Complementary therapies in cancer

Patients' views on their purposes and value pre and post receipt of complementary therapy-A multi-centre case study

Dai Roberts, Charlotte Wilson, Chris Todd, Andrew F. Long, Peter Mackereth, Jacqui Stringer, Ann Carter, Sam Parkin, Ann Louise Caress

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Complementary therapy (CT) use amongst cancer patients is common and increasing. Further understanding of why cancer patients choose to have CTs and their expected benefits is needed. Methods: The aim was to compare cancer patients' expectations/attitudes regarding CTs pre- and post-CT. Multiple case study method (after Yin) was employed; this paper reports data from self-completed questionnaires completed before and after receipt of CTs by 113 patients from three cancer centres in North-West England (one hospice; one specialist cancer hospital and one community-based cancer support centre, all providing a range of CTs). Results: Expectations regarding potential benefits of CTs primarily related to psychosocial issues (91 comments). Fewer patients sought CTs for physical symptom relief (30 comments). Attitudes to CTs were positive both before and after therapy. CTs typically met or exceeded patients' expectations (99/113, 88%). There was no indication that patients were turning to CTs due to disillusionment with conventional treatment. Most viewed CTs as 'something extra' (pre-CT 77/108, 68%; post-CT 86/113, 76%), rather than 'integral' to treatment (pre-CT 11/108, 10%; post-CT 19/113, 17%). Conclusion: Patients had clear expectations of CTs, which were primarily related to psycho-social issues, both pre- and post-CT. Most patients were satisfied with CTs and perceived them as beneficial. However, few viewed CTs as integral to their cancer care. The data highlight a tension between needs or demand-led and evidence-based care provision. The exact role and unique contribution of CTs within cancer supportive care services needs further research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-449
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Neoplasms
Cancer Care Facilities
Hospices
England
Self Report
Therapeutics
Research

Cite this

Roberts, Dai ; Wilson, Charlotte ; Todd, Chris ; Long, Andrew F. ; Mackereth, Peter ; Stringer, Jacqui ; Carter, Ann ; Parkin, Sam ; Caress, Ann Louise. / Complementary therapies in cancer : Patients' views on their purposes and value pre and post receipt of complementary therapy-A multi-centre case study. In: European Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 5, No. 5. pp. 443-449.
@article{a578109227b44eb8a162a19997ad5e66,
title = "Complementary therapies in cancer: Patients' views on their purposes and value pre and post receipt of complementary therapy-A multi-centre case study",
abstract = "Introduction: Complementary therapy (CT) use amongst cancer patients is common and increasing. Further understanding of why cancer patients choose to have CTs and their expected benefits is needed. Methods: The aim was to compare cancer patients' expectations/attitudes regarding CTs pre- and post-CT. Multiple case study method (after Yin) was employed; this paper reports data from self-completed questionnaires completed before and after receipt of CTs by 113 patients from three cancer centres in North-West England (one hospice; one specialist cancer hospital and one community-based cancer support centre, all providing a range of CTs). Results: Expectations regarding potential benefits of CTs primarily related to psychosocial issues (91 comments). Fewer patients sought CTs for physical symptom relief (30 comments). Attitudes to CTs were positive both before and after therapy. CTs typically met or exceeded patients' expectations (99/113, 88{\%}). There was no indication that patients were turning to CTs due to disillusionment with conventional treatment. Most viewed CTs as 'something extra' (pre-CT 77/108, 68{\%}; post-CT 86/113, 76{\%}), rather than 'integral' to treatment (pre-CT 11/108, 10{\%}; post-CT 19/113, 17{\%}). Conclusion: Patients had clear expectations of CTs, which were primarily related to psycho-social issues, both pre- and post-CT. Most patients were satisfied with CTs and perceived them as beneficial. However, few viewed CTs as integral to their cancer care. The data highlight a tension between needs or demand-led and evidence-based care provision. The exact role and unique contribution of CTs within cancer supportive care services needs further research.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Cancer, Complementary therapy, Expectations, Experiences, Palliative care",
author = "Dai Roberts and Charlotte Wilson and Chris Todd and Long, {Andrew F.} and Peter Mackereth and Jacqui Stringer and Ann Carter and Sam Parkin and Caress, {Ann Louise}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eujim.2013.06.005",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "443--449",
journal = "European Journal of Integrative Medicine",
issn = "1876-3820",
publisher = "Elsevier GmbH",
number = "5",

}

Complementary therapies in cancer : Patients' views on their purposes and value pre and post receipt of complementary therapy-A multi-centre case study. / Roberts, Dai; Wilson, Charlotte; Todd, Chris; Long, Andrew F.; Mackereth, Peter; Stringer, Jacqui; Carter, Ann; Parkin, Sam; Caress, Ann Louise.

