Comparative reflections upon the Assisted Dying Bill 2013: A plea for a more European approach

Samantha Halliday

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Whilst assisted dying remains topical, a number of courts and committees have considered the potential legalisation of active voluntary euthanasia, and/or physician-assisted suicide, but concluded that legalisation should not occur. Significantly this conclusion is attributed not simply to concern to uphold the sanctity of life, but more commonly the reasons given stress that it would simply not be possible to legalise assisted dying whilst incorporating sufficient safeguards within the legislation to protect the vulnerable. This article considers the way in which the principle of dignity has been asserted to demand both that a person has a right to die with dignity (where dignity is constructed as entailing a choice to die with medical assistance) and that the prohibition of assisted dying be maintained in order to ensure the dignity of the person, regardless of whether that person is disabled or terminally ill. It assesses the validity of that argument by evaluating the safeguards incorporated into the Assisted Dying Bill 2013 and reflecting upon the experience of the statutory regulation of assisted dying in other jurisdictions: the Netherlands, Belgium and Oregon. It is concluded that it is possible to construct legislation authorising assisted dying in strictly controlled circumstances and that far from exposing the vulnerable to the risk of abuse, such regulation would provide much greater protection of all lives than the current system based upon an absolute prohibition of killing.
LanguageEnglish
Pages135-167
Number of pages33
JournalMedical Law International
Volume13
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

dying
legalization
human being
legislation
regulation
assisted suicide
euthanasia
Belgium
jurisdiction
Netherlands
abuse
assistance
physician
demand
experience

Cite this

@article{7ce6fdb16a924bc7b22195ea738befcd,
title = "Comparative reflections upon the Assisted Dying Bill 2013: A plea for a more European approach",
abstract = "Whilst assisted dying remains topical, a number of courts and committees have considered the potential legalisation of active voluntary euthanasia, and/or physician-assisted suicide, but concluded that legalisation should not occur. Significantly this conclusion is attributed not simply to concern to uphold the sanctity of life, but more commonly the reasons given stress that it would simply not be possible to legalise assisted dying whilst incorporating sufficient safeguards within the legislation to protect the vulnerable. This article considers the way in which the principle of dignity has been asserted to demand both that a person has a right to die with dignity (where dignity is constructed as entailing a choice to die with medical assistance) and that the prohibition of assisted dying be maintained in order to ensure the dignity of the person, regardless of whether that person is disabled or terminally ill. It assesses the validity of that argument by evaluating the safeguards incorporated into the Assisted Dying Bill 2013 and reflecting upon the experience of the statutory regulation of assisted dying in other jurisdictions: the Netherlands, Belgium and Oregon. It is concluded that it is possible to construct legislation authorising assisted dying in strictly controlled circumstances and that far from exposing the vulnerable to the risk of abuse, such regulation would provide much greater protection of all lives than the current system based upon an absolute prohibition of killing.",
keywords = "Assisted dying, Assisted suicide, Euthanasia, dignity, law, comparative",
author = "Samantha Halliday",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/0968533213508129",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "135--167",
journal = "Medical Law International",
issn = "0968-5332",
publisher = "A B Academic Publishers",
number = "2-3",

}

Comparative reflections upon the Assisted Dying Bill 2013 : A plea for a more European approach. / Halliday, Samantha.

In: Medical Law International, Vol. 13, No. 2-3, 2013, p. 135-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative reflections upon the Assisted Dying Bill 2013

T2 - Medical Law International

AU - Halliday, Samantha

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Whilst assisted dying remains topical, a number of courts and committees have considered the potential legalisation of active voluntary euthanasia, and/or physician-assisted suicide, but concluded that legalisation should not occur. Significantly this conclusion is attributed not simply to concern to uphold the sanctity of life, but more commonly the reasons given stress that it would simply not be possible to legalise assisted dying whilst incorporating sufficient safeguards within the legislation to protect the vulnerable. This article considers the way in which the principle of dignity has been asserted to demand both that a person has a right to die with dignity (where dignity is constructed as entailing a choice to die with medical assistance) and that the prohibition of assisted dying be maintained in order to ensure the dignity of the person, regardless of whether that person is disabled or terminally ill. It assesses the validity of that argument by evaluating the safeguards incorporated into the Assisted Dying Bill 2013 and reflecting upon the experience of the statutory regulation of assisted dying in other jurisdictions: the Netherlands, Belgium and Oregon. It is concluded that it is possible to construct legislation authorising assisted dying in strictly controlled circumstances and that far from exposing the vulnerable to the risk of abuse, such regulation would provide much greater protection of all lives than the current system based upon an absolute prohibition of killing.

AB - Whilst assisted dying remains topical, a number of courts and committees have considered the potential legalisation of active voluntary euthanasia, and/or physician-assisted suicide, but concluded that legalisation should not occur. Significantly this conclusion is attributed not simply to concern to uphold the sanctity of life, but more commonly the reasons given stress that it would simply not be possible to legalise assisted dying whilst incorporating sufficient safeguards within the legislation to protect the vulnerable. This article considers the way in which the principle of dignity has been asserted to demand both that a person has a right to die with dignity (where dignity is constructed as entailing a choice to die with medical assistance) and that the prohibition of assisted dying be maintained in order to ensure the dignity of the person, regardless of whether that person is disabled or terminally ill. It assesses the validity of that argument by evaluating the safeguards incorporated into the Assisted Dying Bill 2013 and reflecting upon the experience of the statutory regulation of assisted dying in other jurisdictions: the Netherlands, Belgium and Oregon. It is concluded that it is possible to construct legislation authorising assisted dying in strictly controlled circumstances and that far from exposing the vulnerable to the risk of abuse, such regulation would provide much greater protection of all lives than the current system based upon an absolute prohibition of killing.

KW - Assisted dying

KW - Assisted suicide

KW - Euthanasia

KW - dignity

KW - law

KW - comparative

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/home/mli

U2 - 10.1177/0968533213508129

DO - 10.1177/0968533213508129

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 135

EP - 167

JO - Medical Law International

JF - Medical Law International

SN - 0968-5332

IS - 2-3

ER -