Camera-to-subject distance affects face configuration and perceived identity

Eilidh Noyes, Rob Jenkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Face identification is reliable for viewers who are familiar with the face, and unreliable for viewers who are not. One account of this contrast is that people become good at recognising a face by learning its configuration-the specific pattern of feature-to-feature measurements. In practice, these measurements differ across photos of the same face because objects appear more flat or convex depending on their distance from the camera. Here we connect this optical understanding to face configuration and identification accuracy. Changing camera-to-subject distance (0.32m versus 2.70m) impaired perceptual matching of unfamiliar faces, even though the images were presented at the same size. Familiar face matching was accurate across conditions. Reinstating valid distance cues mitigated the performance cost, suggesting that perceptual constancy compensates for distance-related changes in optical face shape. Acknowledging these distance effects could reduce identification errors in applied settings such as passport control.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-104
Number of pages8
JournalCognition
Volume165
Early online date17 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

costs
learning
performance
Cues
Learning
Costs and Cost Analysis
Viewer
Optical
Costs

Cite this

@article{7e5d8a75fe8d4549b281a53cec02550c,
title = "Camera-to-subject distance affects face configuration and perceived identity",
abstract = "Face identification is reliable for viewers who are familiar with the face, and unreliable for viewers who are not. One account of this contrast is that people become good at recognising a face by learning its configuration-the specific pattern of feature-to-feature measurements. In practice, these measurements differ across photos of the same face because objects appear more flat or convex depending on their distance from the camera. Here we connect this optical understanding to face configuration and identification accuracy. Changing camera-to-subject distance (0.32m versus 2.70m) impaired perceptual matching of unfamiliar faces, even though the images were presented at the same size. Familiar face matching was accurate across conditions. Reinstating valid distance cues mitigated the performance cost, suggesting that perceptual constancy compensates for distance-related changes in optical face shape. Acknowledging these distance effects could reduce identification errors in applied settings such as passport control.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Cues, Facial Recognition, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Recognition (Psychology), Young Adult",
author = "Eilidh Noyes and Rob Jenkins",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.012",
language = "English",
volume = "165",
pages = "97--104",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Camera-to-subject distance affects face configuration and perceived identity. / Noyes, Eilidh; Jenkins, Rob.

In: Cognition, Vol. 165, 08.2017, p. 97-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Camera-to-subject distance affects face configuration and perceived identity

AU - Noyes, Eilidh

AU - Jenkins, Rob

N1 - Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Face identification is reliable for viewers who are familiar with the face, and unreliable for viewers who are not. One account of this contrast is that people become good at recognising a face by learning its configuration-the specific pattern of feature-to-feature measurements. In practice, these measurements differ across photos of the same face because objects appear more flat or convex depending on their distance from the camera. Here we connect this optical understanding to face configuration and identification accuracy. Changing camera-to-subject distance (0.32m versus 2.70m) impaired perceptual matching of unfamiliar faces, even though the images were presented at the same size. Familiar face matching was accurate across conditions. Reinstating valid distance cues mitigated the performance cost, suggesting that perceptual constancy compensates for distance-related changes in optical face shape. Acknowledging these distance effects could reduce identification errors in applied settings such as passport control.

AB - Face identification is reliable for viewers who are familiar with the face, and unreliable for viewers who are not. One account of this contrast is that people become good at recognising a face by learning its configuration-the specific pattern of feature-to-feature measurements. In practice, these measurements differ across photos of the same face because objects appear more flat or convex depending on their distance from the camera. Here we connect this optical understanding to face configuration and identification accuracy. Changing camera-to-subject distance (0.32m versus 2.70m) impaired perceptual matching of unfamiliar faces, even though the images were presented at the same size. Familiar face matching was accurate across conditions. Reinstating valid distance cues mitigated the performance cost, suggesting that perceptual constancy compensates for distance-related changes in optical face shape. Acknowledging these distance effects could reduce identification errors in applied settings such as passport control.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Cues

KW - Facial Recognition

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Photic Stimulation

KW - Recognition (Psychology)

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.012

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.012

M3 - Article

VL - 165

SP - 97

EP - 104

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

ER -