In: European Journal of Integrative Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 5, 01.10.2013, p. 443-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complementary therapies in cancer

T2 - Patients' views on their purposes and value pre and post receipt of complementary therapy-A multi-centre case study

AU - Roberts, Dai

AU - Wilson, Charlotte

AU - Todd, Chris

AU - Long, Andrew F.

AU - Mackereth, Peter

AU - Stringer, Jacqui

AU - Carter, Ann

AU - Parkin, Sam

AU - Caress, Ann Louise

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - Introduction: Complementary therapy (CT) use amongst cancer patients is common and increasing. Further understanding of why cancer patients choose to have CTs and their expected benefits is needed. Methods: The aim was to compare cancer patients' expectations/attitudes regarding CTs pre- and post-CT. Multiple case study method (after Yin) was employed; this paper reports data from self-completed questionnaires completed before and after receipt of CTs by 113 patients from three cancer centres in North-West England (one hospice; one specialist cancer hospital and one community-based cancer support centre, all providing a range of CTs). Results: Expectations regarding potential benefits of CTs primarily related to psychosocial issues (91 comments). Fewer patients sought CTs for physical symptom relief (30 comments). Attitudes to CTs were positive both before and after therapy. CTs typically met or exceeded patients' expectations (99/113, 88%). There was no indication that patients were turning to CTs due to disillusionment with conventional treatment. Most viewed CTs as 'something extra' (pre-CT 77/108, 68%; post-CT 86/113, 76%), rather than 'integral' to treatment (pre-CT 11/108, 10%; post-CT 19/113, 17%). Conclusion: Patients had clear expectations of CTs, which were primarily related to psycho-social issues, both pre- and post-CT. Most patients were satisfied with CTs and perceived them as beneficial. However, few viewed CTs as integral to their cancer care. The data highlight a tension between needs or demand-led and evidence-based care provision. The exact role and unique contribution of CTs within cancer supportive care services needs further research.

AB - Introduction: Complementary therapy (CT) use amongst cancer patients is common and increasing. Further understanding of why cancer patients choose to have CTs and their expected benefits is needed. Methods: The aim was to compare cancer patients' expectations/attitudes regarding CTs pre- and post-CT. Multiple case study method (after Yin) was employed; this paper reports data from self-completed questionnaires completed before and after receipt of CTs by 113 patients from three cancer centres in North-West England (one hospice; one specialist cancer hospital and one community-based cancer support centre, all providing a range of CTs). Results: Expectations regarding potential benefits of CTs primarily related to psychosocial issues (91 comments). Fewer patients sought CTs for physical symptom relief (30 comments). Attitudes to CTs were positive both before and after therapy. CTs typically met or exceeded patients' expectations (99/113, 88%). There was no indication that patients were turning to CTs due to disillusionment with conventional treatment. Most viewed CTs as 'something extra' (pre-CT 77/108, 68%; post-CT 86/113, 76%), rather than 'integral' to treatment (pre-CT 11/108, 10%; post-CT 19/113, 17%). Conclusion: Patients had clear expectations of CTs, which were primarily related to psycho-social issues, both pre- and post-CT. Most patients were satisfied with CTs and perceived them as beneficial. However, few viewed CTs as integral to their cancer care. The data highlight a tension between needs or demand-led and evidence-based care provision. The exact role and unique contribution of CTs within cancer supportive care services needs further research.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Cancer

KW - Complementary therapy

KW - Expectations

KW - Experiences

KW - Palliative care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887130318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eujim.2013.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.eujim.2013.06.005

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 443

EP - 449

JO - European Journal of Integrative Medicine

JF - European Journal of Integrative Medicine

SN - 1876-3820

IS - 5

ER -