Comparison of murderers with recidivists and first time incarcerated offenders from U.S. prisons on psychopathy and identity as a criminal

An exploratory analysis

Nicole Sherretts, Daniel Boduszek, Agata Debowska, Dominic Willmott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Previous research conceptualized murderers as highly callous and self-gratifying individuals, offending as a result of psychopathic tendencies. The current exploration sought to verify whether murderers differ on psychopathy and criminal social identity from recidivistic and first time incarcerated offenders. Methods: The study compared an opportunistic sample of murderers (n = 94), recidivists (n = 266), and first time offenders (n = 118) on criminal social identity (3 factors: cognitive centrality, in-group affect, and in-group ties) and psychopathy (4 factors: callous affect, interpersonal manipulation, erratic lifestyle, antisocial behavior). Results: Recidivists scored significantly higher on cognitive centrality and in-group ties than murderers. Recidivists scored significantly higher than first time incarcerated offenders or murderers on the erratic lifestyle and interpersonal manipulation factors of psychopathy. Additionally, recidivists scored significantly higher on antisocial behavior compared to first time offenders. All three groups of prisoners did not differ in terms of callous affect. Conclusion: Contrary to previous research and media portrayals of homicide perpetration being rooted in psychopathic tendencies such as callous affect, the present findings found no support for such a conceptualization of the crime. Moreover, unsurprisingly, it appears murderers have less developed criminal cognitions than other offending groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-92
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice
Volume51
Early online date2 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

repeat offender
Prisons
correctional institution
offender
Group
Social Identification
manipulation
Life Style
cognitive factors
prisoner
homicide
Prisoners
cognition
Homicide
Crime
offense
Research
Cognition

Cite this

@article{a659f0d534044db8b2cf18817309e35c,
title = "Comparison of murderers with recidivists and first time incarcerated offenders from U.S. prisons on psychopathy and identity as a criminal: An exploratory analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: Previous research conceptualized murderers as highly callous and self-gratifying individuals, offending as a result of psychopathic tendencies. The current exploration sought to verify whether murderers differ on psychopathy and criminal social identity from recidivistic and first time incarcerated offenders. Methods: The study compared an opportunistic sample of murderers (n = 94), recidivists (n = 266), and first time offenders (n = 118) on criminal social identity (3 factors: cognitive centrality, in-group affect, and in-group ties) and psychopathy (4 factors: callous affect, interpersonal manipulation, erratic lifestyle, antisocial behavior). Results: Recidivists scored significantly higher on cognitive centrality and in-group ties than murderers. Recidivists scored significantly higher than first time incarcerated offenders or murderers on the erratic lifestyle and interpersonal manipulation factors of psychopathy. Additionally, recidivists scored significantly higher on antisocial behavior compared to first time offenders. All three groups of prisoners did not differ in terms of callous affect. Conclusion: Contrary to previous research and media portrayals of homicide perpetration being rooted in psychopathic tendencies such as callous affect, the present findings found no support for such a conceptualization of the crime. Moreover, unsurprisingly, it appears murderers have less developed criminal cognitions than other offending groups.",
keywords = "Criminal social identity, First time incarcerated offenders, Murderers, Psychopathy, Recidivists",
author = "Nicole Sherretts and Daniel Boduszek and Agata Debowska and Dominic Willmott",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.03.002",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "89--92",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0047-2352",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Comparison of murderers with recidivists and first time incarcerated offenders from U.S. prisons on psychopathy and identity as a criminal : An exploratory analysis. / Sherretts, Nicole; Boduszek, Daniel; Debowska, Agata; Willmott, Dominic.

In: Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 51, 01.07.2017, p. 89-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of murderers with recidivists and first time incarcerated offenders from U.S. prisons on psychopathy and identity as a criminal

T2 - An exploratory analysis

AU - Sherretts, Nicole

AU - Boduszek, Daniel

AU - Debowska, Agata

AU - Willmott, Dominic

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Purpose: Previous research conceptualized murderers as highly callous and self-gratifying individuals, offending as a result of psychopathic tendencies. The current exploration sought to verify whether murderers differ on psychopathy and criminal social identity from recidivistic and first time incarcerated offenders. Methods: The study compared an opportunistic sample of murderers (n = 94), recidivists (n = 266), and first time offenders (n = 118) on criminal social identity (3 factors: cognitive centrality, in-group affect, and in-group ties) and psychopathy (4 factors: callous affect, interpersonal manipulation, erratic lifestyle, antisocial behavior). Results: Recidivists scored significantly higher on cognitive centrality and in-group ties than murderers. Recidivists scored significantly higher than first time incarcerated offenders or murderers on the erratic lifestyle and interpersonal manipulation factors of psychopathy. Additionally, recidivists scored significantly higher on antisocial behavior compared to first time offenders. All three groups of prisoners did not differ in terms of callous affect. Conclusion: Contrary to previous research and media portrayals of homicide perpetration being rooted in psychopathic tendencies such as callous affect, the present findings found no support for such a conceptualization of the crime. Moreover, unsurprisingly, it appears murderers have less developed criminal cognitions than other offending groups.

AB - Purpose: Previous research conceptualized murderers as highly callous and self-gratifying individuals, offending as a result of psychopathic tendencies. The current exploration sought to verify whether murderers differ on psychopathy and criminal social identity from recidivistic and first time incarcerated offenders. Methods: The study compared an opportunistic sample of murderers (n = 94), recidivists (n = 266), and first time offenders (n = 118) on criminal social identity (3 factors: cognitive centrality, in-group affect, and in-group ties) and psychopathy (4 factors: callous affect, interpersonal manipulation, erratic lifestyle, antisocial behavior). Results: Recidivists scored significantly higher on cognitive centrality and in-group ties than murderers. Recidivists scored significantly higher than first time incarcerated offenders or murderers on the erratic lifestyle and interpersonal manipulation factors of psychopathy. Additionally, recidivists scored significantly higher on antisocial behavior compared to first time offenders. All three groups of prisoners did not differ in terms of callous affect. Conclusion: Contrary to previous research and media portrayals of homicide perpetration being rooted in psychopathic tendencies such as callous affect, the present findings found no support for such a conceptualization of the crime. Moreover, unsurprisingly, it appears murderers have less developed criminal cognitions than other offending groups.

KW - Criminal social identity

KW - First time incarcerated offenders

KW - Murderers

KW - Psychopathy

KW - Recidivists

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016412744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.03.002

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 89

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

ER -