Critical care nurses' perceptions about their involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care

Kim Hong Berner, Glenice Ives, Felicity Astin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to explore and describe the perceptions of critical care nurses' (CCNs) actual and preferred levels of involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care in critical care areas. A convenience sample of CCNs was recruited from two centres (one public and one private) and a researcher generated survey distributed to participants. Of the 131 questionnaires distributed, 90 were completed, giving a response rate of 68.7%. Results showed that, although most CCNs believed that they had important information to contribute to decisions relating to patient care, less than half felt that they were actively involved in such decisions. They were aware of the legal limits to their scope of practice but, despite this, most admitted that they made decisions beyond these limits. Approximately three quarters of the respondents thought CCNs should not be making decisions beyond legal boundaries. On the whole, CCNs wanted to be more involved formally and to have more power in decisions regarding patient care. One way forward is for the CCNs to have an advanced practice role.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-131
Number of pages9
JournalAustralian Critical Care
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Patient Care
Nurses
Decision Making
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{23486bf6c2c64b45816ea22969b2c573,
title = "Critical care nurses' perceptions about their involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care",
abstract = "The purpose of the study was to explore and describe the perceptions of critical care nurses' (CCNs) actual and preferred levels of involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care in critical care areas. A convenience sample of CCNs was recruited from two centres (one public and one private) and a researcher generated survey distributed to participants. Of the 131 questionnaires distributed, 90 were completed, giving a response rate of 68.7{\%}. Results showed that, although most CCNs believed that they had important information to contribute to decisions relating to patient care, less than half felt that they were actively involved in such decisions. They were aware of the legal limits to their scope of practice but, despite this, most admitted that they made decisions beyond these limits. Approximately three quarters of the respondents thought CCNs should not be making decisions beyond legal boundaries. On the whole, CCNs wanted to be more involved formally and to have more power in decisions regarding patient care. One way forward is for the CCNs to have an advanced practice role.",
keywords = "Nursing, Mental Health, Austrailia",
author = "Berner, {Kim Hong} and Glenice Ives and Felicity Astin",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1036-7314(04)80014-6",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "123--131",
journal = "Australian Critical Care",
issn = "1036-7314",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Critical care nurses' perceptions about their involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care. / Berner, Kim Hong; Ives, Glenice; Astin, Felicity.

In: Australian Critical Care, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.08.2004, p. 123-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical care nurses' perceptions about their involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care

AU - Berner, Kim Hong

AU - Ives, Glenice

AU - Astin, Felicity

PY - 2004/8/1

Y1 - 2004/8/1

N2 - The purpose of the study was to explore and describe the perceptions of critical care nurses' (CCNs) actual and preferred levels of involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care in critical care areas. A convenience sample of CCNs was recruited from two centres (one public and one private) and a researcher generated survey distributed to participants. Of the 131 questionnaires distributed, 90 were completed, giving a response rate of 68.7%. Results showed that, although most CCNs believed that they had important information to contribute to decisions relating to patient care, less than half felt that they were actively involved in such decisions. They were aware of the legal limits to their scope of practice but, despite this, most admitted that they made decisions beyond these limits. Approximately three quarters of the respondents thought CCNs should not be making decisions beyond legal boundaries. On the whole, CCNs wanted to be more involved formally and to have more power in decisions regarding patient care. One way forward is for the CCNs to have an advanced practice role.

AB - The purpose of the study was to explore and describe the perceptions of critical care nurses' (CCNs) actual and preferred levels of involvement in significant decisions regarding patient care in critical care areas. A convenience sample of CCNs was recruited from two centres (one public and one private) and a researcher generated survey distributed to participants. Of the 131 questionnaires distributed, 90 were completed, giving a response rate of 68.7%. Results showed that, although most CCNs believed that they had important information to contribute to decisions relating to patient care, less than half felt that they were actively involved in such decisions. They were aware of the legal limits to their scope of practice but, despite this, most admitted that they made decisions beyond these limits. Approximately three quarters of the respondents thought CCNs should not be making decisions beyond legal boundaries. On the whole, CCNs wanted to be more involved formally and to have more power in decisions regarding patient care. One way forward is for the CCNs to have an advanced practice role.

KW - Nursing

KW - Mental Health

KW - Austrailia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16544362219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1036-7314(04)80014-6

DO - 10.1016/S1036-7314(04)80014-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 15493860

AN - SCOPUS:16544362219

VL - 17

SP - 123

EP - 131

JO - Australian Critical Care

JF - Australian Critical Care

SN - 1036-7314

IS - 3

ER -