TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Analysis of YOLOv8 and YOLOv10 in Vehicle Detection
T2 - Performance Metrics and Model Efficacy
AU - Sundaresan Geetha, Athulya
AU - Alif, Mujadded Al Rabbani
AU - Hussain, Muhammad
AU - Allen, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/9/1
Y1 - 2024/9/1
N2 - Accurate vehicle detection is crucial for the advancement of intelligent transportation systems, including autonomous driving and traffic monitoring. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two advanced deep learning models—YOLOv8 and YOLOv10—focusing on their efficacy in vehicle detection across multiple classes such as bicycles, buses, cars, motorcycles, and trucks. Using a range of performance metrics, including precision, recall, F1 score, and detailed confusion matrices, we evaluate the performance characteristics of each model.The findings reveal that YOLOv10 generally outperformed YOLOv8, particularly in detecting smaller and more complex vehicles like bicycles and trucks, which can be attributed to its architectural enhancements. Conversely, YOLOv8 showed a slight advantage in car detection, underscoring subtle differences in feature processing between the models. The performance for detecting buses and motorcycles was comparable, indicating robust features in both YOLO versions. This research contributes to the field by delineating the strengths and limitations of these models and providing insights into their practical applications in real-world scenarios. It enhances understanding of how different YOLO architectures can be optimized for specific vehicle detection tasks, thus supporting the development of more efficient and precise detection systems.
AB - Accurate vehicle detection is crucial for the advancement of intelligent transportation systems, including autonomous driving and traffic monitoring. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two advanced deep learning models—YOLOv8 and YOLOv10—focusing on their efficacy in vehicle detection across multiple classes such as bicycles, buses, cars, motorcycles, and trucks. Using a range of performance metrics, including precision, recall, F1 score, and detailed confusion matrices, we evaluate the performance characteristics of each model.The findings reveal that YOLOv10 generally outperformed YOLOv8, particularly in detecting smaller and more complex vehicles like bicycles and trucks, which can be attributed to its architectural enhancements. Conversely, YOLOv8 showed a slight advantage in car detection, underscoring subtle differences in feature processing between the models. The performance for detecting buses and motorcycles was comparable, indicating robust features in both YOLO versions. This research contributes to the field by delineating the strengths and limitations of these models and providing insights into their practical applications in real-world scenarios. It enhances understanding of how different YOLO architectures can be optimized for specific vehicle detection tasks, thus supporting the development of more efficient and precise detection systems.
KW - YOLO architectures
KW - vehicle detection
KW - deep learning
KW - performance comparison
KW - object classification
KW - autonomous driving
KW - intelligent transportation systems
KW - machine learning models
KW - precision and recall
KW - confusion matrix
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203795001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/vehicles6030065
DO - 10.3390/vehicles6030065
M3 - Article
VL - 6
SP - 1364
EP - 1382
JO - Vehicles
JF - Vehicles
SN - 2624-8921
IS - 3
ER -