Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in the United Arab Emirates: A Suitable Case for Reorientation?

Paul Ekblom, Rachel Armitage, Leanne Monchuk, Ben Castell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the field of CPTED, theorists and practitioners alike readily acknowledge the need to design buildings and layouts that closely fit the local context and wider design requirements, including aesthetics, social conditions, and development and construction constraints. Crime prevention functions cannot simply be imposed or bolted on while ignoring local circumstances and other priorities such as energy conservation. But gett ing crime prevention designs to work successfully can be tricky because they rarely act directly (as with putt ing high walls around a building), but exert their preventive effect by motivating and directing the actions of people such as residents, managers and passers-by, and deterring offenders. Crime prevention designs for the built environment can thus rarely be massproduced but must be customized to local conditions. CPTED evolved in Western countries, with commonalities of culture and built environment, despite variations, for example, in climate between Northern Europe and Australia. Transferring CPTED to other regions such as the United Arab Emirates therefore poses even more of a challenge, where there are marked differences not just in terms of climate but also in culture pertaining, for example to privacy, ownership of property, development control and tradition. Recent experience in researching international good practice and standards for application in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, is used to illustrate these contextual differences, to draw broader lessons for CPTED, and to discuss the challenges to cross-cultural knowledge transfer in crime prevention.

LanguageEnglish
Pages92-113
Number of pages22
JournalBuilt Environment
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

environmental design
crime prevention
United Arab Emirates
crime
climate
development control
Northern Europe
Persian Gulf
architectural design
knowledge transfer
social development
energy conservation
esthetics
layout
social factors
ownership
best practice
privacy
offender
building

Cite this

@article{af037e3aa54047318fe674dd1b58fdcc,
title = "Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in the United Arab Emirates: A Suitable Case for Reorientation?",
abstract = "In the field of CPTED, theorists and practitioners alike readily acknowledge the need to design buildings and layouts that closely fit the local context and wider design requirements, including aesthetics, social conditions, and development and construction constraints. Crime prevention functions cannot simply be imposed or bolted on while ignoring local circumstances and other priorities such as energy conservation. But gett ing crime prevention designs to work successfully can be tricky because they rarely act directly (as with putt ing high walls around a building), but exert their preventive effect by motivating and directing the actions of people such as residents, managers and passers-by, and deterring offenders. Crime prevention designs for the built environment can thus rarely be massproduced but must be customized to local conditions. CPTED evolved in Western countries, with commonalities of culture and built environment, despite variations, for example, in climate between Northern Europe and Australia. Transferring CPTED to other regions such as the United Arab Emirates therefore poses even more of a challenge, where there are marked differences not just in terms of climate but also in culture pertaining, for example to privacy, ownership of property, development control and tradition. Recent experience in researching international good practice and standards for application in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, is used to illustrate these contextual differences, to draw broader lessons for CPTED, and to discuss the challenges to cross-cultural knowledge transfer in crime prevention.",
author = "Paul Ekblom and Rachel Armitage and Leanne Monchuk and Ben Castell",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2148/benv.39.1.92",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "92--113",
journal = "Built Environment",
issn = "0263-7960",
publisher = "Alexandrine Press",
number = "1",

}

Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in the United Arab Emirates : A Suitable Case for Reorientation? / Ekblom, Paul; Armitage, Rachel; Monchuk, Leanne; Castell, Ben.

In: Built Environment, Vol. 39, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 92-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in the United Arab Emirates

T2 - Built Environment

AU - Ekblom, Paul

AU - Armitage, Rachel

AU - Monchuk, Leanne

AU - Castell, Ben

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - In the field of CPTED, theorists and practitioners alike readily acknowledge the need to design buildings and layouts that closely fit the local context and wider design requirements, including aesthetics, social conditions, and development and construction constraints. Crime prevention functions cannot simply be imposed or bolted on while ignoring local circumstances and other priorities such as energy conservation. But gett ing crime prevention designs to work successfully can be tricky because they rarely act directly (as with putt ing high walls around a building), but exert their preventive effect by motivating and directing the actions of people such as residents, managers and passers-by, and deterring offenders. Crime prevention designs for the built environment can thus rarely be massproduced but must be customized to local conditions. CPTED evolved in Western countries, with commonalities of culture and built environment, despite variations, for example, in climate between Northern Europe and Australia. Transferring CPTED to other regions such as the United Arab Emirates therefore poses even more of a challenge, where there are marked differences not just in terms of climate but also in culture pertaining, for example to privacy, ownership of property, development control and tradition. Recent experience in researching international good practice and standards for application in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, is used to illustrate these contextual differences, to draw broader lessons for CPTED, and to discuss the challenges to cross-cultural knowledge transfer in crime prevention.

AB - In the field of CPTED, theorists and practitioners alike readily acknowledge the need to design buildings and layouts that closely fit the local context and wider design requirements, including aesthetics, social conditions, and development and construction constraints. Crime prevention functions cannot simply be imposed or bolted on while ignoring local circumstances and other priorities such as energy conservation. But gett ing crime prevention designs to work successfully can be tricky because they rarely act directly (as with putt ing high walls around a building), but exert their preventive effect by motivating and directing the actions of people such as residents, managers and passers-by, and deterring offenders. Crime prevention designs for the built environment can thus rarely be massproduced but must be customized to local conditions. CPTED evolved in Western countries, with commonalities of culture and built environment, despite variations, for example, in climate between Northern Europe and Australia. Transferring CPTED to other regions such as the United Arab Emirates therefore poses even more of a challenge, where there are marked differences not just in terms of climate but also in culture pertaining, for example to privacy, ownership of property, development control and tradition. Recent experience in researching international good practice and standards for application in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, is used to illustrate these contextual differences, to draw broader lessons for CPTED, and to discuss the challenges to cross-cultural knowledge transfer in crime prevention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877020590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/alex/benv/2013/00000039/00000001;jsessionid=g9wwc77qq8tt.x-ic-live-03

U2 - 10.2148/benv.39.1.92

DO - 10.2148/benv.39.1.92

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 92

EP - 113

JO - Built Environment

JF - Built Environment

SN - 0263-7960

IS - 1

ER -