Beyond NEET: Precariousness, Ideology and Social Justice – the 99%

James Avis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article addresses NEET (not in employment, education or training) as an ideological and discursive formation, lodging the discussion within its socio-economic context – one of increasing insecurity and precariousness. It argues that frequently quasi-political and ideological constructions of NEET can readily fold over into and articulate with discourses of the underclass and the broken society, as well as, paradoxically, social recession. Consequently, such arguments divert attention from processes of ‘othering’ and the secular changes facing society, as well as the spectre of a return to a form of nineteenth-century liberalism. Although the argument is located within the English context, it has a relevance to other Western societies in which similar tendencies can be discerned.
LanguageEnglish
Pages61-72
Number of pages12
JournalPower and Education
Volume6
Issue number1
Early online date1 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

precariousness
social justice
ideology
liberalism
recession
education
nineteenth century
discourse
society
economics
Society

Cite this

@article{f6032b42865d423494255ea73758a214,
title = "Beyond NEET: Precariousness, Ideology and Social Justice – the 99{\%}",
abstract = "This article addresses NEET (not in employment, education or training) as an ideological and discursive formation, lodging the discussion within its socio-economic context – one of increasing insecurity and precariousness. It argues that frequently quasi-political and ideological constructions of NEET can readily fold over into and articulate with discourses of the underclass and the broken society, as well as, paradoxically, social recession. Consequently, such arguments divert attention from processes of ‘othering’ and the secular changes facing society, as well as the spectre of a return to a form of nineteenth-century liberalism. Although the argument is located within the English context, it has a relevance to other Western societies in which similar tendencies can be discerned.",
keywords = "NEET, NEET young people, Socio-economic, othering",
author = "James Avis",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2304/power.2014.6.1.61",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "61--72",
journal = "Power and Education",
issn = "1757-7438",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Beyond NEET : Precariousness, Ideology and Social Justice – the 99%. / Avis, James.

In: Power and Education, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.03.2014, p. 61-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond NEET

T2 - Power and Education

AU - Avis, James

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - This article addresses NEET (not in employment, education or training) as an ideological and discursive formation, lodging the discussion within its socio-economic context – one of increasing insecurity and precariousness. It argues that frequently quasi-political and ideological constructions of NEET can readily fold over into and articulate with discourses of the underclass and the broken society, as well as, paradoxically, social recession. Consequently, such arguments divert attention from processes of ‘othering’ and the secular changes facing society, as well as the spectre of a return to a form of nineteenth-century liberalism. Although the argument is located within the English context, it has a relevance to other Western societies in which similar tendencies can be discerned.

AB - This article addresses NEET (not in employment, education or training) as an ideological and discursive formation, lodging the discussion within its socio-economic context – one of increasing insecurity and precariousness. It argues that frequently quasi-political and ideological constructions of NEET can readily fold over into and articulate with discourses of the underclass and the broken society, as well as, paradoxically, social recession. Consequently, such arguments divert attention from processes of ‘othering’ and the secular changes facing society, as well as the spectre of a return to a form of nineteenth-century liberalism. Although the argument is located within the English context, it has a relevance to other Western societies in which similar tendencies can be discerned.

KW - NEET

KW - NEET young people

KW - Socio-economic

KW - othering

U2 - 10.2304/power.2014.6.1.61

DO - 10.2304/power.2014.6.1.61

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 61

EP - 72

JO - Power and Education

JF - Power and Education

SN - 1757-7438

IS - 1

ER -