Cumulative jeopardy? A response to Brown and Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)


In recent years, the political context of children's social care in England has shifted from doubts about the efficacy of out-of-home care to the view that more children should be separated from their birth parents, earlier and more speedily. Brown and Ward's (2014) article 'Cumulative jeopardy' reflects this transition, making the case that there is a 'gross mismatch between timeframes for early childhood development and professional responses to evidence of abuse and neglect in the early years' (p. 6). This analysis of the research on which their argument is based, 'Infants suffering, or likely to suffer, significant harm', raises questions about whether the evidence presented adequately supports the conclusions drawn. Four aspects of the study are addressed: methodological, empirical, conceptual and ethical. It is argued that it is premature to reach a judgement about the balance of evidence for more widespread and early separation of infants from birth parents on the basis of the study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-73
Number of pages6
JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
Early online date11 Mar 2015
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Cumulative jeopardy? A response to Brown and Ward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this