TY - JOUR
T1 - Could laser-based profile measurements be used in wheel/rail contact and vehicle dynamics simulations?
AU - Wang, Yi
AU - Crosbee, David
AU - Rothwell, Elliot
AU - Oldknow, Kevin David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© IMechE 2025.
PY - 2025/4/8
Y1 - 2025/4/8
N2 - Contact-based profilometers have been the de facto standard in obtaining wheel and rail profiles for the purposes of vehicle-track and wheel-rail interaction studies. Still, they cannot collect profiles in large quantities. This paper explores the potential of laser-based profilometers for wheel and rail profile measurements in vehicle-track dynamic simulations. Comparisons between contact and laser-based profilometers were performed using sample rail profiles measured in the lab. Through contact simulations, contact preprocessing and multi-body dynamics simulations (MBD), differences in contact pressures, forces, and Y/Q were analyzed. The importance of data processing and profile smoothing is also discussed. Axle sum Y/Q showed the smallest differences between the two sets of profiles, with more than 80% of the MBD simulations having less than 10% difference. While far from perfect, the ability of wayside and vehicle-mounted laser profilometers can enable analyses to be performed at a much larger scale. The authors hope this work will lead to an open-minded approach to continue evaluating laser-based profiles in simulations.
AB - Contact-based profilometers have been the de facto standard in obtaining wheel and rail profiles for the purposes of vehicle-track and wheel-rail interaction studies. Still, they cannot collect profiles in large quantities. This paper explores the potential of laser-based profilometers for wheel and rail profile measurements in vehicle-track dynamic simulations. Comparisons between contact and laser-based profilometers were performed using sample rail profiles measured in the lab. Through contact simulations, contact preprocessing and multi-body dynamics simulations (MBD), differences in contact pressures, forces, and Y/Q were analyzed. The importance of data processing and profile smoothing is also discussed. Axle sum Y/Q showed the smallest differences between the two sets of profiles, with more than 80% of the MBD simulations having less than 10% difference. While far from perfect, the ability of wayside and vehicle-mounted laser profilometers can enable analyses to be performed at a much larger scale. The authors hope this work will lead to an open-minded approach to continue evaluating laser-based profiles in simulations.
KW - railway safety
KW - railway technology
KW - simulations
KW - wheel/rail contact
KW - wheel/rail interaction
KW - wheel/rail profile measurement
KW - wheel/rail profile processing
KW - Wheel/rail profiles
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002641579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/09544097251332371
DO - 10.1177/09544097251332371
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002641579
JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
SN - 0954-4097
ER -