Construct validity of the beck hopelessness scale (BHS) among university students

A multitrait-multimethod approach

Daniel Boduszek, Katie Dhingra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is considerable debate about the underlying factor structure of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) in the literature. An established view is that it reflects a unitary or bidimensional construct in nonclinical samples. There are, however, reasons to reconsider this conceptualization. Based on previous factor analytic findings from both clinical and nonclinical studies, the aim of the present study was to compare 16 competing models of the BHS in a large university student sample (N = 1, 733). Sixteen distinct factor models were specified and tested using conventional confirmatory factor analytic techniques, along with confirmatory bifactor modeling. A 3-factor solution with 2 method effects (i.e., a multitrait-multimethod model) provided the best fit to the data. The reliability of this conceptualization was supported by McDonald's coefficient omega and the differential relationships exhibited between the 3 hopelessness factors ("feelings about the future," "loss of motivation," and "future expectations") and measures of goal disengagement, brooding rumination, suicide ideation, and suicide attempt history. The results provide statistical support for a 3-trait and 2-method factor model, and hence the 3 dimensions of hopelessness theorized by Beck. The theoretical and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1325-1330
Number of pages6
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume28
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Suicide
Students
Motivation
Emotions
History
Clinical Studies

Cite this

@article{f0edb33b484f408295f1fab7f2d615c0,
title = "Construct validity of the beck hopelessness scale (BHS) among university students: A multitrait-multimethod approach",
abstract = "There is considerable debate about the underlying factor structure of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) in the literature. An established view is that it reflects a unitary or bidimensional construct in nonclinical samples. There are, however, reasons to reconsider this conceptualization. Based on previous factor analytic findings from both clinical and nonclinical studies, the aim of the present study was to compare 16 competing models of the BHS in a large university student sample (N = 1, 733). Sixteen distinct factor models were specified and tested using conventional confirmatory factor analytic techniques, along with confirmatory bifactor modeling. A 3-factor solution with 2 method effects (i.e., a multitrait-multimethod model) provided the best fit to the data. The reliability of this conceptualization was supported by McDonald's coefficient omega and the differential relationships exhibited between the 3 hopelessness factors ({"}feelings about the future,{"} {"}loss of motivation,{"} and {"}future expectations{"}) and measures of goal disengagement, brooding rumination, suicide ideation, and suicide attempt history. The results provide statistical support for a 3-trait and 2-method factor model, and hence the 3 dimensions of hopelessness theorized by Beck. The theoretical and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Beck hopelessness scale (BHS), Bifactor modeling, Confirmatory factor analysis, Multitrait- multimethod, Suicide",
author = "Daniel Boduszek and Katie Dhingra",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pas0000245",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1325--1330",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

Construct validity of the beck hopelessness scale (BHS) among university students : A multitrait-multimethod approach. / Boduszek, Daniel; Dhingra, Katie.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 28, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 1325-1330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construct validity of the beck hopelessness scale (BHS) among university students

T2 - A multitrait-multimethod approach

AU - Boduszek, Daniel

AU - Dhingra, Katie

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - There is considerable debate about the underlying factor structure of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) in the literature. An established view is that it reflects a unitary or bidimensional construct in nonclinical samples. There are, however, reasons to reconsider this conceptualization. Based on previous factor analytic findings from both clinical and nonclinical studies, the aim of the present study was to compare 16 competing models of the BHS in a large university student sample (N = 1, 733). Sixteen distinct factor models were specified and tested using conventional confirmatory factor analytic techniques, along with confirmatory bifactor modeling. A 3-factor solution with 2 method effects (i.e., a multitrait-multimethod model) provided the best fit to the data. The reliability of this conceptualization was supported by McDonald's coefficient omega and the differential relationships exhibited between the 3 hopelessness factors ("feelings about the future," "loss of motivation," and "future expectations") and measures of goal disengagement, brooding rumination, suicide ideation, and suicide attempt history. The results provide statistical support for a 3-trait and 2-method factor model, and hence the 3 dimensions of hopelessness theorized by Beck. The theoretical and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.

AB - There is considerable debate about the underlying factor structure of the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) in the literature. An established view is that it reflects a unitary or bidimensional construct in nonclinical samples. There are, however, reasons to reconsider this conceptualization. Based on previous factor analytic findings from both clinical and nonclinical studies, the aim of the present study was to compare 16 competing models of the BHS in a large university student sample (N = 1, 733). Sixteen distinct factor models were specified and tested using conventional confirmatory factor analytic techniques, along with confirmatory bifactor modeling. A 3-factor solution with 2 method effects (i.e., a multitrait-multimethod model) provided the best fit to the data. The reliability of this conceptualization was supported by McDonald's coefficient omega and the differential relationships exhibited between the 3 hopelessness factors ("feelings about the future," "loss of motivation," and "future expectations") and measures of goal disengagement, brooding rumination, suicide ideation, and suicide attempt history. The results provide statistical support for a 3-trait and 2-method factor model, and hence the 3 dimensions of hopelessness theorized by Beck. The theoretical and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.

KW - Beck hopelessness scale (BHS)

KW - Bifactor modeling

KW - Confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Multitrait- multimethod

KW - Suicide

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946887683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pas0000245

DO - 10.1037/pas0000245

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1325

EP - 1330

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 10

ER -