Comparison between multiobjective population-based algorithms in mechanical problem

H. E. Radhi, S. M. Barrans

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to perform a comparative study among multiobjective optimization methods on practical problem by using modeFRONTIER optimization software, to determine the efficiency of each method. In order to measure the effectiveness and competence of each method, the lifting arm problem was chosen from the literature [1]. Two numerical performance metrics and one visual criterion were chosen for qualitative and quantitative comparisons:(1) the variance of solution distribution in the Pareto optimal regions, (2) the ratio between the number of resulting Pareto front members to total numbers fitness function calculations which is denoted by hit rate [2], and lastly (3) graphical representation of the Pareto fronts for discussion. These metrics were chosen to represent the quality, as well as speed of the algorithms by ensuring well extends solutions. The definition of the variance as the sum of the square difference between the distance of each Pareto solutions and the average distance between Pareto solutions, over the total number of Pareto solutions. Comparisons among the results obtained using different algorithms have been performed to verify their performance. The experiments carried out indicate that FMOGA-II obtains remarkable results regarding all metrics used.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Subtitle of host publicationICMAE2011
EditorsWu Fan
PublisherScientific.net
Pages2383-2389
Number of pages7
Volume1
ISBN (Electronic)9783038137085
ISBN (Print)9783037852620
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2012
Event2nd International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering - Bangkok, Thailand
Duration: 29 Jul 201131 Jul 2011
Conference number: 2

Publication series

NameApplied Mechanics and Materials
Volume110-116
ISSN (Print)1660-9336
ISSN (Electronic)1662-7482

Conference

Conference2nd International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Abbreviated titleICMAE 2011
CountryThailand
CityBangkok
Period29/07/1131/07/11

Fingerprint

Multiobjective optimization
Experiments

Cite this

Radhi, H. E., & Barrans, S. M. (2012). Comparison between multiobjective population-based algorithms in mechanical problem. In W. Fan (Ed.), Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering: ICMAE2011 (Vol. 1, pp. 2383-2389). (Applied Mechanics and Materials; Vol. 110-116). Scientific.net. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.2383
Radhi, H. E. ; Barrans, S. M. / Comparison between multiobjective population-based algorithms in mechanical problem. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering: ICMAE2011. editor / Wu Fan. Vol. 1 Scientific.net, 2012. pp. 2383-2389 (Applied Mechanics and Materials).
@inproceedings{a376ec3bd3bb4f0dacd196214f9b1ea0,
title = "Comparison between multiobjective population-based algorithms in mechanical problem",
abstract = "The objective of this paper was to perform a comparative study among multiobjective optimization methods on practical problem by using modeFRONTIER optimization software, to determine the efficiency of each method. In order to measure the effectiveness and competence of each method, the lifting arm problem was chosen from the literature [1]. Two numerical performance metrics and one visual criterion were chosen for qualitative and quantitative comparisons:(1) the variance of solution distribution in the Pareto optimal regions, (2) the ratio between the number of resulting Pareto front members to total numbers fitness function calculations which is denoted by hit rate [2], and lastly (3) graphical representation of the Pareto fronts for discussion. These metrics were chosen to represent the quality, as well as speed of the algorithms by ensuring well extends solutions. The definition of the variance as the sum of the square difference between the distance of each Pareto solutions and the average distance between Pareto solutions, over the total number of Pareto solutions. Comparisons among the results obtained using different algorithms have been performed to verify their performance. The experiments carried out indicate that FMOGA-II obtains remarkable results regarding all metrics used.",
keywords = "Genetic algorithms, MOPSO, MOSA, Multiobjective optimization",
author = "Radhi, {H. E.} and Barrans, {S. M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.2383",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783037852620",
volume = "1",
series = "Applied Mechanics and Materials",
publisher = "Scientific.net",
pages = "2383--2389",
editor = "Wu Fan",
booktitle = "Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering",
address = "Switzerland",

}

Radhi, HE & Barrans, SM 2012, Comparison between multiobjective population-based algorithms in mechanical problem. in W Fan (ed.), Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering: ICMAE2011. vol. 1, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 110-116, Scientific.net, pp. 2383-2389, 2nd International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand, 29/07/11. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.2383

Comparison between multiobjective population-based algorithms in mechanical problem. / Radhi, H. E.; Barrans, S. M.

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering: ICMAE2011. ed. / Wu Fan. Vol. 1 Scientific.net, 2012. p. 2383-2389 (Applied Mechanics and Materials; Vol. 110-116).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison between multiobjective population-based algorithms in mechanical problem

AU - Radhi, H. E.

AU - Barrans, S. M.

PY - 2012/2/28

Y1 - 2012/2/28

N2 - The objective of this paper was to perform a comparative study among multiobjective optimization methods on practical problem by using modeFRONTIER optimization software, to determine the efficiency of each method. In order to measure the effectiveness and competence of each method, the lifting arm problem was chosen from the literature [1]. Two numerical performance metrics and one visual criterion were chosen for qualitative and quantitative comparisons:(1) the variance of solution distribution in the Pareto optimal regions, (2) the ratio between the number of resulting Pareto front members to total numbers fitness function calculations which is denoted by hit rate [2], and lastly (3) graphical representation of the Pareto fronts for discussion. These metrics were chosen to represent the quality, as well as speed of the algorithms by ensuring well extends solutions. The definition of the variance as the sum of the square difference between the distance of each Pareto solutions and the average distance between Pareto solutions, over the total number of Pareto solutions. Comparisons among the results obtained using different algorithms have been performed to verify their performance. The experiments carried out indicate that FMOGA-II obtains remarkable results regarding all metrics used.

AB - The objective of this paper was to perform a comparative study among multiobjective optimization methods on practical problem by using modeFRONTIER optimization software, to determine the efficiency of each method. In order to measure the effectiveness and competence of each method, the lifting arm problem was chosen from the literature [1]. Two numerical performance metrics and one visual criterion were chosen for qualitative and quantitative comparisons:(1) the variance of solution distribution in the Pareto optimal regions, (2) the ratio between the number of resulting Pareto front members to total numbers fitness function calculations which is denoted by hit rate [2], and lastly (3) graphical representation of the Pareto fronts for discussion. These metrics were chosen to represent the quality, as well as speed of the algorithms by ensuring well extends solutions. The definition of the variance as the sum of the square difference between the distance of each Pareto solutions and the average distance between Pareto solutions, over the total number of Pareto solutions. Comparisons among the results obtained using different algorithms have been performed to verify their performance. The experiments carried out indicate that FMOGA-II obtains remarkable results regarding all metrics used.

KW - Genetic algorithms

KW - MOPSO

KW - MOSA

KW - Multiobjective optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81255188633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.2383

DO - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.2383

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783037852620

VL - 1

T3 - Applied Mechanics and Materials

SP - 2383

EP - 2389

BT - Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

A2 - Fan, Wu

PB - Scientific.net

ER -

Radhi HE, Barrans SM. Comparison between multiobjective population-based algorithms in mechanical problem. In Fan W, editor, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering: ICMAE2011. Vol. 1. Scientific.net. 2012. p. 2383-2389. (Applied Mechanics and Materials). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.110-116.2383