Compound Interest and its Validity (or Invalidity) in the Bank-Customer Relationship: The State-of-the-Art of British Common Law Discussed by Virtue of a Comparative Analysis

Pierre de Gioia-Carabellese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Compound interest is a concept that, historically, has been tainted with an essentially mercantile flavour. It relates to the custom of banks in capitalising on the interest due by a client upon the expiry of a certain interval (the rest). Such practice, zealously vilified in some quarters whilst acclaimed as a prosperous enterprise in others, has been challenged more recently, at both judicial level and under statute, in the case of Italy. This contribution, in briefly recalling the origin of the concept of anatocism (the orthodox definition of compound interest) and, therefore, its Roman predecessor, the usurarum usurae and the futurarum usurarum usurarae (usurae), seeks to examine the state-of-the-art apparatus applicable to compound interest in the British common law. Such deliberations will thereupon give rise to what this paper aspires to describe as a peculiar development. In this respect, attention is drawn to the recent Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the manner in which the bank customer is theoretically entitled to rely upon it, with specific reference to the compound interest clause. As regards the 'Continental experience', the Italian jurisdiction, awash with judicial twists and incandescent doctrinal views on this topic, is discussed and analysed as a compelling and stimulating comparator.
LanguageEnglish
Pages174-200
Number of pages27
JournalLaw and Economics Yearly Review
Volume5
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

invalidity
common law
bank
customer
deliberation
statute
jurisdiction
Italy
act
experience
Common law
Customer relationship
Comparative analysis
Consumer rights
Twist
Jurisdiction
Deliberation
Statute

Cite this

@article{8e72ecea1bbf415c971325879d94dd02,
title = "Compound Interest and its Validity (or Invalidity) in the Bank-Customer Relationship: The State-of-the-Art of British Common Law Discussed by Virtue of a Comparative Analysis",
abstract = "Compound interest is a concept that, historically, has been tainted with an essentially mercantile flavour. It relates to the custom of banks in capitalising on the interest due by a client upon the expiry of a certain interval (the rest). Such practice, zealously vilified in some quarters whilst acclaimed as a prosperous enterprise in others, has been challenged more recently, at both judicial level and under statute, in the case of Italy. This contribution, in briefly recalling the origin of the concept of anatocism (the orthodox definition of compound interest) and, therefore, its Roman predecessor, the usurarum usurae and the futurarum usurarum usurarae (usurae), seeks to examine the state-of-the-art apparatus applicable to compound interest in the British common law. Such deliberations will thereupon give rise to what this paper aspires to describe as a peculiar development. In this respect, attention is drawn to the recent Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the manner in which the bank customer is theoretically entitled to rely upon it, with specific reference to the compound interest clause. As regards the 'Continental experience', the Italian jurisdiction, awash with judicial twists and incandescent doctrinal views on this topic, is discussed and analysed as a compelling and stimulating comparator.",
author = "Gioia-Carabellese, {Pierre de}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "174--200",
journal = "Law and Economics Yearly Review",
issn = "2050-9014",
publisher = "Queen Mary, University of London - School of Law",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compound Interest and its Validity (or Invalidity) in the Bank-Customer Relationship

T2 - Law and Economics Yearly Review

AU - Gioia-Carabellese, Pierre de

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Compound interest is a concept that, historically, has been tainted with an essentially mercantile flavour. It relates to the custom of banks in capitalising on the interest due by a client upon the expiry of a certain interval (the rest). Such practice, zealously vilified in some quarters whilst acclaimed as a prosperous enterprise in others, has been challenged more recently, at both judicial level and under statute, in the case of Italy. This contribution, in briefly recalling the origin of the concept of anatocism (the orthodox definition of compound interest) and, therefore, its Roman predecessor, the usurarum usurae and the futurarum usurarum usurarae (usurae), seeks to examine the state-of-the-art apparatus applicable to compound interest in the British common law. Such deliberations will thereupon give rise to what this paper aspires to describe as a peculiar development. In this respect, attention is drawn to the recent Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the manner in which the bank customer is theoretically entitled to rely upon it, with specific reference to the compound interest clause. As regards the 'Continental experience', the Italian jurisdiction, awash with judicial twists and incandescent doctrinal views on this topic, is discussed and analysed as a compelling and stimulating comparator.

AB - Compound interest is a concept that, historically, has been tainted with an essentially mercantile flavour. It relates to the custom of banks in capitalising on the interest due by a client upon the expiry of a certain interval (the rest). Such practice, zealously vilified in some quarters whilst acclaimed as a prosperous enterprise in others, has been challenged more recently, at both judicial level and under statute, in the case of Italy. This contribution, in briefly recalling the origin of the concept of anatocism (the orthodox definition of compound interest) and, therefore, its Roman predecessor, the usurarum usurae and the futurarum usurarum usurarae (usurae), seeks to examine the state-of-the-art apparatus applicable to compound interest in the British common law. Such deliberations will thereupon give rise to what this paper aspires to describe as a peculiar development. In this respect, attention is drawn to the recent Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the manner in which the bank customer is theoretically entitled to rely upon it, with specific reference to the compound interest clause. As regards the 'Continental experience', the Italian jurisdiction, awash with judicial twists and incandescent doctrinal views on this topic, is discussed and analysed as a compelling and stimulating comparator.

UR - http://www.laweconomicsyearlyreview.org.uk/

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84996848899&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Compound+Interest+and+its+Validity+in+the+Bank-Customer+Relationship&st2=&sid=cb8f919a6095a2d7cfb81362564d97c3&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=83&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28Compound+Interest+and+its+Validity+in+the+Bank-Customer+Relationship%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 174

EP - 200

JO - Law and Economics Yearly Review

JF - Law and Economics Yearly Review

SN - 2050-9014

IS - 1

ER -