Abstract
Critical analysis of anti-fraud provisions in relation to 'fundamental dishonesty' - comparison of fraudulent third party claims with fraudulent claims made under first party insurance contracts - scope of court discretion under concept of 'substantive injustice' and 'fair and just' - Irish approach to fraud and dishonesty.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 15-42 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Insurance Law Journal |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cheek by jowl: Fraudulent insurance claims and the counter measures enacted in personal injury cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver