Civilizing the market for welfare friendly products in Europe?: The techno-ethics of the Welfare Quality Assessment

Mara Miele, John Lever

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Greater attention to and anxiety about farm animal welfare emerged at the end of the 20th century, as worries over food safety and food quality (connected to the BSE, FMD and other epidemics) pushed farm animal welfare into public discourse and political debate. The creation of a transparent market for animal friendly produced foods is one of the strategies currently envisaged by the EU to meet the widely recognized challenge of promoting animal welfare without threatening the economic competitiveness of the animal farming industry in Europe (EU Animal Welfare Strategy, 2012–2015). This paper aims to contribute to debates on STS and food standards within the geographies of food literature. Empirically it draws on research carried out during the EU funded project Welfare Quality®, which has proposed a protocol based on scientifically validated measures for assessing the welfare of chickens, pigs and cattle both on-farm and at slaughterhouse, in order to making ‘accountable’ the (ubiquitous) ‘welfare claims’ on animal products. While these developments have the potential to improve the life of farm animals by rewarding the most ‘animal friendly’ producers on the market, we address the matters of concern that arise from the implementation of the protocol by looking at a case study of UK based free-range chicken producers. Drawing on STS insights and especially on the work of Callon et al., 2002, Callon et al., 2009 we look at the controversies that emerge about the ‘welfare friendliness’ qualification of free-range chickens and we discuss the role and partial achievements of this market for civilizing animal welfare politics and science.
LanguageEnglish
Pages63-72
Number of pages10
JournalGeoforum
Volume48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

animal
welfare
moral philosophy
market
food
farm
EU
producer
qualification
competitiveness
geography
anxiety
politics
industry
discourse
science
economics

Cite this

@article{c95317c4973b4c63aee07476f78491cb,
title = "Civilizing the market for welfare friendly products in Europe?: The techno-ethics of the Welfare Quality Assessment",
abstract = "Greater attention to and anxiety about farm animal welfare emerged at the end of the 20th century, as worries over food safety and food quality (connected to the BSE, FMD and other epidemics) pushed farm animal welfare into public discourse and political debate. The creation of a transparent market for animal friendly produced foods is one of the strategies currently envisaged by the EU to meet the widely recognized challenge of promoting animal welfare without threatening the economic competitiveness of the animal farming industry in Europe (EU Animal Welfare Strategy, 2012–2015). This paper aims to contribute to debates on STS and food standards within the geographies of food literature. Empirically it draws on research carried out during the EU funded project Welfare Quality{\circledR}, which has proposed a protocol based on scientifically validated measures for assessing the welfare of chickens, pigs and cattle both on-farm and at slaughterhouse, in order to making ‘accountable’ the (ubiquitous) ‘welfare claims’ on animal products. While these developments have the potential to improve the life of farm animals by rewarding the most ‘animal friendly’ producers on the market, we address the matters of concern that arise from the implementation of the protocol by looking at a case study of UK based free-range chicken producers. Drawing on STS insights and especially on the work of Callon et al., 2002, Callon et al., 2009 we look at the controversies that emerge about the ‘welfare friendliness’ qualification of free-range chickens and we discuss the role and partial achievements of this market for civilizing animal welfare politics and science.",
keywords = "Civilizing markets, STS, Geographies of food consumption, Animal welfare standards",
author = "Mara Miele and John Lever",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.003",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "63--72",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Civilizing the market for welfare friendly products in Europe? The techno-ethics of the Welfare Quality Assessment. / Miele, Mara; Lever, John.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 48, 01.08.2013, p. 63-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Civilizing the market for welfare friendly products in Europe?

T2 - Geoforum

AU - Miele, Mara

AU - Lever, John

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Greater attention to and anxiety about farm animal welfare emerged at the end of the 20th century, as worries over food safety and food quality (connected to the BSE, FMD and other epidemics) pushed farm animal welfare into public discourse and political debate. The creation of a transparent market for animal friendly produced foods is one of the strategies currently envisaged by the EU to meet the widely recognized challenge of promoting animal welfare without threatening the economic competitiveness of the animal farming industry in Europe (EU Animal Welfare Strategy, 2012–2015). This paper aims to contribute to debates on STS and food standards within the geographies of food literature. Empirically it draws on research carried out during the EU funded project Welfare Quality®, which has proposed a protocol based on scientifically validated measures for assessing the welfare of chickens, pigs and cattle both on-farm and at slaughterhouse, in order to making ‘accountable’ the (ubiquitous) ‘welfare claims’ on animal products. While these developments have the potential to improve the life of farm animals by rewarding the most ‘animal friendly’ producers on the market, we address the matters of concern that arise from the implementation of the protocol by looking at a case study of UK based free-range chicken producers. Drawing on STS insights and especially on the work of Callon et al., 2002, Callon et al., 2009 we look at the controversies that emerge about the ‘welfare friendliness’ qualification of free-range chickens and we discuss the role and partial achievements of this market for civilizing animal welfare politics and science.

AB - Greater attention to and anxiety about farm animal welfare emerged at the end of the 20th century, as worries over food safety and food quality (connected to the BSE, FMD and other epidemics) pushed farm animal welfare into public discourse and political debate. The creation of a transparent market for animal friendly produced foods is one of the strategies currently envisaged by the EU to meet the widely recognized challenge of promoting animal welfare without threatening the economic competitiveness of the animal farming industry in Europe (EU Animal Welfare Strategy, 2012–2015). This paper aims to contribute to debates on STS and food standards within the geographies of food literature. Empirically it draws on research carried out during the EU funded project Welfare Quality®, which has proposed a protocol based on scientifically validated measures for assessing the welfare of chickens, pigs and cattle both on-farm and at slaughterhouse, in order to making ‘accountable’ the (ubiquitous) ‘welfare claims’ on animal products. While these developments have the potential to improve the life of farm animals by rewarding the most ‘animal friendly’ producers on the market, we address the matters of concern that arise from the implementation of the protocol by looking at a case study of UK based free-range chicken producers. Drawing on STS insights and especially on the work of Callon et al., 2002, Callon et al., 2009 we look at the controversies that emerge about the ‘welfare friendliness’ qualification of free-range chickens and we discuss the role and partial achievements of this market for civilizing animal welfare politics and science.

KW - Civilizing markets

KW - STS

KW - Geographies of food consumption

KW - Animal welfare standards

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.003

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 63

EP - 72

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -