Criteria for evaluating research: The unique adequacy requirement of methods

John Alfred Rooke, Mike Kagioglou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)


The Unique Adequacy requirement of methods (UA) is proposed as a means of evaluating research in construction management. UA addresses the problems stemming from the significance of conscious action in constituting human organization. These may be summarized as: first, that objectivity is a problematic concept in such studies; second, that the determination of meaning is their primary goal; and third, that formal procedures, whether as methods of research or explanation, have significant limitations. The UA requirement has two forms: the weak form demands that the researcher is competent in the research setting; the strong form, that research reports use only concepts originating within the research setting. The consequences of applying these criteria are explored with reference to recent research reports in construction management, including: a questionnaire survey of cultural difference; an exercise in grounded theorizing; a case study of the implementation of a quality management initiative. It is concluded that the UA requirement is a viable tool for evaluating and guiding research. Emphasis is placed on the importance of maintaining a principled distinction between empirical research and theory building.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)979-987
Number of pages9
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Issue number9
Early online date18 Sep 2007
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2007
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Criteria for evaluating research: The unique adequacy requirement of methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this