TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Performance Evaluation of YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11 for Solar Panel Defect Detection
AU - Khanam, Rahima
AU - Asghar, Tahreem
AU - Hussain, Muhammad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/3/1
Y1 - 2025/3/1
N2 - The reliable operation of photovoltaic (PV) systems is essential for sustainable energy production, yet their efficiency is often compromised by defects such as bird droppings, cracks, and dust accumulation. Automated defect detection is critical for addressing these challenges in large-scale solar farms, where manual inspections are impractical. This study evaluates three YOLO object detection models—YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11—on a comprehensive dataset to identify solar panel defects. YOLOv5 achieved the fastest inference time (7.1 ms per image) and high precision (94.1%) for cracked panels. YOLOv8 excelled in recall for rare defects, such as bird drops (79.2%), while YOLOv11 delivered the highest [email protected] (93.4%), demonstrating a balanced performance across the defect categories. Despite the strong performance for common defects like dusty panels ([email protected] > 98%), bird drop detection posed challenges due to dataset imbalances. These results highlight the trade-offs between accuracy and computational efficiency, providing actionable insights for deploying automated defect detection systems to enhance PV system reliability and scalability.
AB - The reliable operation of photovoltaic (PV) systems is essential for sustainable energy production, yet their efficiency is often compromised by defects such as bird droppings, cracks, and dust accumulation. Automated defect detection is critical for addressing these challenges in large-scale solar farms, where manual inspections are impractical. This study evaluates three YOLO object detection models—YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11—on a comprehensive dataset to identify solar panel defects. YOLOv5 achieved the fastest inference time (7.1 ms per image) and high precision (94.1%) for cracked panels. YOLOv8 excelled in recall for rare defects, such as bird drops (79.2%), while YOLOv11 delivered the highest [email protected] (93.4%), demonstrating a balanced performance across the defect categories. Despite the strong performance for common defects like dusty panels ([email protected] > 98%), bird drop detection posed challenges due to dataset imbalances. These results highlight the trade-offs between accuracy and computational efficiency, providing actionable insights for deploying automated defect detection systems to enhance PV system reliability and scalability.
KW - automated inspection
KW - computational efficiency
KW - convolutional neural networks
KW - deep learning
KW - object detection
KW - photovoltaics
KW - solar panel defect detection
KW - YOLO models
KW - YOLO object detection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001395758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/solar5010006
DO - 10.3390/solar5010006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001395758
VL - 5
JO - Solar
JF - Solar
SN - 2673-9941
IS - 1
M1 - 6
ER -