Category-specific enhancement of retrieval due to field perspective

Gurjog Bagri, Gregory V Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two memory perspectives have been distinguished: A field perspective where events are re-experienced in the first person, and an observer perspective where events are witnessed in the third person. Two experiments examined the influence of memory perspective on objective memory performance. In both
experiments participants were presented with a series of verbal passages, each of which contained several different categories of information. For four of these categories (pertaining to affective reactions, physical sensations, psychological states, and associated ideas), recall was significantly higher when a field
perspective was adopted than when an observer perspective was adopted, but for the five other categories (pertaining to physical actions, personal appearance, fine details, spatial relations, and peripheral details) there was no significant effect of perspective upon recall. The study is examined in the context of mental models and imagined episodic events.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-345
Number of pages9
JournalMemory
Volume17
Issue number3
Early online date5 Mar 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychology
Enhancement
Observer
Physical
Spatial Relations
Psychological
First Person
Person
Experiment
Mental Models
Affective

Cite this

Bagri, Gurjog ; V Jones, Gregory . / Category-specific enhancement of retrieval due to field perspective. In: Memory. 2009 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 337-345.
@article{d333c6d8afdc490e88ce85d7759394c1,
title = "Category-specific enhancement of retrieval due to field perspective",
abstract = "Two memory perspectives have been distinguished: A field perspective where events are re-experienced in the first person, and an observer perspective where events are witnessed in the third person. Two experiments examined the influence of memory perspective on objective memory performance. In bothexperiments participants were presented with a series of verbal passages, each of which contained several different categories of information. For four of these categories (pertaining to affective reactions, physical sensations, psychological states, and associated ideas), recall was significantly higher when a fieldperspective was adopted than when an observer perspective was adopted, but for the five other categories (pertaining to physical actions, personal appearance, fine details, spatial relations, and peripheral details) there was no significant effect of perspective upon recall. The study is examined in the context of mental models and imagined episodic events.",
keywords = "Category-specific enhancement, Memory perspective, Field, Observer",
author = "Gurjog Bagri and {V Jones}, Gregory",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/09658210902740860",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "337--345",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Category-specific enhancement of retrieval due to field perspective. / Bagri, Gurjog; V Jones, Gregory .

In: Memory, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2009, p. 337-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Category-specific enhancement of retrieval due to field perspective

AU - Bagri, Gurjog

AU - V Jones, Gregory

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Two memory perspectives have been distinguished: A field perspective where events are re-experienced in the first person, and an observer perspective where events are witnessed in the third person. Two experiments examined the influence of memory perspective on objective memory performance. In bothexperiments participants were presented with a series of verbal passages, each of which contained several different categories of information. For four of these categories (pertaining to affective reactions, physical sensations, psychological states, and associated ideas), recall was significantly higher when a fieldperspective was adopted than when an observer perspective was adopted, but for the five other categories (pertaining to physical actions, personal appearance, fine details, spatial relations, and peripheral details) there was no significant effect of perspective upon recall. The study is examined in the context of mental models and imagined episodic events.

AB - Two memory perspectives have been distinguished: A field perspective where events are re-experienced in the first person, and an observer perspective where events are witnessed in the third person. Two experiments examined the influence of memory perspective on objective memory performance. In bothexperiments participants were presented with a series of verbal passages, each of which contained several different categories of information. For four of these categories (pertaining to affective reactions, physical sensations, psychological states, and associated ideas), recall was significantly higher when a fieldperspective was adopted than when an observer perspective was adopted, but for the five other categories (pertaining to physical actions, personal appearance, fine details, spatial relations, and peripheral details) there was no significant effect of perspective upon recall. The study is examined in the context of mental models and imagined episodic events.

KW - Category-specific enhancement

KW - Memory perspective

KW - Field

KW - Observer

U2 - 10.1080/09658210902740860

DO - 10.1080/09658210902740860

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 337

EP - 345

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 3

ER -