Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Boundary objects are entities that enhance the capacity of an idea, theory or practice to translate across culturally defined boundaries, for example, between communities of knowledge or practice. This concept thus has potential to both explain and predict technology adoption; however, it remains sociologically under-theorized. This article assesses, by recourse to a historical case study of innovations in surgical sterility, how boundary objects work and their relationship to social meanings within communities of practice. It is concluded that not only are there positive and negative boundary objects, but that technological devices or processes may themselves act as facilitative or inhibitory boundary objects during innovation. The approach set out here has potential as a sociologically informed model of improving adoption of technologies and policies by managing the positive and negative social meanings of technology objects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-85
Number of pages16
JournalSociology
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

new technology
innovation
recourse
community

Cite this

@article{011517bb772b4088bf5c0deb4a903361,
title = "Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies",
abstract = "Boundary objects are entities that enhance the capacity of an idea, theory or practice to translate across culturally defined boundaries, for example, between communities of knowledge or practice. This concept thus has potential to both explain and predict technology adoption; however, it remains sociologically under-theorized. This article assesses, by recourse to a historical case study of innovations in surgical sterility, how boundary objects work and their relationship to social meanings within communities of practice. It is concluded that not only are there positive and negative boundary objects, but that technological devices or processes may themselves act as facilitative or inhibitory boundary objects during innovation. The approach set out here has potential as a sociologically informed model of improving adoption of technologies and policies by managing the positive and negative social meanings of technology objects.",
keywords = "boundary object, community of practice, innovation, medicine, technology",
author = "Fox, {Nick J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0038038510387196",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "70--85",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies. / Fox, Nick J.

In: Sociology, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.02.2011, p. 70-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies

AU - Fox, Nick J.

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Boundary objects are entities that enhance the capacity of an idea, theory or practice to translate across culturally defined boundaries, for example, between communities of knowledge or practice. This concept thus has potential to both explain and predict technology adoption; however, it remains sociologically under-theorized. This article assesses, by recourse to a historical case study of innovations in surgical sterility, how boundary objects work and their relationship to social meanings within communities of practice. It is concluded that not only are there positive and negative boundary objects, but that technological devices or processes may themselves act as facilitative or inhibitory boundary objects during innovation. The approach set out here has potential as a sociologically informed model of improving adoption of technologies and policies by managing the positive and negative social meanings of technology objects.

AB - Boundary objects are entities that enhance the capacity of an idea, theory or practice to translate across culturally defined boundaries, for example, between communities of knowledge or practice. This concept thus has potential to both explain and predict technology adoption; however, it remains sociologically under-theorized. This article assesses, by recourse to a historical case study of innovations in surgical sterility, how boundary objects work and their relationship to social meanings within communities of practice. It is concluded that not only are there positive and negative boundary objects, but that technological devices or processes may themselves act as facilitative or inhibitory boundary objects during innovation. The approach set out here has potential as a sociologically informed model of improving adoption of technologies and policies by managing the positive and negative social meanings of technology objects.

KW - boundary object

KW - community of practice

KW - innovation

KW - medicine

KW - technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551633904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0038038510387196

DO - 10.1177/0038038510387196

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 70

EP - 85

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 1

ER -