Crisis at Guy's Hospital (1880) and the nature of nursing work

Sheri Tesseyman, Christine Hallett, Jane Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This historical study aims to refine understanding of the nature of nursing work. The study focuses on the 1880 crisis at Guy's Hospital in London to examine the nature and meaning of nursing work, particularly the concept of nursing work as many ‘little things.’ In this paper, an examination of Margaret Lonsdale's writing offers an original contribution to our understanding of the ways in which nursing work differs from medical practice. In this way, we use the late-nineteenth-century controversy at Guy's Hospital as a prism through which to examine the contested nature of nursing work. Lonsdale's ideas are corroborated by examination of writings by nurse leaders Florence Nightingale and Eva Luckes. Luckes, in particular, elaborated what was meant by nursing as the performance of a thousand little things, which are specific to nursing work. While physicians had been performing much of what was considered to be nursing work, nurses developed some of these and other interventions into a unique body of work characterized by meticulous attention to significant details. Some implications regarding current nursing practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12203
Number of pages8
JournalNursing Inquiry
Volume24
Issue number4
Early online date23 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing
Nurses
Physicians

Cite this

@article{637f8c3e865c403390374f1ae98aba46,
title = "Crisis at Guy's Hospital (1880) and the nature of nursing work",
abstract = "This historical study aims to refine understanding of the nature of nursing work. The study focuses on the 1880 crisis at Guy's Hospital in London to examine the nature and meaning of nursing work, particularly the concept of nursing work as many ‘little things.’ In this paper, an examination of Margaret Lonsdale's writing offers an original contribution to our understanding of the ways in which nursing work differs from medical practice. In this way, we use the late-nineteenth-century controversy at Guy's Hospital as a prism through which to examine the contested nature of nursing work. Lonsdale's ideas are corroborated by examination of writings by nurse leaders Florence Nightingale and Eva Luckes. Luckes, in particular, elaborated what was meant by nursing as the performance of a thousand little things, which are specific to nursing work. While physicians had been performing much of what was considered to be nursing work, nurses developed some of these and other interventions into a unique body of work characterized by meticulous attention to significant details. Some implications regarding current nursing practice are discussed.",
keywords = "history, little things, medicine, nurses, nursing, ontology, physicians, work",
author = "Sheri Tesseyman and Christine Hallett and Jane Brooks",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/nin.12203",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "Nursing Inquiry",
issn = "1320-7881",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Crisis at Guy's Hospital (1880) and the nature of nursing work. / Tesseyman, Sheri; Hallett, Christine; Brooks, Jane.

In: Nursing Inquiry, Vol. 24, No. 4, e12203, 01.10.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crisis at Guy's Hospital (1880) and the nature of nursing work

AU - Tesseyman, Sheri

AU - Hallett, Christine

AU - Brooks, Jane

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - This historical study aims to refine understanding of the nature of nursing work. The study focuses on the 1880 crisis at Guy's Hospital in London to examine the nature and meaning of nursing work, particularly the concept of nursing work as many ‘little things.’ In this paper, an examination of Margaret Lonsdale's writing offers an original contribution to our understanding of the ways in which nursing work differs from medical practice. In this way, we use the late-nineteenth-century controversy at Guy's Hospital as a prism through which to examine the contested nature of nursing work. Lonsdale's ideas are corroborated by examination of writings by nurse leaders Florence Nightingale and Eva Luckes. Luckes, in particular, elaborated what was meant by nursing as the performance of a thousand little things, which are specific to nursing work. While physicians had been performing much of what was considered to be nursing work, nurses developed some of these and other interventions into a unique body of work characterized by meticulous attention to significant details. Some implications regarding current nursing practice are discussed.

AB - This historical study aims to refine understanding of the nature of nursing work. The study focuses on the 1880 crisis at Guy's Hospital in London to examine the nature and meaning of nursing work, particularly the concept of nursing work as many ‘little things.’ In this paper, an examination of Margaret Lonsdale's writing offers an original contribution to our understanding of the ways in which nursing work differs from medical practice. In this way, we use the late-nineteenth-century controversy at Guy's Hospital as a prism through which to examine the contested nature of nursing work. Lonsdale's ideas are corroborated by examination of writings by nurse leaders Florence Nightingale and Eva Luckes. Luckes, in particular, elaborated what was meant by nursing as the performance of a thousand little things, which are specific to nursing work. While physicians had been performing much of what was considered to be nursing work, nurses developed some of these and other interventions into a unique body of work characterized by meticulous attention to significant details. Some implications regarding current nursing practice are discussed.

KW - history

KW - little things

KW - medicine

KW - nurses

KW - nursing

KW - ontology

KW - physicians

KW - work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030982284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/nin.12203

DO - 10.1111/nin.12203

M3 - Article

VL - 24

JO - Nursing Inquiry

JF - Nursing Inquiry

SN - 1320-7881

IS - 4

M1 - e12203

ER -