Child welfare inequalities in the four nations of the UK

Paul Bywaters, Jonathan Scourfield, Chantel Jones, Tim Sparks, Martin Elliott, Jade Hooper, Claire Mccartan, Marina Shapira, Lisa Bunting, Brigid Daniel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Comparative international data on patterns of inequality in child welfare interventions, for example, the proportion of children about whom there are substantiated child protection concerns or who are in out-of-home care, are far less developed than data about inequalities in health. Few countries collect reliable, comprehensive information and definitions, methods of data collection and analysis are rarely consistent. The four UK countries (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) provide a potential ‘natural experiment’ for comparing intervention patterns. This study reports on a large quantitative, descriptive study focusing on children in contact with children’s services on a single date in 2015. It found that children’s chances of receiving a child protection intervention were related to family socio-economic circumstances, measured by neighbourhood deprivation, within all four countries. There was a strong social gradient which was significantly steeper in some countries than others. Ethnicity was another important factor underlying inequalities. While inequalities in patterns of intervention between the four countries were considerable, they did not mirror relative levels of deprivation in the child population. Inequalities in intervention rates result from a combination of demand and supply factors. The level and extent of inequity raise profound ethical, economic and practical challenges to those involved in child protection, the wider society and the state.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Social Work
Early online date11 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Child Welfare
child welfare
child protection
deprivation
home care
Economics
economics
data analysis
Northern Ireland
ethnicity
contact
Wales
supply
Scotland
Home Care Services
England
demand
experiment
health
Health

Cite this

Bywaters, P., Scourfield, J., Jones, C., Sparks, T., Elliott, M., Hooper, J., ... Daniel, B. (2018). Child welfare inequalities in the four nations of the UK. Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318793479
Bywaters, Paul ; Scourfield, Jonathan ; Jones, Chantel ; Sparks, Tim ; Elliott, Martin ; Hooper, Jade ; Mccartan, Claire ; Shapira, Marina ; Bunting, Lisa ; Daniel, Brigid. / Child welfare inequalities in the four nations of the UK. In: Journal of Social Work. 2018.
@article{6734ea94d69c4eef8ba3830db6bb2f44,
title = "Child welfare inequalities in the four nations of the UK",
abstract = "Comparative international data on patterns of inequality in child welfare interventions, for example, the proportion of children about whom there are substantiated child protection concerns or who are in out-of-home care, are far less developed than data about inequalities in health. Few countries collect reliable, comprehensive information and definitions, methods of data collection and analysis are rarely consistent. The four UK countries (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) provide a potential ‘natural experiment’ for comparing intervention patterns. This study reports on a large quantitative, descriptive study focusing on children in contact with children’s services on a single date in 2015. It found that children’s chances of receiving a child protection intervention were related to family socio-economic circumstances, measured by neighbourhood deprivation, within all four countries. There was a strong social gradient which was significantly steeper in some countries than others. Ethnicity was another important factor underlying inequalities. While inequalities in patterns of intervention between the four countries were considerable, they did not mirror relative levels of deprivation in the child population. Inequalities in intervention rates result from a combination of demand and supply factors. The level and extent of inequity raise profound ethical, economic and practical challenges to those involved in child protection, the wider society and the state.",
keywords = "Child abuse and neglect (CAN), child protection, inequalities, out-of-home care, children's services",
author = "Paul Bywaters and Jonathan Scourfield and Chantel Jones and Tim Sparks and Martin Elliott and Jade Hooper and Claire Mccartan and Marina Shapira and Lisa Bunting and Brigid Daniel",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1177/1468017318793479",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Social Work",
issn = "1468-0173",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Bywaters, P, Scourfield, J, Jones, C, Sparks, T, Elliott, M, Hooper, J, Mccartan, C, Shapira, M, Bunting, L & Daniel, B 2018, 'Child welfare inequalities in the four nations of the UK' Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318793479

Child welfare inequalities in the four nations of the UK. / Bywaters, Paul; Scourfield, Jonathan; Jones, Chantel; Sparks, Tim; Elliott, Martin; Hooper, Jade; Mccartan, Claire; Shapira, Marina; Bunting, Lisa; Daniel, Brigid.

In: Journal of Social Work, 11.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Child welfare inequalities in the four nations of the UK

AU - Bywaters,Paul

AU - Scourfield,Jonathan

AU - Jones,Chantel

AU - Sparks,Tim

AU - Elliott,Martin

AU - Hooper,Jade

AU - Mccartan,Claire

AU - Shapira,Marina

AU - Bunting,Lisa

AU - Daniel,Brigid

PY - 2018/9/11

Y1 - 2018/9/11

N2 - Comparative international data on patterns of inequality in child welfare interventions, for example, the proportion of children about whom there are substantiated child protection concerns or who are in out-of-home care, are far less developed than data about inequalities in health. Few countries collect reliable, comprehensive information and definitions, methods of data collection and analysis are rarely consistent. The four UK countries (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) provide a potential ‘natural experiment’ for comparing intervention patterns. This study reports on a large quantitative, descriptive study focusing on children in contact with children’s services on a single date in 2015. It found that children’s chances of receiving a child protection intervention were related to family socio-economic circumstances, measured by neighbourhood deprivation, within all four countries. There was a strong social gradient which was significantly steeper in some countries than others. Ethnicity was another important factor underlying inequalities. While inequalities in patterns of intervention between the four countries were considerable, they did not mirror relative levels of deprivation in the child population. Inequalities in intervention rates result from a combination of demand and supply factors. The level and extent of inequity raise profound ethical, economic and practical challenges to those involved in child protection, the wider society and the state.

AB - Comparative international data on patterns of inequality in child welfare interventions, for example, the proportion of children about whom there are substantiated child protection concerns or who are in out-of-home care, are far less developed than data about inequalities in health. Few countries collect reliable, comprehensive information and definitions, methods of data collection and analysis are rarely consistent. The four UK countries (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) provide a potential ‘natural experiment’ for comparing intervention patterns. This study reports on a large quantitative, descriptive study focusing on children in contact with children’s services on a single date in 2015. It found that children’s chances of receiving a child protection intervention were related to family socio-economic circumstances, measured by neighbourhood deprivation, within all four countries. There was a strong social gradient which was significantly steeper in some countries than others. Ethnicity was another important factor underlying inequalities. While inequalities in patterns of intervention between the four countries were considerable, they did not mirror relative levels of deprivation in the child population. Inequalities in intervention rates result from a combination of demand and supply factors. The level and extent of inequity raise profound ethical, economic and practical challenges to those involved in child protection, the wider society and the state.

KW - Child abuse and neglect (CAN)

KW - child protection

KW - inequalities

KW - out-of-home care

KW - children's services

U2 - 10.1177/1468017318793479

DO - 10.1177/1468017318793479

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Social Work

T2 - Journal of Social Work

JF - Journal of Social Work

SN - 1468-0173

ER -