Criteria for assessing the appropriateness of patient counseling in community pharmacies

Paul R Ward, Paul Bissell, Peter R Noyce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

O B J E C T I V E: To develop valid, reliable criteria for assessing the appropriateness of the management of common ailments and
nonprescription drug therapy in community pharmacies in the UK.
M E T H O D S: The criteria were developed by an expert panel using the nominal group technique. The validity of the criteria was tested
by surveying a random sample of pharmacists who were asked to rate the importance of each criterion on a semantic differential
scale from 1 (low) to 7 (high). Subsequently, the reliability of the criteria was assessed: a random sample of pharmacists were each
asked to apply the criteria to four vignettes of patient counseling on two separate occasions.
R E S U L T S: All assessment criteria exceeded our predefined level of face, content, and consensual validity. In reliability testing, the
overall assessment of appropriateness, along with five component assessment criteria, surpassed our predefined level of reliability.
Three criteria, however, did not meet our predefined standard. These criteria were rational content of advice, rational product choice,
and referral to another health professional.
C O N C L U S I O N S: This represents the first systematic attempt to develop an instrument of general applicability for assessing the
appropriateness of patient counseling and to subject it to rigorous validity and reliability testing. We suggest that further work is
required to refine the criteria that did not meet reliability standards and to understand the decision-making processes underlying the
assessment of vignettes of patient counseling
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-175
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Pharmacotherapy
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pharmacies
Counseling
Pharmacists
Semantics
Reproducibility of Results
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
Drug Therapy
Health

Cite this

@article{649bb5630a0c4722b7b3fdf5714ebfa5,
title = "Criteria for assessing the appropriateness of patient counseling in community pharmacies",
abstract = "O B J E C T I V E: To develop valid, reliable criteria for assessing the appropriateness of the management of common ailments andnonprescription drug therapy in community pharmacies in the UK.M E T H O D S: The criteria were developed by an expert panel using the nominal group technique. The validity of the criteria was testedby surveying a random sample of pharmacists who were asked to rate the importance of each criterion on a semantic differentialscale from 1 (low) to 7 (high). Subsequently, the reliability of the criteria was assessed: a random sample of pharmacists were eachasked to apply the criteria to four vignettes of patient counseling on two separate occasions.R E S U L T S: All assessment criteria exceeded our predefined level of face, content, and consensual validity. In reliability testing, theoverall assessment of appropriateness, along with five component assessment criteria, surpassed our predefined level of reliability.Three criteria, however, did not meet our predefined standard. These criteria were rational content of advice, rational product choice,and referral to another health professional.C O N C L U S I O N S: This represents the first systematic attempt to develop an instrument of general applicability for assessing theappropriateness of patient counseling and to subject it to rigorous validity and reliability testing. We suggest that further work isrequired to refine the criteria that did not meet reliability standards and to understand the decision-making processes underlying theassessment of vignettes of patient counseling",
author = "Ward, {Paul R} and Paul Bissell and Noyce, {Peter R}",
year = "2000",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1345/aph.19135",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "170--175",
journal = "Annals of Pharmacotherapy",
issn = "1060-0280",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

Criteria for assessing the appropriateness of patient counseling in community pharmacies. / Ward, Paul R; Bissell, Paul; Noyce, Peter R.

In: Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Vol. 34, No. 2, 02.2000, p. 170-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria for assessing the appropriateness of patient counseling in community pharmacies

AU - Ward, Paul R

AU - Bissell, Paul

AU - Noyce, Peter R

PY - 2000/2

Y1 - 2000/2

N2 - O B J E C T I V E: To develop valid, reliable criteria for assessing the appropriateness of the management of common ailments andnonprescription drug therapy in community pharmacies in the UK.M E T H O D S: The criteria were developed by an expert panel using the nominal group technique. The validity of the criteria was testedby surveying a random sample of pharmacists who were asked to rate the importance of each criterion on a semantic differentialscale from 1 (low) to 7 (high). Subsequently, the reliability of the criteria was assessed: a random sample of pharmacists were eachasked to apply the criteria to four vignettes of patient counseling on two separate occasions.R E S U L T S: All assessment criteria exceeded our predefined level of face, content, and consensual validity. In reliability testing, theoverall assessment of appropriateness, along with five component assessment criteria, surpassed our predefined level of reliability.Three criteria, however, did not meet our predefined standard. These criteria were rational content of advice, rational product choice,and referral to another health professional.C O N C L U S I O N S: This represents the first systematic attempt to develop an instrument of general applicability for assessing theappropriateness of patient counseling and to subject it to rigorous validity and reliability testing. We suggest that further work isrequired to refine the criteria that did not meet reliability standards and to understand the decision-making processes underlying theassessment of vignettes of patient counseling

AB - O B J E C T I V E: To develop valid, reliable criteria for assessing the appropriateness of the management of common ailments andnonprescription drug therapy in community pharmacies in the UK.M E T H O D S: The criteria were developed by an expert panel using the nominal group technique. The validity of the criteria was testedby surveying a random sample of pharmacists who were asked to rate the importance of each criterion on a semantic differentialscale from 1 (low) to 7 (high). Subsequently, the reliability of the criteria was assessed: a random sample of pharmacists were eachasked to apply the criteria to four vignettes of patient counseling on two separate occasions.R E S U L T S: All assessment criteria exceeded our predefined level of face, content, and consensual validity. In reliability testing, theoverall assessment of appropriateness, along with five component assessment criteria, surpassed our predefined level of reliability.Three criteria, however, did not meet our predefined standard. These criteria were rational content of advice, rational product choice,and referral to another health professional.C O N C L U S I O N S: This represents the first systematic attempt to develop an instrument of general applicability for assessing theappropriateness of patient counseling and to subject it to rigorous validity and reliability testing. We suggest that further work isrequired to refine the criteria that did not meet reliability standards and to understand the decision-making processes underlying theassessment of vignettes of patient counseling

U2 - 10.1345/aph.19135

DO - 10.1345/aph.19135

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 170

EP - 175

JO - Annals of Pharmacotherapy

JF - Annals of Pharmacotherapy

SN - 1060-0280

IS - 2

ER -