Beyond Referendums and ‘Austerity’

Public Participation Policy Enactment in ‘new’ UK Governance Spaces

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article generates new insights into what contributes to the effective enactment of public participation policy. It critiques the implementation of recent public participation policy in the UK, focusing on new local governance spaces created in England by Labour governments (1997-2010), and arrangements subsequently enacted under the Coalition and Conservative governments (2010-2017). It reports on a study conducted in 22 local authority areas in one English region, exploring public participation practices in Local Strategic Partnerships, and again seven years after the policy was rescinded. Power and agency feature in the analysis, which demonstrates how the intended impacts of public participation policy is diluted by complex context-specific organisational, cultural and professional factors. The article presents evidence of citizens' continuing enthusiasm to shape and influence policy, through formal structures and non-traditional processes, and argues that public participation policy during 'austerity' should accommodate the potential for progressive outcomes to emerge from both approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-224
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Public Policy
Volume15
Issue number3/4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

referendum
governance
participation
coalition
labor
citizen
evidence

Cite this

@article{be38d46d92a24feda20251b354e8c239,
title = "Beyond Referendums and ‘Austerity’: Public Participation Policy Enactment in ‘new’ UK Governance Spaces",
abstract = "This article generates new insights into what contributes to the effective enactment of public participation policy. It critiques the implementation of recent public participation policy in the UK, focusing on new local governance spaces created in England by Labour governments (1997-2010), and arrangements subsequently enacted under the Coalition and Conservative governments (2010-2017). It reports on a study conducted in 22 local authority areas in one English region, exploring public participation practices in Local Strategic Partnerships, and again seven years after the policy was rescinded. Power and agency feature in the analysis, which demonstrates how the intended impacts of public participation policy is diluted by complex context-specific organisational, cultural and professional factors. The article presents evidence of citizens' continuing enthusiasm to shape and influence policy, through formal structures and non-traditional processes, and argues that public participation policy during 'austerity' should accommodate the potential for progressive outcomes to emerge from both approaches.",
keywords = "Policy enactment, Public participation, Community Development, Local governance, Community development, UK",
author = "Martin Purcell",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1504/IJPP.2019.103026",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "206--224",
journal = "International Journal of Public Policy",
issn = "1740-0600",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "3/4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Referendums and ‘Austerity’

T2 - Public Participation Policy Enactment in ‘new’ UK Governance Spaces

AU - Purcell, Martin

PY - 2019/10/11

Y1 - 2019/10/11

N2 - This article generates new insights into what contributes to the effective enactment of public participation policy. It critiques the implementation of recent public participation policy in the UK, focusing on new local governance spaces created in England by Labour governments (1997-2010), and arrangements subsequently enacted under the Coalition and Conservative governments (2010-2017). It reports on a study conducted in 22 local authority areas in one English region, exploring public participation practices in Local Strategic Partnerships, and again seven years after the policy was rescinded. Power and agency feature in the analysis, which demonstrates how the intended impacts of public participation policy is diluted by complex context-specific organisational, cultural and professional factors. The article presents evidence of citizens' continuing enthusiasm to shape and influence policy, through formal structures and non-traditional processes, and argues that public participation policy during 'austerity' should accommodate the potential for progressive outcomes to emerge from both approaches.

AB - This article generates new insights into what contributes to the effective enactment of public participation policy. It critiques the implementation of recent public participation policy in the UK, focusing on new local governance spaces created in England by Labour governments (1997-2010), and arrangements subsequently enacted under the Coalition and Conservative governments (2010-2017). It reports on a study conducted in 22 local authority areas in one English region, exploring public participation practices in Local Strategic Partnerships, and again seven years after the policy was rescinded. Power and agency feature in the analysis, which demonstrates how the intended impacts of public participation policy is diluted by complex context-specific organisational, cultural and professional factors. The article presents evidence of citizens' continuing enthusiasm to shape and influence policy, through formal structures and non-traditional processes, and argues that public participation policy during 'austerity' should accommodate the potential for progressive outcomes to emerge from both approaches.

KW - Policy enactment

KW - Public participation

KW - Community Development

KW - Local governance

KW - Community development

KW - UK

UR - https://www.inderscience.com/info/inarticletoc.php?jcode=ijpp&year=2018&vol=14&issue=5/6

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073546681&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJPP.2019.103026

DO - 10.1504/IJPP.2019.103026

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 206

EP - 224

JO - International Journal of Public Policy

JF - International Journal of Public Policy

SN - 1740-0600

IS - 3/4

ER -