Contract cheating in UK higher education: A covert investigation of essay mills

Dominic Medway, Stuart Roper, Leah Gillooly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contract cheating is currently a concern for universities and the HE sector. It has been brought into the spotlight in recent years through the growth of online essay mills, where students can easily commission and purchase written assessment responses. This study contributes to the wider literature on academic integrity in HE by examining the phenomenon of contract cheating from a from a supply side perspective, thereby considering the essay mill offering and student interaction with it. The authors covertly engage with five essay mills, before successfully completing an assignment purchase with two of these providers. The pre-purchase stage of an assignment transaction is first examined, unpacking ten reassurance cues used by essay mill providers in the text of their websites. These reassurance cues help to ensure the attractiveness of the essay mill product to potential student consumers. The analysis then moves to explore the ethical discourses around academic integrity that essay mills provide, revealing inconsistencies in their stance towards the potential for academic misconduct from the use of essay mill services. Finally, the paper explores the quality of the essay mill product, through grading and Turnitin® reports for the two purchased essay mill assignments. Following recent calls for the outlawing of essay mills, this paper provides a timely addition to current understanding of this phenomenon, and the associated challenges of contract cheating in HE.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages26
JournalBritish Educational Research Journal
Early online date17 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

education
purchase
integrity
student
grading
social attraction
transaction
website
supply
university
discourse
interaction

Cite this

@article{d918e294261e4513a17ad6c471c19bbd,
title = "Contract cheating in UK higher education: A covert investigation of essay mills",
abstract = "Contract cheating is currently a concern for universities and the HE sector. It has been brought into the spotlight in recent years through the growth of online essay mills, where students can easily commission and purchase written assessment responses. This study contributes to the wider literature on academic integrity in HE by examining the phenomenon of contract cheating from a from a supply side perspective, thereby considering the essay mill offering and student interaction with it. The authors covertly engage with five essay mills, before successfully completing an assignment purchase with two of these providers. The pre-purchase stage of an assignment transaction is first examined, unpacking ten reassurance cues used by essay mill providers in the text of their websites. These reassurance cues help to ensure the attractiveness of the essay mill product to potential student consumers. The analysis then moves to explore the ethical discourses around academic integrity that essay mills provide, revealing inconsistencies in their stance towards the potential for academic misconduct from the use of essay mill services. Finally, the paper explores the quality of the essay mill product, through grading and Turnitin{\circledR} reports for the two purchased essay mill assignments. Following recent calls for the outlawing of essay mills, this paper provides a timely addition to current understanding of this phenomenon, and the associated challenges of contract cheating in HE.",
keywords = "contract cheating, covert research, academic integrity, essay mill",
author = "Dominic Medway and Stuart Roper and Leah Gillooly",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1002/berj.3335",
language = "English",
journal = "British Educational Research Journal",
issn = "0141-1926",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Contract cheating in UK higher education : A covert investigation of essay mills. / Medway, Dominic; Roper, Stuart; Gillooly, Leah.

In: British Educational Research Journal, 17.04.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contract cheating in UK higher education

T2 - British Educational Research Journal

AU - Medway, Dominic

AU - Roper, Stuart

AU - Gillooly, Leah

PY - 2018/4/17

Y1 - 2018/4/17

N2 - Contract cheating is currently a concern for universities and the HE sector. It has been brought into the spotlight in recent years through the growth of online essay mills, where students can easily commission and purchase written assessment responses. This study contributes to the wider literature on academic integrity in HE by examining the phenomenon of contract cheating from a from a supply side perspective, thereby considering the essay mill offering and student interaction with it. The authors covertly engage with five essay mills, before successfully completing an assignment purchase with two of these providers. The pre-purchase stage of an assignment transaction is first examined, unpacking ten reassurance cues used by essay mill providers in the text of their websites. These reassurance cues help to ensure the attractiveness of the essay mill product to potential student consumers. The analysis then moves to explore the ethical discourses around academic integrity that essay mills provide, revealing inconsistencies in their stance towards the potential for academic misconduct from the use of essay mill services. Finally, the paper explores the quality of the essay mill product, through grading and Turnitin® reports for the two purchased essay mill assignments. Following recent calls for the outlawing of essay mills, this paper provides a timely addition to current understanding of this phenomenon, and the associated challenges of contract cheating in HE.

AB - Contract cheating is currently a concern for universities and the HE sector. It has been brought into the spotlight in recent years through the growth of online essay mills, where students can easily commission and purchase written assessment responses. This study contributes to the wider literature on academic integrity in HE by examining the phenomenon of contract cheating from a from a supply side perspective, thereby considering the essay mill offering and student interaction with it. The authors covertly engage with five essay mills, before successfully completing an assignment purchase with two of these providers. The pre-purchase stage of an assignment transaction is first examined, unpacking ten reassurance cues used by essay mill providers in the text of their websites. These reassurance cues help to ensure the attractiveness of the essay mill product to potential student consumers. The analysis then moves to explore the ethical discourses around academic integrity that essay mills provide, revealing inconsistencies in their stance towards the potential for academic misconduct from the use of essay mill services. Finally, the paper explores the quality of the essay mill product, through grading and Turnitin® reports for the two purchased essay mill assignments. Following recent calls for the outlawing of essay mills, this paper provides a timely addition to current understanding of this phenomenon, and the associated challenges of contract cheating in HE.

KW - contract cheating

KW - covert research

KW - academic integrity

KW - essay mill

U2 - 10.1002/berj.3335

DO - 10.1002/berj.3335

M3 - Article

JO - British Educational Research Journal

JF - British Educational Research Journal

SN - 0141-1926

ER -