Creativity, anti-humanism and the ‘new sociology of art’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews sociology’s uneasy engagement with creativity, using the lens of recent critiques of Bourdieusian art sociology and the call for a more nuanced understanding of the agency of art objects and trajectories of artistic production. I develop and apply an anti-humanist ontology to assert that creativity is profoundly sociologically interesting, and key to the production of human culture, from science and technology to the arts to social forms and institutions. Analysis of auto-ethnographic data on the production of a painting of Australian mallée woodland establishes three propositions for an anti-humanist sociology of creativity: that creative production is part of an open-ended flow of affect between assembled human and non-human elements; that affective flows produce creative capacities to act, feel and desire in bodies; and that products of creativity such as artworks are themselves affects that themselves contribute to the production of social life, the world and human history.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)522-536
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Sociology
Volume51
Issue number3
Early online date28 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sociology of art
humanism
creativity
capacity to act
art
ontology
sociology
history
science

Cite this

@article{6aea8675b02e438b8af1b50f535d8c0d,
title = "Creativity, anti-humanism and the ‘new sociology of art’",
abstract = "This article reviews sociology’s uneasy engagement with creativity, using the lens of recent critiques of Bourdieusian art sociology and the call for a more nuanced understanding of the agency of art objects and trajectories of artistic production. I develop and apply an anti-humanist ontology to assert that creativity is profoundly sociologically interesting, and key to the production of human culture, from science and technology to the arts to social forms and institutions. Analysis of auto-ethnographic data on the production of a painting of Australian mall{\'e}e woodland establishes three propositions for an anti-humanist sociology of creativity: that creative production is part of an open-ended flow of affect between assembled human and non-human elements; that affective flows produce creative capacities to act, feel and desire in bodies; and that products of creativity such as artworks are themselves affects that themselves contribute to the production of social life, the world and human history.",
keywords = "art, postmodernism, sociological theory, sociology of art",
author = "Nick Fox",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1440783313498947",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "522--536",
journal = "Journal of Sociology",
issn = "1440-7833",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Creativity, anti-humanism and the ‘new sociology of art’. / Fox, Nick.

In: Journal of Sociology, Vol. 51, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 522-536.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creativity, anti-humanism and the ‘new sociology of art’

AU - Fox, Nick

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - This article reviews sociology’s uneasy engagement with creativity, using the lens of recent critiques of Bourdieusian art sociology and the call for a more nuanced understanding of the agency of art objects and trajectories of artistic production. I develop and apply an anti-humanist ontology to assert that creativity is profoundly sociologically interesting, and key to the production of human culture, from science and technology to the arts to social forms and institutions. Analysis of auto-ethnographic data on the production of a painting of Australian mallée woodland establishes three propositions for an anti-humanist sociology of creativity: that creative production is part of an open-ended flow of affect between assembled human and non-human elements; that affective flows produce creative capacities to act, feel and desire in bodies; and that products of creativity such as artworks are themselves affects that themselves contribute to the production of social life, the world and human history.

AB - This article reviews sociology’s uneasy engagement with creativity, using the lens of recent critiques of Bourdieusian art sociology and the call for a more nuanced understanding of the agency of art objects and trajectories of artistic production. I develop and apply an anti-humanist ontology to assert that creativity is profoundly sociologically interesting, and key to the production of human culture, from science and technology to the arts to social forms and institutions. Analysis of auto-ethnographic data on the production of a painting of Australian mallée woodland establishes three propositions for an anti-humanist sociology of creativity: that creative production is part of an open-ended flow of affect between assembled human and non-human elements; that affective flows produce creative capacities to act, feel and desire in bodies; and that products of creativity such as artworks are themselves affects that themselves contribute to the production of social life, the world and human history.

KW - art

KW - postmodernism

KW - sociological theory

KW - sociology of art

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940211944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1440783313498947

DO - 10.1177/1440783313498947

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 522

EP - 536

JO - Journal of Sociology

JF - Journal of Sociology

SN - 1440-7833

IS - 3

ER -