Changing experiences of responsibilisation and contestation within counter-terrorism policies: the British Prevent experience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Preventative, 'soft' counter-terrorism policies have proved internationally controversial, as criticisms of Britain's Prevent strategy show. However, there is a danger that change, complexity and contestation within approaches like Prevent are overlooked. This article examines Prevent's changing focus of 'responsibilisation' and, in response, changing experiences of contestation by both the local state and by local Muslim communities, including mediation and 'enactment' by organisations and individual professionals. In discussing this, the article argues for a more nuanced analysis of Prevent, around both the 'state' and the situated use of agency and policy space. This supports the contention that Prevent is 'complexly flawed'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-321
Number of pages17
JournalPolicy and Politics
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Changing experiences of responsibilisation and contestation within counter-terrorism policies: the British Prevent experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this