Community forest management (CFM) in south-west Ethiopia: Maintaining forests, biodiversity and carbon stocks to support wild coffee conservation

Adrian Wood, Motuma Tolera, Matthew Snell, Peter Ohara, Afework Hailu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Community forest management (CFM) is increasingly recognised as a potentially effective way of maintaining forests, especially in the Global South. Despite the growing adoption of this approach, the results have been mixed and there is a need to explore both the ways in which a wider range of benefits can be obtained and how CFM can be implemented more effectively. New forest legislation on community forest management in the Southern Region of Ethiopia in 2012, alongside the development of a highly devolved method of CFM, provided a natural experiment for testing the effectiveness of this method as a way of maintaining forest and also supporting biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. The specific circumstances and details of the methods applied also provided an opportunity to compare this approach against other experiences of CFM to assess factors seen to be influencing success. This study was undertaken in an area of montane forest in south-west Ethiopia, which includes some of the remaining stands of wild Coffea arabica, and so it also sought to create supportive conditions for the in situ conservation of the wild coffee. Analyses of this approach to CFM over the six years show that the loss of forest was reduced to 0.18% per annum in the CFM managed areas compared to 2.6% per annum in the non-CFM forest, while biodiversity, in terms of species diversity, richness and evenness of distribution, was maintained in the natural forest managed under CFM. Carbon storage also increased in the natural forest managed under CFM. While the long-term results will only be seen after several decades, the findings show that the use of a highly devolved form of CFM, responding to felt needs and building up a community of practice were some of the positive influences which helped in achieving multiple impacts towards sustainable forest management and wild coffee conservation.

LanguageEnglish
Article number101980
Pages1-11
Number of pages11
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume59
Early online date24 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

coffee
Ethiopia
biodiversity
forest management
conservation
carbon
management
community
carbon sequestration
montane forest
species diversity
legislation

Cite this

@article{b18938b15dca437f8d0ee50ac92a2a3f,
title = "Community forest management (CFM) in south-west Ethiopia: Maintaining forests, biodiversity and carbon stocks to support wild coffee conservation",
abstract = "Community forest management (CFM) is increasingly recognised as a potentially effective way of maintaining forests, especially in the Global South. Despite the growing adoption of this approach, the results have been mixed and there is a need to explore both the ways in which a wider range of benefits can be obtained and how CFM can be implemented more effectively. New forest legislation on community forest management in the Southern Region of Ethiopia in 2012, alongside the development of a highly devolved method of CFM, provided a natural experiment for testing the effectiveness of this method as a way of maintaining forest and also supporting biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. The specific circumstances and details of the methods applied also provided an opportunity to compare this approach against other experiences of CFM to assess factors seen to be influencing success. This study was undertaken in an area of montane forest in south-west Ethiopia, which includes some of the remaining stands of wild Coffea arabica, and so it also sought to create supportive conditions for the in situ conservation of the wild coffee. Analyses of this approach to CFM over the six years show that the loss of forest was reduced to 0.18{\%} per annum in the CFM managed areas compared to 2.6{\%} per annum in the non-CFM forest, while biodiversity, in terms of species diversity, richness and evenness of distribution, was maintained in the natural forest managed under CFM. Carbon storage also increased in the natural forest managed under CFM. While the long-term results will only be seen after several decades, the findings show that the use of a highly devolved form of CFM, responding to felt needs and building up a community of practice were some of the positive influences which helped in achieving multiple impacts towards sustainable forest management and wild coffee conservation.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, Carbon storage, Community forest management, Ethiopia, Forest cover, Wild coffee",
author = "Adrian Wood and Motuma Tolera and Matthew Snell and Peter Ohara and Afework Hailu",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101980",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Global Environmental Change",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Community forest management (CFM) in south-west Ethiopia : Maintaining forests, biodiversity and carbon stocks to support wild coffee conservation. / Wood, Adrian; Tolera, Motuma; Snell, Matthew; Ohara, Peter; Hailu, Afework.

In: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 59, 101980, 24.09.2019, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community forest management (CFM) in south-west Ethiopia

T2 - Global Environmental Change

AU - Wood, Adrian

AU - Tolera, Motuma

AU - Snell, Matthew

AU - Ohara, Peter

AU - Hailu, Afework

PY - 2019/9/24

Y1 - 2019/9/24

N2 - Community forest management (CFM) is increasingly recognised as a potentially effective way of maintaining forests, especially in the Global South. Despite the growing adoption of this approach, the results have been mixed and there is a need to explore both the ways in which a wider range of benefits can be obtained and how CFM can be implemented more effectively. New forest legislation on community forest management in the Southern Region of Ethiopia in 2012, alongside the development of a highly devolved method of CFM, provided a natural experiment for testing the effectiveness of this method as a way of maintaining forest and also supporting biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. The specific circumstances and details of the methods applied also provided an opportunity to compare this approach against other experiences of CFM to assess factors seen to be influencing success. This study was undertaken in an area of montane forest in south-west Ethiopia, which includes some of the remaining stands of wild Coffea arabica, and so it also sought to create supportive conditions for the in situ conservation of the wild coffee. Analyses of this approach to CFM over the six years show that the loss of forest was reduced to 0.18% per annum in the CFM managed areas compared to 2.6% per annum in the non-CFM forest, while biodiversity, in terms of species diversity, richness and evenness of distribution, was maintained in the natural forest managed under CFM. Carbon storage also increased in the natural forest managed under CFM. While the long-term results will only be seen after several decades, the findings show that the use of a highly devolved form of CFM, responding to felt needs and building up a community of practice were some of the positive influences which helped in achieving multiple impacts towards sustainable forest management and wild coffee conservation.

AB - Community forest management (CFM) is increasingly recognised as a potentially effective way of maintaining forests, especially in the Global South. Despite the growing adoption of this approach, the results have been mixed and there is a need to explore both the ways in which a wider range of benefits can be obtained and how CFM can be implemented more effectively. New forest legislation on community forest management in the Southern Region of Ethiopia in 2012, alongside the development of a highly devolved method of CFM, provided a natural experiment for testing the effectiveness of this method as a way of maintaining forest and also supporting biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. The specific circumstances and details of the methods applied also provided an opportunity to compare this approach against other experiences of CFM to assess factors seen to be influencing success. This study was undertaken in an area of montane forest in south-west Ethiopia, which includes some of the remaining stands of wild Coffea arabica, and so it also sought to create supportive conditions for the in situ conservation of the wild coffee. Analyses of this approach to CFM over the six years show that the loss of forest was reduced to 0.18% per annum in the CFM managed areas compared to 2.6% per annum in the non-CFM forest, while biodiversity, in terms of species diversity, richness and evenness of distribution, was maintained in the natural forest managed under CFM. Carbon storage also increased in the natural forest managed under CFM. While the long-term results will only be seen after several decades, the findings show that the use of a highly devolved form of CFM, responding to felt needs and building up a community of practice were some of the positive influences which helped in achieving multiple impacts towards sustainable forest management and wild coffee conservation.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Carbon storage

KW - Community forest management

KW - Ethiopia

KW - Forest cover

KW - Wild coffee

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072570269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101980

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101980

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

SN - 0959-3780

M1 - 101980

ER -