Beyond Decisions About a Child and Decisions Affecting a Child in Deportation Cases

Jonathan Collinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Who should be central to the determination of deportation decisions: parent or child? The state claims an interest in enforcing immigration control by removing the adult. The child, on the other hand, has an interest in maintaining their relationships with both of their parents, as well as the practical and cultural benefits of growing up in the country of their nationality or habitual residence. How to decide between these competing claims is of practical and theoretical importance in human rights determinations under Article 8 ECHR and Article 3 UNCRC. This article investigates the theoretical distinction which is drawn between decisions about and child and decisions affecting a child, and argues that this approach is problematic. Firstly, Article 8 ECHR is an incomplete vehicle for determining the best interests of the child. Secondly, it reinforces the ‘problematic logical inversion’ found in the European Court of Human Right’s migration jurisprudence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)703-728
Number of pages26
JournalInternational Journal of Children's Rights
Issue number3
Early online date22 Aug 2022
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2022


Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond Decisions About a Child and Decisions Affecting a Child in Deportation Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this