Competence across Europe

highest common factor or lowest common denominator?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to explore diversity in competence models across Europe and consider the extent to which there is sufficient common ground for a common European approach to underpin the European Qualifications Framework. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a literature review and interviews with policy makers. Findings Despite the central role of competence in policy initiatives, conceptual approaches to competence vary not only between but also within different member states. This diversity embodies not only language issues but also fundamental cultural differences in approaches to skill formation. Whether the models have sufficient common ground to permit a “bestfit” Europeanwide approach is open to question, although this is clearly an essential prerequisite for removing barriers to labour mobility. Despite initiatives like the European Qualifications Framework there is still no consensus for adopting a common competence model and policy discussions continue to reveal confusion. Research limitations/implications The focus on policy discussions at the European level may be a limitation, and readers should see this as the introductory scene setting to more detailed discussions in the following papers of important developments within member states. Beyond this, much is happening at the level of sectors and occupations that is the focus for practical implementation. Practical implications The paper highlights the urgent need to develop a coherent conceptual underpinning for competence descriptors in qualifications frameworks that will work as a bestfit approach across Europe. Without this, occupational and intersector mobility will be hindered. Originality/value The paper offers the most comprehensive assessment of European approaches to competence to date.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)681-700
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of European Industrial Training
Volume33
Issue number8/9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

labor mobility
cultural difference
qualification
Europe
Common factors
literature review
occupation
labor
methodology
interview
language
policy
Values
Qualification
European Qualifications Framework
literature
Skill formation
Design methodology
Politicians
Labour mobility

Cite this

@article{7d076bdbb245496ab6a56c18657e91ea,
title = "Competence across Europe: highest common factor or lowest common denominator?",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this article is to explore diversity in competence models across Europe and consider the extent to which there is sufficient common ground for a common European approach to underpin the European Qualifications Framework. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a literature review and interviews with policy makers. Findings Despite the central role of competence in policy initiatives, conceptual approaches to competence vary not only between but also within different member states. This diversity embodies not only language issues but also fundamental cultural differences in approaches to skill formation. Whether the models have sufficient common ground to permit a “bestfit” Europeanwide approach is open to question, although this is clearly an essential prerequisite for removing barriers to labour mobility. Despite initiatives like the European Qualifications Framework there is still no consensus for adopting a common competence model and policy discussions continue to reveal confusion. Research limitations/implications The focus on policy discussions at the European level may be a limitation, and readers should see this as the introductory scene setting to more detailed discussions in the following papers of important developments within member states. Beyond this, much is happening at the level of sectors and occupations that is the focus for practical implementation. Practical implications The paper highlights the urgent need to develop a coherent conceptual underpinning for competence descriptors in qualifications frameworks that will work as a bestfit approach across Europe. Without this, occupational and intersector mobility will be hindered. Originality/value The paper offers the most comprehensive assessment of European approaches to competence to date.",
keywords = "Competences, Qualifications, Skills",
author = "Jonathan Winterton",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1108/03090590910993571",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "681--700",
journal = "European Journal of Training and Development",
issn = "2046-9012",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8/9",

}

Competence across Europe : highest common factor or lowest common denominator? / Winterton, Jonathan.

In: Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 33, No. 8/9, 25.09.2009, p. 681-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competence across Europe

T2 - highest common factor or lowest common denominator?

AU - Winterton, Jonathan

PY - 2009/9/25

Y1 - 2009/9/25

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this article is to explore diversity in competence models across Europe and consider the extent to which there is sufficient common ground for a common European approach to underpin the European Qualifications Framework. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a literature review and interviews with policy makers. Findings Despite the central role of competence in policy initiatives, conceptual approaches to competence vary not only between but also within different member states. This diversity embodies not only language issues but also fundamental cultural differences in approaches to skill formation. Whether the models have sufficient common ground to permit a “bestfit” Europeanwide approach is open to question, although this is clearly an essential prerequisite for removing barriers to labour mobility. Despite initiatives like the European Qualifications Framework there is still no consensus for adopting a common competence model and policy discussions continue to reveal confusion. Research limitations/implications The focus on policy discussions at the European level may be a limitation, and readers should see this as the introductory scene setting to more detailed discussions in the following papers of important developments within member states. Beyond this, much is happening at the level of sectors and occupations that is the focus for practical implementation. Practical implications The paper highlights the urgent need to develop a coherent conceptual underpinning for competence descriptors in qualifications frameworks that will work as a bestfit approach across Europe. Without this, occupational and intersector mobility will be hindered. Originality/value The paper offers the most comprehensive assessment of European approaches to competence to date.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this article is to explore diversity in competence models across Europe and consider the extent to which there is sufficient common ground for a common European approach to underpin the European Qualifications Framework. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a literature review and interviews with policy makers. Findings Despite the central role of competence in policy initiatives, conceptual approaches to competence vary not only between but also within different member states. This diversity embodies not only language issues but also fundamental cultural differences in approaches to skill formation. Whether the models have sufficient common ground to permit a “bestfit” Europeanwide approach is open to question, although this is clearly an essential prerequisite for removing barriers to labour mobility. Despite initiatives like the European Qualifications Framework there is still no consensus for adopting a common competence model and policy discussions continue to reveal confusion. Research limitations/implications The focus on policy discussions at the European level may be a limitation, and readers should see this as the introductory scene setting to more detailed discussions in the following papers of important developments within member states. Beyond this, much is happening at the level of sectors and occupations that is the focus for practical implementation. Practical implications The paper highlights the urgent need to develop a coherent conceptual underpinning for competence descriptors in qualifications frameworks that will work as a bestfit approach across Europe. Without this, occupational and intersector mobility will be hindered. Originality/value The paper offers the most comprehensive assessment of European approaches to competence to date.

KW - Competences

KW - Qualifications

KW - Skills

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72149097325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/03090590910993571

DO - 10.1108/03090590910993571

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 681

EP - 700

JO - European Journal of Training and Development

JF - European Journal of Training and Development

SN - 2046-9012

IS - 8/9

ER -