Clinical networks for nursing research

Warren P. Gillibrand, C. Burton, G. G. Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As a central feature of national research and development strategies, clinical effectiveness emphasizes the importance of rigorous experimental research in nursing. It is naïve to assume that over-worked practitioners, with little research training and supervision, can undertake this type of research. Traditional approaches to research support rely on the practitioner registering for a higher degree and academic supervision. This assumes that the responsibility for research lies with practice, with higher education adopting a reactive stance in supporting research and development in nursing. The literature demonstrates a growing number of innovative models for facilitating nursing research. These, however, tend to focus on single appointments with limited and predefined access to clinical areas and patient populations. This article details a new initiative from the Clinical Nursing Practice Research Unit (CNPRU) that aims to support programmatic research in nursing practice through Clinical Networks for Nursing Research. Our research strategy is to contribute to the development of nursing science by facilitating effective collaboration between clinicians and higher education in core clinical specialties, including stroke rehabilitation, diabetes, mental health and community nursing. Each researcher has developed networks with a number of clinical areas, locally, regionally or nationally, through seminars, conferences or newsletters, to link practitioners and generate answerable research questions. Network communications also rely heavily on the establishment of interactive websites. This strategy has resulted in a number of collaborative, evaluative studies including clinical trials in rehabilitation, diabetic nursing and primary care.

LanguageEnglish
Pages188-193
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Nursing Review
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Clinical Nursing Research
Nursing Research
Research
Nursing
Rehabilitation Nursing
Psychiatric Nursing
Education
Nursing Care
Primary Health Care
Appointments and Schedules
Communication
Research Personnel
Clinical Trials

Cite this

Gillibrand, Warren P. ; Burton, C. ; Watkins, G. G. / Clinical networks for nursing research. In: International Nursing Review. 2002 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. pp. 188-193.
@article{26d35dccbe7e4aad96ea463ee1a0feb6,
title = "Clinical networks for nursing research",
abstract = "As a central feature of national research and development strategies, clinical effectiveness emphasizes the importance of rigorous experimental research in nursing. It is na{\"i}ve to assume that over-worked practitioners, with little research training and supervision, can undertake this type of research. Traditional approaches to research support rely on the practitioner registering for a higher degree and academic supervision. This assumes that the responsibility for research lies with practice, with higher education adopting a reactive stance in supporting research and development in nursing. The literature demonstrates a growing number of innovative models for facilitating nursing research. These, however, tend to focus on single appointments with limited and predefined access to clinical areas and patient populations. This article details a new initiative from the Clinical Nursing Practice Research Unit (CNPRU) that aims to support programmatic research in nursing practice through Clinical Networks for Nursing Research. Our research strategy is to contribute to the development of nursing science by facilitating effective collaboration between clinicians and higher education in core clinical specialties, including stroke rehabilitation, diabetes, mental health and community nursing. Each researcher has developed networks with a number of clinical areas, locally, regionally or nationally, through seminars, conferences or newsletters, to link practitioners and generate answerable research questions. Network communications also rely heavily on the establishment of interactive websites. This strategy has resulted in a number of collaborative, evaluative studies including clinical trials in rehabilitation, diabetic nursing and primary care.",
keywords = "Clinical, Networks, Nursing, Practice, Research",
author = "Gillibrand, {Warren P.} and C. Burton and Watkins, {G. G.}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1046/j.1466-7657.2002.00124.x",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "188--193",
journal = "International Nursing Review",
issn = "0020-8132",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Clinical networks for nursing research. / Gillibrand, Warren P.; Burton, C.; Watkins, G. G.

In: International Nursing Review, Vol. 49, No. 3, 06.09.2002, p. 188-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical networks for nursing research

AU - Gillibrand, Warren P.

AU - Burton, C.

AU - Watkins, G. G.

PY - 2002/9/6

Y1 - 2002/9/6

N2 - As a central feature of national research and development strategies, clinical effectiveness emphasizes the importance of rigorous experimental research in nursing. It is naïve to assume that over-worked practitioners, with little research training and supervision, can undertake this type of research. Traditional approaches to research support rely on the practitioner registering for a higher degree and academic supervision. This assumes that the responsibility for research lies with practice, with higher education adopting a reactive stance in supporting research and development in nursing. The literature demonstrates a growing number of innovative models for facilitating nursing research. These, however, tend to focus on single appointments with limited and predefined access to clinical areas and patient populations. This article details a new initiative from the Clinical Nursing Practice Research Unit (CNPRU) that aims to support programmatic research in nursing practice through Clinical Networks for Nursing Research. Our research strategy is to contribute to the development of nursing science by facilitating effective collaboration between clinicians and higher education in core clinical specialties, including stroke rehabilitation, diabetes, mental health and community nursing. Each researcher has developed networks with a number of clinical areas, locally, regionally or nationally, through seminars, conferences or newsletters, to link practitioners and generate answerable research questions. Network communications also rely heavily on the establishment of interactive websites. This strategy has resulted in a number of collaborative, evaluative studies including clinical trials in rehabilitation, diabetic nursing and primary care.

AB - As a central feature of national research and development strategies, clinical effectiveness emphasizes the importance of rigorous experimental research in nursing. It is naïve to assume that over-worked practitioners, with little research training and supervision, can undertake this type of research. Traditional approaches to research support rely on the practitioner registering for a higher degree and academic supervision. This assumes that the responsibility for research lies with practice, with higher education adopting a reactive stance in supporting research and development in nursing. The literature demonstrates a growing number of innovative models for facilitating nursing research. These, however, tend to focus on single appointments with limited and predefined access to clinical areas and patient populations. This article details a new initiative from the Clinical Nursing Practice Research Unit (CNPRU) that aims to support programmatic research in nursing practice through Clinical Networks for Nursing Research. Our research strategy is to contribute to the development of nursing science by facilitating effective collaboration between clinicians and higher education in core clinical specialties, including stroke rehabilitation, diabetes, mental health and community nursing. Each researcher has developed networks with a number of clinical areas, locally, regionally or nationally, through seminars, conferences or newsletters, to link practitioners and generate answerable research questions. Network communications also rely heavily on the establishment of interactive websites. This strategy has resulted in a number of collaborative, evaluative studies including clinical trials in rehabilitation, diabetic nursing and primary care.

KW - Clinical

KW - Networks

KW - Nursing

KW - Practice

KW - Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036729428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1466-7657.2002.00124.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1466-7657.2002.00124.x

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 188

EP - 193

JO - International Nursing Review

T2 - International Nursing Review

JF - International Nursing Review

SN - 0020-8132

IS - 3

ER -