Carer and mental health professional views of a psychosocial treatment for negative symptoms in psychosis: A qualitative study

Hilary Mairs, Karina Lovell, Philip Keeley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Trials of complex interventions should be preceded by in-depth piloting of the treatment in order to ensure clear definition of critical components and establish feasibility and acceptability. Objectives: This study aimed to elicit views of extending behavioural activation, an evidence-based treatment for depression, to the negative symptoms observed in psychosis from the perspectives of carers of people with mental health problems and mental health professionals. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work and carer support organisation, North West of England, United Kingdom. Participants: Fifteen participants were recruited from a local carer support group. Nineteen mental health professionals were recruited from post-registration university based programmes. Methods: We used focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis using a constant comparative approach was employed to capture key concepts and themes. Results: There was support for behavioural activation for negative symptoms in psychosis from some mental health workers and many of the carers; however both groups identified barriers to its implementation. Professionals highlighted internal factors, the difficulty in engaging people with negative symptoms in psychosocial treatments and services more broadly while carers identified a number of external, practical barriers. For those who saw some utility in the treatment approach, the benefit of expanding the treatment to include community based sessions as well as formal behavioural activation meetings were recognised. However, a number of mental health professionals remained sceptical as to its potential to reduce negative symptoms. Professional and carer views generally concurred in relation to family involvement, indicating that restricted engagement could be helpful, but that further participation might actually be counterproductive. Conclusions: Acceptability for many carers and some professionals was evident and support further evaluation of behavioural activation for negative symptoms. Significant issues to be addressed include the balance of formal talking based sessions and community based sessions to support activation for people with negative symptoms and mental health professional pessimism in relation to this symptom cluster. The current study supports the phased development and careful piloting of complex healthcare interventions before progression to large scale evaluation.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1191-1199
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume49
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychotic Disorders
Caregivers
Mental Health
Therapeutics
School Nursing
Self-Help Groups
Midwifery
Focus Groups
Social Work
England
Organizations
Interviews
Depression
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

@article{cc28b5174dc944a9897fa0fe4b7974fc,
title = "Carer and mental health professional views of a psychosocial treatment for negative symptoms in psychosis: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: Trials of complex interventions should be preceded by in-depth piloting of the treatment in order to ensure clear definition of critical components and establish feasibility and acceptability. Objectives: This study aimed to elicit views of extending behavioural activation, an evidence-based treatment for depression, to the negative symptoms observed in psychosis from the perspectives of carers of people with mental health problems and mental health professionals. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work and carer support organisation, North West of England, United Kingdom. Participants: Fifteen participants were recruited from a local carer support group. Nineteen mental health professionals were recruited from post-registration university based programmes. Methods: We used focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis using a constant comparative approach was employed to capture key concepts and themes. Results: There was support for behavioural activation for negative symptoms in psychosis from some mental health workers and many of the carers; however both groups identified barriers to its implementation. Professionals highlighted internal factors, the difficulty in engaging people with negative symptoms in psychosocial treatments and services more broadly while carers identified a number of external, practical barriers. For those who saw some utility in the treatment approach, the benefit of expanding the treatment to include community based sessions as well as formal behavioural activation meetings were recognised. However, a number of mental health professionals remained sceptical as to its potential to reduce negative symptoms. Professional and carer views generally concurred in relation to family involvement, indicating that restricted engagement could be helpful, but that further participation might actually be counterproductive. Conclusions: Acceptability for many carers and some professionals was evident and support further evaluation of behavioural activation for negative symptoms. Significant issues to be addressed include the balance of formal talking based sessions and community based sessions to support activation for people with negative symptoms and mental health professional pessimism in relation to this symptom cluster. The current study supports the phased development and careful piloting of complex healthcare interventions before progression to large scale evaluation.",
keywords = "Behavioural activation, Carers, Focus groups, Mental health professionals, Negative symptoms, Perspectives",
author = "Hilary Mairs and Karina Lovell and Philip Keeley",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.04.006",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1191--1199",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

Carer and mental health professional views of a psychosocial treatment for negative symptoms in psychosis : A qualitative study. / Mairs, Hilary; Lovell, Karina; Keeley, Philip.

