Comfort radicalism and NEETS: A conservative praxis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) are construed by policy-makers as a pressing problem about which something should be done. Such young people’s lack of employment is thought to pose difficulties for wider society in relation to social cohesion and inclusion, and it is feared that they will become a ‘lost generation’. This paper draws upon English research, seeking to historicise the debate whilst acknowledging that these issues have a much wider purchase. The notion of NEETs rests alongside longstanding concerns of the English state and middle classes, addressing unruly male workingclass youth as well as the moral turpitude of working class girls. Waged labour and domesticity are seen as a means to integrate such groups into society thereby generating social cohesion. The paper places the debate within it socio-economic context and draws on theorisations of cognitive capitalism, Italian workerism, as well as emerging theories of antiwork to analyse these. It concludes by arguing that ‘radical’ approaches to NEETs that point towards inequities embedded in the social structure and call for social democratic solutions veer towards a form of comfort radicalism. Such approaches leave in place the dominance of capitalist relations as well as productivist orientations that celebrate waged labour.

LanguageEnglish
Pages272-289
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Studies in Sociology of Education
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jul 2014

Fingerprint

radicalism
social cohesion
labor
working class
social structure
middle class
purchase
capitalist society
inclusion
lack
economics
education
Group
Society

Cite this

@article{e883e5b61d0b4d2e9b197c51639ef9c8,
title = "Comfort radicalism and NEETS: A conservative praxis",
abstract = "Young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) are construed by policy-makers as a pressing problem about which something should be done. Such young people’s lack of employment is thought to pose difficulties for wider society in relation to social cohesion and inclusion, and it is feared that they will become a ‘lost generation’. This paper draws upon English research, seeking to historicise the debate whilst acknowledging that these issues have a much wider purchase. The notion of NEETs rests alongside longstanding concerns of the English state and middle classes, addressing unruly male workingclass youth as well as the moral turpitude of working class girls. Waged labour and domesticity are seen as a means to integrate such groups into society thereby generating social cohesion. The paper places the debate within it socio-economic context and draws on theorisations of cognitive capitalism, Italian workerism, as well as emerging theories of antiwork to analyse these. It concludes by arguing that ‘radical’ approaches to NEETs that point towards inequities embedded in the social structure and call for social democratic solutions veer towards a form of comfort radicalism. Such approaches leave in place the dominance of capitalist relations as well as productivist orientations that celebrate waged labour.",
keywords = "Capitalism, Class relations, Education policy, NEETs",
author = "James Avis",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1080/09620214.2014.943030",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "272--289",
journal = "International Studies in Sociology of Education",
issn = "0962-0214",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Comfort radicalism and NEETS : A conservative praxis. / Avis, James.

In: International Studies in Sociology of Education, Vol. 24, No. 3, 29.07.2014, p. 272-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comfort radicalism and NEETS

T2 - International Studies in Sociology of Education

AU - Avis, James

PY - 2014/7/29

Y1 - 2014/7/29

N2 - Young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) are construed by policy-makers as a pressing problem about which something should be done. Such young people’s lack of employment is thought to pose difficulties for wider society in relation to social cohesion and inclusion, and it is feared that they will become a ‘lost generation’. This paper draws upon English research, seeking to historicise the debate whilst acknowledging that these issues have a much wider purchase. The notion of NEETs rests alongside longstanding concerns of the English state and middle classes, addressing unruly male workingclass youth as well as the moral turpitude of working class girls. Waged labour and domesticity are seen as a means to integrate such groups into society thereby generating social cohesion. The paper places the debate within it socio-economic context and draws on theorisations of cognitive capitalism, Italian workerism, as well as emerging theories of antiwork to analyse these. It concludes by arguing that ‘radical’ approaches to NEETs that point towards inequities embedded in the social structure and call for social democratic solutions veer towards a form of comfort radicalism. Such approaches leave in place the dominance of capitalist relations as well as productivist orientations that celebrate waged labour.

AB - Young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) are construed by policy-makers as a pressing problem about which something should be done. Such young people’s lack of employment is thought to pose difficulties for wider society in relation to social cohesion and inclusion, and it is feared that they will become a ‘lost generation’. This paper draws upon English research, seeking to historicise the debate whilst acknowledging that these issues have a much wider purchase. The notion of NEETs rests alongside longstanding concerns of the English state and middle classes, addressing unruly male workingclass youth as well as the moral turpitude of working class girls. Waged labour and domesticity are seen as a means to integrate such groups into society thereby generating social cohesion. The paper places the debate within it socio-economic context and draws on theorisations of cognitive capitalism, Italian workerism, as well as emerging theories of antiwork to analyse these. It concludes by arguing that ‘radical’ approaches to NEETs that point towards inequities embedded in the social structure and call for social democratic solutions veer towards a form of comfort radicalism. Such approaches leave in place the dominance of capitalist relations as well as productivist orientations that celebrate waged labour.

KW - Capitalism

KW - Class relations

KW - Education policy

KW - NEETs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905294884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09620214.2014.943030

DO - 10.1080/09620214.2014.943030

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 272

EP - 289

JO - International Studies in Sociology of Education

JF - International Studies in Sociology of Education

SN - 0962-0214

IS - 3

ER -