Collaborative Inquiry by Teacher Educators

Mess and Messiness

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Collaborative inquiry is a widespread and dominant approach to professional
learning within education and is backed by a growing research base. However,
one dimension of it seems to have been largely neglected by research methods
texts and research accounts: the messiness of teacher collaboration. This seems
a significant gap in the collaborative inquiry “story”. Drawing on Adamson and
Walker’s notion of messiness as the choices, problems and unexpected challenges
of a collaborative inquiry, this chapter foregrounds mess and messiness to answer
four research questions: what is messiness in collaborative inquiry? How does
messiness happen? Should we document mess and messiness? How can you
document messiness? These questions are answered by drawing on existing
literature and using illustrative examples from the author’s doctoral research.
The chapter argues that when honestly documented, using “Second Text” and
“confessional tales”, for instance, messiness can contribute to enhanced rigour
within collaborative inquiry. It concludes by asserting that researchers need to
acquire “Bildung” if they are to “surf the wave(s) of messiness” in their research.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTeachers and Teacher Educators Learning Through Inquiry
Subtitle of host publicationInternational Perspectives
EditorsPete Boyd, Agnieszka Szplit
Place of PublicationKraków
Publisher Wydawnictwo Attyka
Chapter12
Pages239-262
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)ISBN 978-83-65644-28-2
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

educator
teacher
education

Cite this

Powell, D. (2017). Collaborative Inquiry by Teacher Educators: Mess and Messiness. In P. Boyd, & A. Szplit (Eds.), Teachers and Teacher Educators Learning Through Inquiry: International Perspectives (pp. 239-262). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Attyka.
Powell, David. / Collaborative Inquiry by Teacher Educators : Mess and Messiness. Teachers and Teacher Educators Learning Through Inquiry: International Perspectives. editor / Pete Boyd ; Agnieszka Szplit. Kraków : Wydawnictwo Attyka, 2017. pp. 239-262
@inbook{fb802732a994499989f95d1af29d2d75,
title = "Collaborative Inquiry by Teacher Educators: Mess and Messiness",
abstract = "Collaborative inquiry is a widespread and dominant approach to professionallearning within education and is backed by a growing research base. However,one dimension of it seems to have been largely neglected by research methodstexts and research accounts: the messiness of teacher collaboration. This seemsa significant gap in the collaborative inquiry “story”. Drawing on Adamson andWalker’s notion of messiness as the choices, problems and unexpected challengesof a collaborative inquiry, this chapter foregrounds mess and messiness to answerfour research questions: what is messiness in collaborative inquiry? How doesmessiness happen? Should we document mess and messiness? How can youdocument messiness? These questions are answered by drawing on existingliterature and using illustrative examples from the author’s doctoral research.The chapter argues that when honestly documented, using “Second Text” and“confessional tales”, for instance, messiness can contribute to enhanced rigourwithin collaborative inquiry. It concludes by asserting that researchers need toacquire “Bildung” if they are to “surf the wave(s) of messiness” in their research.",
author = "David Powell",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "10",
language = "English",
pages = "239--262",
editor = "Pete Boyd and Agnieszka Szplit",
booktitle = "Teachers and Teacher Educators Learning Through Inquiry",
publisher = "Wydawnictwo Attyka",

}

Powell, D 2017, Collaborative Inquiry by Teacher Educators: Mess and Messiness. in P Boyd & A Szplit (eds), Teachers and Teacher Educators Learning Through Inquiry: International Perspectives. Wydawnictwo Attyka, Kraków, pp. 239-262.

Collaborative Inquiry by Teacher Educators : Mess and Messiness. / Powell, David.

Teachers and Teacher Educators Learning Through Inquiry: International Perspectives. ed. / Pete Boyd; Agnieszka Szplit. Kraków : Wydawnictwo Attyka, 2017. p. 239-262.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Collaborative Inquiry by Teacher Educators

T2 - Mess and Messiness

AU - Powell, David

PY - 2017/7/10

Y1 - 2017/7/10

N2 - Collaborative inquiry is a widespread and dominant approach to professionallearning within education and is backed by a growing research base. However,one dimension of it seems to have been largely neglected by research methodstexts and research accounts: the messiness of teacher collaboration. This seemsa significant gap in the collaborative inquiry “story”. Drawing on Adamson andWalker’s notion of messiness as the choices, problems and unexpected challengesof a collaborative inquiry, this chapter foregrounds mess and messiness to answerfour research questions: what is messiness in collaborative inquiry? How doesmessiness happen? Should we document mess and messiness? How can youdocument messiness? These questions are answered by drawing on existingliterature and using illustrative examples from the author’s doctoral research.The chapter argues that when honestly documented, using “Second Text” and“confessional tales”, for instance, messiness can contribute to enhanced rigourwithin collaborative inquiry. It concludes by asserting that researchers need toacquire “Bildung” if they are to “surf the wave(s) of messiness” in their research.

AB - Collaborative inquiry is a widespread and dominant approach to professionallearning within education and is backed by a growing research base. However,one dimension of it seems to have been largely neglected by research methodstexts and research accounts: the messiness of teacher collaboration. This seemsa significant gap in the collaborative inquiry “story”. Drawing on Adamson andWalker’s notion of messiness as the choices, problems and unexpected challengesof a collaborative inquiry, this chapter foregrounds mess and messiness to answerfour research questions: what is messiness in collaborative inquiry? How doesmessiness happen? Should we document mess and messiness? How can youdocument messiness? These questions are answered by drawing on existingliterature and using illustrative examples from the author’s doctoral research.The chapter argues that when honestly documented, using “Second Text” and“confessional tales”, for instance, messiness can contribute to enhanced rigourwithin collaborative inquiry. It concludes by asserting that researchers need toacquire “Bildung” if they are to “surf the wave(s) of messiness” in their research.

UR - http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/3088/1/teachers%20and%20teacher%20educators%20learning%20through%20inquiry%20Boyd%20%26%20Szplit%202017.pdf

M3 - Chapter

SP - 239

EP - 262

BT - Teachers and Teacher Educators Learning Through Inquiry

A2 - Boyd, Pete

A2 - Szplit, Agnieszka

PB - Wydawnictwo Attyka

CY - Kraków

ER -

Powell D. Collaborative Inquiry by Teacher Educators: Mess and Messiness. In Boyd P, Szplit A, editors, Teachers and Teacher Educators Learning Through Inquiry: International Perspectives. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Attyka. 2017. p. 239-262