In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 49, No. 10, 01.10.2012, p. 1191-1199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carer and mental health professional views of a psychosocial treatment for negative symptoms in psychosis

T2 - International Journal of Nursing Studies

AU - Mairs, Hilary

AU - Lovell, Karina

AU - Keeley, Philip

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Background: Trials of complex interventions should be preceded by in-depth piloting of the treatment in order to ensure clear definition of critical components and establish feasibility and acceptability. Objectives: This study aimed to elicit views of extending behavioural activation, an evidence-based treatment for depression, to the negative symptoms observed in psychosis from the perspectives of carers of people with mental health problems and mental health professionals. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work and carer support organisation, North West of England, United Kingdom. Participants: Fifteen participants were recruited from a local carer support group. Nineteen mental health professionals were recruited from post-registration university based programmes. Methods: We used focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis using a constant comparative approach was employed to capture key concepts and themes. Results: There was support for behavioural activation for negative symptoms in psychosis from some mental health workers and many of the carers; however both groups identified barriers to its implementation. Professionals highlighted internal factors, the difficulty in engaging people with negative symptoms in psychosocial treatments and services more broadly while carers identified a number of external, practical barriers. For those who saw some utility in the treatment approach, the benefit of expanding the treatment to include community based sessions as well as formal behavioural activation meetings were recognised. However, a number of mental health professionals remained sceptical as to its potential to reduce negative symptoms. Professional and carer views generally concurred in relation to family involvement, indicating that restricted engagement could be helpful, but that further participation might actually be counterproductive. Conclusions: Acceptability for many carers and some professionals was evident and support further evaluation of behavioural activation for negative symptoms. Significant issues to be addressed include the balance of formal talking based sessions and community based sessions to support activation for people with negative symptoms and mental health professional pessimism in relation to this symptom cluster. The current study supports the phased development and careful piloting of complex healthcare interventions before progression to large scale evaluation.

AB - Background: Trials of complex interventions should be preceded by in-depth piloting of the treatment in order to ensure clear definition of critical components and establish feasibility and acceptability. Objectives: This study aimed to elicit views of extending behavioural activation, an evidence-based treatment for depression, to the negative symptoms observed in psychosis from the perspectives of carers of people with mental health problems and mental health professionals. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work and carer support organisation, North West of England, United Kingdom. Participants: Fifteen participants were recruited from a local carer support group. Nineteen mental health professionals were recruited from post-registration university based programmes. Methods: We used focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis using a constant comparative approach was employed to capture key concepts and themes. Results: There was support for behavioural activation for negative symptoms in psychosis from some mental health workers and many of the carers; however both groups identified barriers to its implementation. Professionals highlighted internal factors, the difficulty in engaging people with negative symptoms in psychosocial treatments and services more broadly while carers identified a number of external, practical barriers. For those who saw some utility in the treatment approach, the benefit of expanding the treatment to include community based sessions as well as formal behavioural activation meetings were recognised. However, a number of mental health professionals remained sceptical as to its potential to reduce negative symptoms. Professional and carer views generally concurred in relation to family involvement, indicating that restricted engagement could be helpful, but that further participation might actually be counterproductive. Conclusions: Acceptability for many carers and some professionals was evident and support further evaluation of behavioural activation for negative symptoms. Significant issues to be addressed include the balance of formal talking based sessions and community based sessions to support activation for people with negative symptoms and mental health professional pessimism in relation to this symptom cluster. The current study supports the phased development and careful piloting of complex healthcare interventions before progression to large scale evaluation.

KW - Behavioural activation

KW - Carers

KW - Focus groups

KW - Mental health professionals

KW - Negative symptoms

KW - Perspectives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866948583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.04.006

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1191

EP - 1199

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

IS - 10

ER -