Data, data everywhere - but not all the numbers that count? Mapping alternative provisions for students excluded from school

Pat Thomson, Lisa Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is now mandatory for English schools to ensure that young people, under 16 years of age, who are excluded from school are placed in an education and training programme within 12 days. The programme must be at least half time, and should offer a meaningful and balanced curriculum. The Every Child Matters agenda also suggests that schools must coordinate services with other agencies to ensure that young people deemed 'at risk' are assisted to stay in mainstream schooling. Our research project examined the educational and training provisions for permanently excluded pupils, and young people likely to be permanently excluded, across two Midlands counties. The research focus - who gets what - is fundamental to questions of equity, access and participation. The findings suggest that, despite some very good local practices and highly skilled practitioners, there is a lack of coordinated data about which programmes exist and who attends, and a proliferation of programmes with varying funding sources, costs, entry practices, and qualifications. It is argued that this situation bodes poorly for monitoring and for ensuring the entitlement to education and training of those young people who are most marginalised by and through their schooling. However, we are concerned about the possibilities for further intensification of staff work and increased surveillance on young people if our recommendations for equity monitoring and better quality control were to go ahead.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-438
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Inclusive Education
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

school
student
equity
monitoring
quality control
research focus
proliferation
qualification
surveillance
training program
pupil
education
research project
funding
staff
curriculum
participation
lack
Education
costs

Cite this

@article{a68945fc0cdf40949f46a7754dba9a15,
title = "Data, data everywhere - but not all the numbers that count? Mapping alternative provisions for students excluded from school",
abstract = "It is now mandatory for English schools to ensure that young people, under 16 years of age, who are excluded from school are placed in an education and training programme within 12 days. The programme must be at least half time, and should offer a meaningful and balanced curriculum. The Every Child Matters agenda also suggests that schools must coordinate services with other agencies to ensure that young people deemed 'at risk' are assisted to stay in mainstream schooling. Our research project examined the educational and training provisions for permanently excluded pupils, and young people likely to be permanently excluded, across two Midlands counties. The research focus - who gets what - is fundamental to questions of equity, access and participation. The findings suggest that, despite some very good local practices and highly skilled practitioners, there is a lack of coordinated data about which programmes exist and who attends, and a proliferation of programmes with varying funding sources, costs, entry practices, and qualifications. It is argued that this situation bodes poorly for monitoring and for ensuring the entitlement to education and training of those young people who are most marginalised by and through their schooling. However, we are concerned about the possibilities for further intensification of staff work and increased surveillance on young people if our recommendations for equity monitoring and better quality control were to go ahead.",
keywords = "Data, Equity, Exclusion",
author = "Pat Thomson and Lisa Russell",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/13603110801983264",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "423--438",
journal = "International Journal of Inclusive Education",
issn = "1360-3116",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data, data everywhere - but not all the numbers that count? Mapping alternative provisions for students excluded from school

AU - Thomson, