Contradictions in architecture design studios

Reflections on the concepts of design embedded in architectural education

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

In Architecture Schools, Design Studio modules are conceived as the core learning activity, in which students must generate and develop a design proposal. In this context, there is an implicit notion that lecturers and students share a common idea of what the Design Activity is. However, this may not be true as divergent, and sometimes, contradictory ideas of design seem to coexist within the framework of architectural courses. Moreover, such contradictions can lead to lack of coherence among learning activities modules, limiting modules integration and, consequently, hampering the development of key competences, as collaborative skills, by the students. Thus, this paper aims to discuss how different ideas of design coexist in an Architecture School, and how to resolve such contradictions promoting better integration among distinct modules. The findings are based on a literature review on the topics of Design theory, Architecture Education and Collaborative design, as well as on the researchers’ own experience in teaching. Examples of the adoption of Problem-based learning (PBL) in the Architectural Educational context have been explored to overcome gaps over the idea of design in the curriculum. In conclusion, it is suggested that Architecture Schools need to be able to engage in activities of collective reflection on the operational level. First, existing silos need to be questioned in relation to the overall structure of the course. Such reflection should reveal contradictions in the ideas of design among the modules’ leaders. Consequently, wrong assumptions embedded on the existing structures need to be broken down, and new structures and supportive initiatives should emerge with a sense of collaborative practices focused on the co-construction of knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 5th International conference on Architecture and Built Environment S.ARCH 2018
Place of PublicationVenice, Italy
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jul 2018
Event5th International Conference on Architecture and Built Environment - Venice, Italy
Duration: 22 May 201824 May 2018
Conference number: 5
http://s-arch.net/html/2018.html (Link to Conference Website )

Conference

Conference5th International Conference on Architecture and Built Environment
Abbreviated titleS.ARCH 2018
CountryItaly
CityVenice
Period22/05/1824/05/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

education
need structure
school
learning
student
university teacher
leader
curriculum
lack
Teaching
experience
coherence
literature

Cite this

Gomes, D., Tzortzopoulos, P., & Meddings, C. (2018). Contradictions in architecture design studios: Reflections on the concepts of design embedded in architectural education. In Proceedings of the 5th International conference on Architecture and Built Environment S.ARCH 2018 Venice, Italy.
Gomes, Danilo ; Tzortzopoulos, Patricia ; Meddings, Carl. / Contradictions in architecture design studios : Reflections on the concepts of design embedded in architectural education. Proceedings of the 5th International conference on Architecture and Built Environment S.ARCH 2018. Venice, Italy, 2018.
@inproceedings{29f81fbc79404d78a0e40809be5cd40e,
title = "Contradictions in architecture design studios: Reflections on the concepts of design embedded in architectural education",
abstract = "In Architecture Schools, Design Studio modules are conceived as the core learning activity, in which students must generate and develop a design proposal. In this context, there is an implicit notion that lecturers and students share a common idea of what the Design Activity is. However, this may not be true as divergent, and sometimes, contradictory ideas of design seem to coexist within the framework of architectural courses. Moreover, such contradictions can lead to lack of coherence among learning activities modules, limiting modules integration and, consequently, hampering the development of key competences, as collaborative skills, by the students. Thus, this paper aims to discuss how different ideas of design coexist in an Architecture School, and how to resolve such contradictions promoting better integration among distinct modules. The findings are based on a literature review on the topics of Design theory, Architecture Education and Collaborative design, as well as on the researchers’ own experience in teaching. Examples of the adoption of Problem-based learning (PBL) in the Architectural Educational context have been explored to overcome gaps over the idea of design in the curriculum. In conclusion, it is suggested that Architecture Schools need to be able to engage in activities of collective reflection on the operational level. First, existing silos need to be questioned in relation to the overall structure of the course. Such reflection should reveal contradictions in the ideas of design among the modules’ leaders. Consequently, wrong assumptions embedded on the existing structures need to be broken down, and new structures and supportive initiatives should emerge with a sense of collaborative practices focused on the co-construction of knowledge.",
keywords = "Design studios, Architecture school, Reflective conversation, Collaboration",
author = "Danilo Gomes and Patricia Tzortzopoulos and Carl Meddings",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "12",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783981827590",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 5th International conference on Architecture and Built Environment S.ARCH 2018",

}

Gomes, D, Tzortzopoulos, P & Meddings, C 2018, Contradictions in architecture design studios: Reflections on the concepts of design embedded in architectural education. in Proceedings of the 5th International conference on Architecture and Built Environment S.ARCH 2018. Venice, Italy, 5th International Conference on Architecture and Built Environment, Venice, Italy, 22/05/18.

Contradictions in architecture design studios : Reflections on the concepts of design embedded in architectural education. / Gomes, Danilo; Tzortzopoulos, Patricia; Meddings, Carl.

Proceedings of the 5th International conference on Architecture and Built Environment S.ARCH 2018. Venice, Italy, 2018.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Contradictions in architecture design studios

T2 - Reflections on the concepts of design embedded in architectural education

AU - Gomes, Danilo

AU - Tzortzopoulos, Patricia

AU - Meddings, Carl

PY - 2018/7/12

Y1 - 2018/7/12

N2 - In Architecture Schools, Design Studio modules are conceived as the core learning activity, in which students must generate and develop a design proposal. In this context, there is an implicit notion that lecturers and students share a common idea of what the Design Activity is. However, this may not be true as divergent, and sometimes, contradictory ideas of design seem to coexist within the framework of architectural courses. Moreover, such contradictions can lead to lack of coherence among learning activities modules, limiting modules integration and, consequently, hampering the development of key competences, as collaborative skills, by the students. Thus, this paper aims to discuss how different ideas of design coexist in an Architecture School, and how to resolve such contradictions promoting better integration among distinct modules. The findings are based on a literature review on the topics of Design theory, Architecture Education and Collaborative design, as well as on the researchers’ own experience in teaching. Examples of the adoption of Problem-based learning (PBL) in the Architectural Educational context have been explored to overcome gaps over the idea of design in the curriculum. In conclusion, it is suggested that Architecture Schools need to be able to engage in activities of collective reflection on the operational level. First, existing silos need to be questioned in relation to the overall structure of the course. Such reflection should reveal contradictions in the ideas of design among the modules’ leaders. Consequently, wrong assumptions embedded on the existing structures need to be broken down, and new structures and supportive initiatives should emerge with a sense of collaborative practices focused on the co-construction of knowledge.

AB - In Architecture Schools, Design Studio modules are conceived as the core learning activity, in which students must generate and develop a design proposal. In this context, there is an implicit notion that lecturers and students share a common idea of what the Design Activity is. However, this may not be true as divergent, and sometimes, contradictory ideas of design seem to coexist within the framework of architectural courses. Moreover, such contradictions can lead to lack of coherence among learning activities modules, limiting modules integration and, consequently, hampering the development of key competences, as collaborative skills, by the students. Thus, this paper aims to discuss how different ideas of design coexist in an Architecture School, and how to resolve such contradictions promoting better integration among distinct modules. The findings are based on a literature review on the topics of Design theory, Architecture Education and Collaborative design, as well as on the researchers’ own experience in teaching. Examples of the adoption of Problem-based learning (PBL) in the Architectural Educational context have been explored to overcome gaps over the idea of design in the curriculum. In conclusion, it is suggested that Architecture Schools need to be able to engage in activities of collective reflection on the operational level. First, existing silos need to be questioned in relation to the overall structure of the course. Such reflection should reveal contradictions in the ideas of design among the modules’ leaders. Consequently, wrong assumptions embedded on the existing structures need to be broken down, and new structures and supportive initiatives should emerge with a sense of collaborative practices focused on the co-construction of knowledge.

KW - Design studios

KW - Architecture school

KW - Reflective conversation

KW - Collaboration

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783981827590

BT - Proceedings of the 5th International conference on Architecture and Built Environment S.ARCH 2018

CY - Venice, Italy

ER -

Gomes D, Tzortzopoulos P, Meddings C. Contradictions in architecture design studios: Reflections on the concepts of design embedded in architectural education. In Proceedings of the 5th International conference on Architecture and Built Environment S.ARCH 2018. Venice, Italy. 2018