Abstract
This paper argues that the increasing international salience of homelessness can be partially explained by reference to the revanchist thesis (involving processes of coerced exclusion and abjection), but the situation on the ground is more complex. It reports on interviews with 18 representatives of 11 homelessness service providers in one city in England. As Cloke et al. found, these providers tended to be either larger, more 'professional', 'insider' services or smaller, more 'amateur', 'outsider' services. However, this does not mean that the former were necessarily more revanchist and the latter less so. Rather, the actions of both types of organisation could, in some cases, be construed as both advancing and counteracting a revanchist project.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 419-427 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Health and Social Care in the Community |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 1 Dec 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Changing homelessness services: Revanchism, 'professionalisation' and resistance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Philip Brown
- Department of Social and Psychological Sciences - Professor of Housing and Communities
- School of Human and Health Sciences
- Just Futures Centre - Member
Person: Academic
Research output
- 14 Citations
- 1 Other report
-
Losing and Finding a Home: homelessness, multiple exclusion and everyday lives
Brown, P., Morris, G., Scullion, L. & Somerville, P., 1 Jan 2012, University of Salford. 48 p.Research output: Book/Report › Other report
Open Access
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver