Cognitive bias in line-up identifications

The impact of administrator knowledge

David Canter, Laura Hammond, Donna Youngs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior knowledge of the likely or expected outcome of a forensic investigation has been shown to produce biases in the results obtained, reducing objectivity. The wide prevalence of such cognitive biases in many judgments has long been recognised by social psychologists, but its importance is only now gaining appreciation within forensic science communities. It is therefore timely to draw attention to the power of cognitive biases found in a study of the influence of administrator expectations on photographic identifications. Data are presented to show that when a line-up administrator knows the identity and position of a target within a line-up choice, in which the 'witness' is ignorant of the actual target, that target is more than twice as likely to be selected compared with when the administrator is kept 'blind'. These findings, taken together with related studies, support the recommendation that all forensic analyses are made 'double-blind'-a method that has proven to be effective in reducing such effects within the social sciences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-88
Number of pages6
JournalScience and Justice
Volume53
Issue number2
Early online date30 Dec 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Administrative Personnel
Forensic Sciences
Social Sciences
Double-Blind Method
Psychology

Cite this

@article{948f3b2351c845f19fa077c613708ead,
title = "Cognitive bias in line-up identifications: The impact of administrator knowledge",
abstract = "Prior knowledge of the likely or expected outcome of a forensic investigation has been shown to produce biases in the results obtained, reducing objectivity. The wide prevalence of such cognitive biases in many judgments has long been recognised by social psychologists, but its importance is only now gaining appreciation within forensic science communities. It is therefore timely to draw attention to the power of cognitive biases found in a study of the influence of administrator expectations on photographic identifications. Data are presented to show that when a line-up administrator knows the identity and position of a target within a line-up choice, in which the 'witness' is ignorant of the actual target, that target is more than twice as likely to be selected compared with when the administrator is kept 'blind'. These findings, taken together with related studies, support the recommendation that all forensic analyses are made 'double-blind'-a method that has proven to be effective in reducing such effects within the social sciences.",
keywords = "Cognitive bias, Experimental design, Experimenter effects, Forensic decision making, Interpretation",
author = "David Canter and Laura Hammond and Donna Youngs",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.scijus.2012.12.001",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "83--88",
journal = "Science and Justice - Journal of the Forensic Science Society",
issn = "1355-0306",
publisher = "Forensic Science Society",
number = "2",

}

Cognitive bias in line-up identifications : The impact of administrator knowledge. / Canter, David; Hammond, Laura; Youngs, Donna.

In: Science and Justice, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.06.2013, p. 83-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive bias in line-up identifications

T2 - The impact of administrator knowledge

AU - Canter, David

AU - Hammond, Laura

AU - Youngs, Donna

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - Prior knowledge of the likely or expected outcome of a forensic investigation has been shown to produce biases in the results obtained, reducing objectivity. The wide prevalence of such cognitive biases in many judgments has long been recognised by social psychologists, but its importance is only now gaining appreciation within forensic science communities. It is therefore timely to draw attention to the power of cognitive biases found in a study of the influence of administrator expectations on photographic identifications. Data are presented to show that when a line-up administrator knows the identity and position of a target within a line-up choice, in which the 'witness' is ignorant of the actual target, that target is more than twice as likely to be selected compared with when the administrator is kept 'blind'. These findings, taken together with related studies, support the recommendation that all forensic analyses are made 'double-blind'-a method that has proven to be effective in reducing such effects within the social sciences.

AB - Prior knowledge of the likely or expected outcome of a forensic investigation has been shown to produce biases in the results obtained, reducing objectivity. The wide prevalence of such cognitive biases in many judgments has long been recognised by social psychologists, but its importance is only now gaining appreciation within forensic science communities. It is therefore timely to draw attention to the power of cognitive biases found in a study of the influence of administrator expectations on photographic identifications. Data are presented to show that when a line-up administrator knows the identity and position of a target within a line-up choice, in which the 'witness' is ignorant of the actual target, that target is more than twice as likely to be selected compared with when the administrator is kept 'blind'. These findings, taken together with related studies, support the recommendation that all forensic analyses are made 'double-blind'-a method that has proven to be effective in reducing such effects within the social sciences.

KW - Cognitive bias

KW - Experimental design

KW - Experimenter effects

KW - Forensic decision making

KW - Interpretation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876702812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scijus.2012.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.scijus.2012.12.001

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 83

EP - 88

JO - Science and Justice - Journal of the Forensic Science Society

JF - Science and Justice - Journal of the Forensic Science Society

SN - 1355-0306

IS - 2

ER -