Comparing production design activities and location-based planning tools

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

What are the differences between production system design and work structuring? And between phase scheduling and work structuring? Which lean planning tool is better suited for each one of these design processes: line of balance, takt-time planning or flowline? This paper aims to answer these questions through a comparison and deeper understanding of production design processes, as well as the potential uses of location-based tools for production planning and control in each design effort. The method used is the literature review analyses on main lean terms and tools applied for production system design. With a better comprehension of the terms and tools, it is expected that academics and lean practitioners will be able to apply lean construction in a more aware and sensible manner. The results will also support researcher's decision about the most suitable lean tool to apply in the case studies in different production design processes.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLC3 2017
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)
EditorsKen Walsh, Rafael Sacks, Ioannis Brilakis
PublisherThe International Group for Lean Construction
Pages705-712
Number of pages8
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017
Event25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction - Hersonissos, Heraklion, Greece
Duration: 9 Jul 201712 Jul 2017
Conference number: 25
http://iglc.net/Papers/Conference/27 (Link to Conference Website )

Conference

Conference25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction
Abbreviated titleIGLC25
CountryGreece
CityHeraklion
Period9/07/1712/07/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

Planning
Systems analysis
Flowlines
Scheduling

Cite this

Biotto, C., Kagioglou, M., Koskela, L., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2017). Comparing production design activities and location-based planning tools. In K. Walsh, R. Sacks, & I. Brilakis (Eds.), LC3 2017: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC) (Vol. 2, pp. 705-712). The International Group for Lean Construction. https://doi.org/10.24928/2017/0176
Biotto, Clarissa ; Kagioglou, Mike ; Koskela, Lauri ; Tzortzopoulos, Patricia. / Comparing production design activities and location-based planning tools. LC3 2017: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). editor / Ken Walsh ; Rafael Sacks ; Ioannis Brilakis. Vol. 2 The International Group for Lean Construction, 2017. pp. 705-712
@inproceedings{2adff18473644af192d08b90606c173e,
title = "Comparing production design activities and location-based planning tools",
abstract = "What are the differences between production system design and work structuring? And between phase scheduling and work structuring? Which lean planning tool is better suited for each one of these design processes: line of balance, takt-time planning or flowline? This paper aims to answer these questions through a comparison and deeper understanding of production design processes, as well as the potential uses of location-based tools for production planning and control in each design effort. The method used is the literature review analyses on main lean terms and tools applied for production system design. With a better comprehension of the terms and tools, it is expected that academics and lean practitioners will be able to apply lean construction in a more aware and sensible manner. The results will also support researcher's decision about the most suitable lean tool to apply in the case studies in different production design processes.",
keywords = "Flowline, Line of balance, Phase scheduling, Production design, Takt-time planning, Work structuring",
author = "Clarissa Biotto and Mike Kagioglou and Lauri Koskela and Patricia Tzortzopoulos",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.24928/2017/0176",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "705--712",
editor = "Ken Walsh and Rafael Sacks and Ioannis Brilakis",
booktitle = "LC3 2017",
publisher = "The International Group for Lean Construction",

}

Biotto, C, Kagioglou, M, Koskela, L & Tzortzopoulos, P 2017, Comparing production design activities and location-based planning tools. in K Walsh, R Sacks & I Brilakis (eds), LC3 2017: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). vol. 2, The International Group for Lean Construction, pp. 705-712, 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Heraklion, Greece, 9/07/17. https://doi.org/10.24928/2017/0176

Comparing production design activities and location-based planning tools. / Biotto, Clarissa; Kagioglou, Mike; Koskela, Lauri; Tzortzopoulos, Patricia.

LC3 2017: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). ed. / Ken Walsh; Rafael Sacks; Ioannis Brilakis. Vol. 2 The International Group for Lean Construction, 2017. p. 705-712.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing production design activities and location-based planning tools

AU - Biotto, Clarissa

AU - Kagioglou, Mike

AU - Koskela, Lauri

AU - Tzortzopoulos, Patricia

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - What are the differences between production system design and work structuring? And between phase scheduling and work structuring? Which lean planning tool is better suited for each one of these design processes: line of balance, takt-time planning or flowline? This paper aims to answer these questions through a comparison and deeper understanding of production design processes, as well as the potential uses of location-based tools for production planning and control in each design effort. The method used is the literature review analyses on main lean terms and tools applied for production system design. With a better comprehension of the terms and tools, it is expected that academics and lean practitioners will be able to apply lean construction in a more aware and sensible manner. The results will also support researcher's decision about the most suitable lean tool to apply in the case studies in different production design processes.

AB - What are the differences between production system design and work structuring? And between phase scheduling and work structuring? Which lean planning tool is better suited for each one of these design processes: line of balance, takt-time planning or flowline? This paper aims to answer these questions through a comparison and deeper understanding of production design processes, as well as the potential uses of location-based tools for production planning and control in each design effort. The method used is the literature review analyses on main lean terms and tools applied for production system design. With a better comprehension of the terms and tools, it is expected that academics and lean practitioners will be able to apply lean construction in a more aware and sensible manner. The results will also support researcher's decision about the most suitable lean tool to apply in the case studies in different production design processes.

KW - Flowline

KW - Line of balance

KW - Phase scheduling

KW - Production design

KW - Takt-time planning

KW - Work structuring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029598421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.24928/2017/0176

DO - 10.24928/2017/0176

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 2

SP - 705

EP - 712

BT - LC3 2017

A2 - Walsh, Ken

A2 - Sacks, Rafael

A2 - Brilakis, Ioannis

PB - The International Group for Lean Construction

ER -

Biotto C, Kagioglou M, Koskela L, Tzortzopoulos P. Comparing production design activities and location-based planning tools. In Walsh K, Sacks R, Brilakis I, editors, LC3 2017: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Vol. 2. The International Group for Lean Construction. 2017. p. 705-712 https://doi.org/10.24928/2017/0176