British Citizenship and the Legacy of Empires

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Labour government has acknowledged the 'enormous bonds of commonality' (T. Blair, speech to Commonwealth Heads of Government, 24 October 1997. http://www.thecommonwealth.org), but the former empire or the modern Commonwealth has remained largely absent in the re-articulation of Britishness. Although there has been little attempt to reform the institutions and symbols of Empire, transnational ties with its former empire remain predominantly defined by ambiguity and selective myopia. This article will explore the relationship between former empire, British state and its composite nations by examining continued transnational constitutional and governmental ties and its implications on post-imperial frameworks of citizenship. The article will also consider the absence of empire or Commonwealth on the current debates concerning the 'Politics of Britishness' and how devolution has redefined post-imperialism across the UK. Finally, the article will assess in what ways the enduring legacy of empire may continue to influence the seemingly perpetual search for a homogenous sense of 'Britishness'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-355
Number of pages17
JournalParliamentary Affairs
Volume63
Issue number2
Early online date23 Sep 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2010

Fingerprint

citizenship
imperialism
decentralization
symbol
labor
reform
politics

Cite this

@article{f79fa721961e42bf8a26f7ae51c1b070,
title = "British Citizenship and the Legacy of Empires",
abstract = "The Labour government has acknowledged the 'enormous bonds of commonality' (T. Blair, speech to Commonwealth Heads of Government, 24 October 1997. http://www.thecommonwealth.org), but the former empire or the modern Commonwealth has remained largely absent in the re-articulation of Britishness. Although there has been little attempt to reform the institutions and symbols of Empire, transnational ties with its former empire remain predominantly defined by ambiguity and selective myopia. This article will explore the relationship between former empire, British state and its composite nations by examining continued transnational constitutional and governmental ties and its implications on post-imperial frameworks of citizenship. The article will also consider the absence of empire or Commonwealth on the current debates concerning the 'Politics of Britishness' and how devolution has redefined post-imperialism across the UK. Finally, the article will assess in what ways the enduring legacy of empire may continue to influence the seemingly perpetual search for a homogenous sense of 'Britishness'.",
keywords = "Planning agent, Great Britain, Local economic",
author = "Andrew Mycock",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/pa/gsp035",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "339--355",
journal = "Parliamentary Affairs",
issn = "0031-2290",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

British Citizenship and the Legacy of Empires. / Mycock, Andrew.

In: Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 63, No. 2, 01.04.2010, p. 339-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - British Citizenship and the Legacy of Empires

AU - Mycock, Andrew

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - The Labour government has acknowledged the 'enormous bonds of commonality' (T. Blair, speech to Commonwealth Heads of Government, 24 October 1997. http://www.thecommonwealth.org), but the former empire or the modern Commonwealth has remained largely absent in the re-articulation of Britishness. Although there has been little attempt to reform the institutions and symbols of Empire, transnational ties with its former empire remain predominantly defined by ambiguity and selective myopia. This article will explore the relationship between former empire, British state and its composite nations by examining continued transnational constitutional and governmental ties and its implications on post-imperial frameworks of citizenship. The article will also consider the absence of empire or Commonwealth on the current debates concerning the 'Politics of Britishness' and how devolution has redefined post-imperialism across the UK. Finally, the article will assess in what ways the enduring legacy of empire may continue to influence the seemingly perpetual search for a homogenous sense of 'Britishness'.

AB - The Labour government has acknowledged the 'enormous bonds of commonality' (T. Blair, speech to Commonwealth Heads of Government, 24 October 1997. http://www.thecommonwealth.org), but the former empire or the modern Commonwealth has remained largely absent in the re-articulation of Britishness. Although there has been little attempt to reform the institutions and symbols of Empire, transnational ties with its former empire remain predominantly defined by ambiguity and selective myopia. This article will explore the relationship between former empire, British state and its composite nations by examining continued transnational constitutional and governmental ties and its implications on post-imperial frameworks of citizenship. The article will also consider the absence of empire or Commonwealth on the current debates concerning the 'Politics of Britishness' and how devolution has redefined post-imperialism across the UK. Finally, the article will assess in what ways the enduring legacy of empire may continue to influence the seemingly perpetual search for a homogenous sense of 'Britishness'.

KW - Planning agent

KW - Great Britain

KW - Local economic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950259339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/pa/gsp035

DO - 10.1093/pa/gsp035

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77950259339

VL - 63

SP - 339

EP - 355

JO - Parliamentary Affairs

JF - Parliamentary Affairs

SN - 0031-2290

IS - 2

ER -