TY - JOUR
T1 - Blue-space availability, environmental quality and amenity use across contrasting socioeconomic contexts
AU - Thornhill, I.
AU - Hill, M. J.
AU - Castro-Castellon, A.
AU - Gurung, H.
AU - Hobbs, S.
AU - Pineda-Vazquez, M.
AU - Gómez-Osorio, M. T.
AU - Hernández-Avilés, J. S.
AU - Novo, P.
AU - Mesa-Jurado, A.
AU - Calderon-Contreras, R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was a part of the RESPiRES project,which was funded by UK Research and Innovation Newton Fund (the Economic andSocial Research Council; ES/S006443/1) and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia yTecnología (CONACyT).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - Over 60% of the global population are expected to live in urban areas by 2050. Urban blue spaces are critical for biodiversity, provide a range of ecosystem services, and can promote human health and wellbeing. Despite this, access to blue space is often unequally distributed across socioeconomic gradients, and the availability of quality blue space could extend to environmental justice issues. Three stages of analysis were carried out in Mexico City, Mexico and Bristol, UK to (i) assess associations between blue space and socioeconomic metrics at a regional scale, (ii) apply a rapid assessment tool to assess amenity, access and environmental quality, (iii) consider local quality across socioeconomic gradients at a regional scale. Still water availability was indicative of higher socioeconomic status, but contrasting city evolutions underpinned differences. Locally, there were environmental gradients from more complex to disturbed habitats that influenced potential wellbeing and amenity benefits. In combination, this may exacerbate inequalities and risk increasing ecosystem disservices. If cities are to be socially, and environmentally resilient to higher levels of disturbance in the future, healthy ecosystems will be key. However, further research is needed to address various dimensions of injustice in urban areas beyond blue space distribution.
AB - Over 60% of the global population are expected to live in urban areas by 2050. Urban blue spaces are critical for biodiversity, provide a range of ecosystem services, and can promote human health and wellbeing. Despite this, access to blue space is often unequally distributed across socioeconomic gradients, and the availability of quality blue space could extend to environmental justice issues. Three stages of analysis were carried out in Mexico City, Mexico and Bristol, UK to (i) assess associations between blue space and socioeconomic metrics at a regional scale, (ii) apply a rapid assessment tool to assess amenity, access and environmental quality, (iii) consider local quality across socioeconomic gradients at a regional scale. Still water availability was indicative of higher socioeconomic status, but contrasting city evolutions underpinned differences. Locally, there were environmental gradients from more complex to disturbed habitats that influenced potential wellbeing and amenity benefits. In combination, this may exacerbate inequalities and risk increasing ecosystem disservices. If cities are to be socially, and environmentally resilient to higher levels of disturbance in the future, healthy ecosystems will be key. However, further research is needed to address various dimensions of injustice in urban areas beyond blue space distribution.
KW - Blue spaces
KW - Freshwater distribution
KW - Freshwater network
KW - Habitat quality
KW - Urban landscapes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131407577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102716
DO - 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102716
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85131407577
VL - 144
JO - Applied Geography
JF - Applied Geography
SN - 0143-6228
M1 - 102716
ER -