Case Note: Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In May 2012 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held – reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeal – that the owners of a time-chartered ship were entitled to payment for its continued use by a charterer after lawful withdrawal of the vessel for non-payment of hire. The central question, leading to the different outcome between the courts, was the effect of the decision to withdraw being at the owners’ own election and for commercial purposes.
LanguageEnglish
JournalBusiness Law International
Volume14
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

withdrawal
Supreme Court
appeal
election
time

Cite this

@article{82aa83caec47444ea115dbf0b5c9d416,
title = "Case Note: Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd",
abstract = "In May 2012 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held – reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeal – that the owners of a time-chartered ship were entitled to payment for its continued use by a charterer after lawful withdrawal of the vessel for non-payment of hire. The central question, leading to the different outcome between the courts, was the effect of the decision to withdraw being at the owners’ own election and for commercial purposes.",
author = "Rebecca Kelly",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Business Law International",
number = "1",

}

Case Note : Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd. / Kelly, Rebecca.

In: Business Law International, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case Note

T2 - Business Law International

AU - Kelly, Rebecca

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - In May 2012 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held – reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeal – that the owners of a time-chartered ship were entitled to payment for its continued use by a charterer after lawful withdrawal of the vessel for non-payment of hire. The central question, leading to the different outcome between the courts, was the effect of the decision to withdraw being at the owners’ own election and for commercial purposes.

AB - In May 2012 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held – reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeal – that the owners of a time-chartered ship were entitled to payment for its continued use by a charterer after lawful withdrawal of the vessel for non-payment of hire. The central question, leading to the different outcome between the courts, was the effect of the decision to withdraw being at the owners’ own election and for commercial purposes.

UR - https://www.ibanet.org/Article/NewDetail.aspx?ArticleUid=3DEF3245-10C6-468A-AD98-246D77323CA3#3

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - Business Law International

JF - Business Law International

IS - 1

ER -