indian intellectual history and African film studies, I propose that dyadic understandings of ‘tribe’ and ‘indirect rule’ can beovercome in order to re-position Africa and its institutions at the heart of a global narrative of ‘modernisation’. In considering this new perspective, the essay invites students and scholars of African history and political science to recognise that - for some – ‘tribe’ was a constituent part of a uniquely African vision of future progress rather than a pre-modern anachronism or a tool of Western epistemological dominance.

KW - Africa

KW - tribes

KW - indirect rule

KW - colonial history

KW - intellectual history

KW - film studies

M3 - Article

JO - History Compass

JF - History Compass

ER -