Choice and control in social care: Experiences of older self-funders in England

Kate Baxter, Emily Heavey, Yvonne Birks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper considers the experiences of older self‐funders in England in the context of policies promoting choice and control. Self‐funders are people who are not state‐funded; they pay for social care from their own resources. Choice and control have been operationalized through personal budgets, based on the assumption that managing resources enhances ability to access appropriate care and support. This paper uses data from 40 qualitative interviews with self‐funders and their relatives, and 19 with professionals. It explores the impact of the financial and social capital that self‐funders are assumed to have and asks how older self‐funders experience choice and control. The study found that older self‐funders drew on personal experiences, family, and friends for information; were reluctant to spend their wealth on care due to competing priorities; and felt they had more control over the timing of decisions than people who were state‐funded. Personal wealth appears to be perceived differently to funds “gifted” to people through cash for care schemes.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Early online date5 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

social capital
resource
experience
qualitative interview
resources
finance
budget
ability
family
policy
decision

Cite this

@article{65504c089df34146b9759ce09ce606af,
title = "Choice and control in social care: Experiences of older self-funders in England",
abstract = "This paper considers the experiences of older self‐funders in England in the context of policies promoting choice and control. Self‐funders are people who are not state‐funded; they pay for social care from their own resources. Choice and control have been operationalized through personal budgets, based on the assumption that managing resources enhances ability to access appropriate care and support. This paper uses data from 40 qualitative interviews with self‐funders and their relatives, and 19 with professionals. It explores the impact of the financial and social capital that self‐funders are assumed to have and asks how older self‐funders experience choice and control. The study found that older self‐funders drew on personal experiences, family, and friends for information; were reluctant to spend their wealth on care due to competing priorities; and felt they had more control over the timing of decisions than people who were state‐funded. Personal wealth appears to be perceived differently to funds “gifted” to people through cash for care schemes.",
keywords = "Self-funders, Choice and control, Social care, Older people, choice and control, older people, social care, self-funders",
author = "Kate Baxter and Emily Heavey and Yvonne Birks",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1111/spol.12534",
language = "English",
journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Choice and control in social care : Experiences of older self-funders in England. / Baxter, Kate; Heavey, Emily; Birks, Yvonne.

In: Social Policy and Administration, 05.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choice and control in social care

T2 - Social Policy and Administration

AU - Baxter, Kate

AU - Heavey, Emily

AU - Birks, Yvonne

PY - 2019/8/5

Y1 - 2019/8/5

N2 - This paper considers the experiences of older self‐funders in England in the context of policies promoting choice and control. Self‐funders are people who are not state‐funded; they pay for social care from their own resources. Choice and control have been operationalized through personal budgets, based on the assumption that managing resources enhances ability to access appropriate care and support. This paper uses data from 40 qualitative interviews with self‐funders and their relatives, and 19 with professionals. It explores the impact of the financial and social capital that self‐funders are assumed to have and asks how older self‐funders experience choice and control. The study found that older self‐funders drew on personal experiences, family, and friends for information; were reluctant to spend their wealth on care due to competing priorities; and felt they had more control over the timing of decisions than people who were state‐funded. Personal wealth appears to be perceived differently to funds “gifted” to people through cash for care schemes.

AB - This paper considers the experiences of older self‐funders in England in the context of policies promoting choice and control. Self‐funders are people who are not state‐funded; they pay for social care from their own resources. Choice and control have been operationalized through personal budgets, based on the assumption that managing resources enhances ability to access appropriate care and support. This paper uses data from 40 qualitative interviews with self‐funders and their relatives, and 19 with professionals. It explores the impact of the financial and social capital that self‐funders are assumed to have and asks how older self‐funders experience choice and control. The study found that older self‐funders drew on personal experiences, family, and friends for information; were reluctant to spend their wealth on care due to competing priorities; and felt they had more control over the timing of decisions than people who were state‐funded. Personal wealth appears to be perceived differently to funds “gifted” to people through cash for care schemes.

KW - Self-funders

KW - Choice and control

KW - Social care

KW - Older people

KW - choice and control

KW - older people

KW - social care

KW - self-funders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070676795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/spol.12534

DO - 10.1111/spol.12534

M3 - Article

JO - Social Policy and Administration

JF - Social Policy and Administration

SN - 0144-5596

ER -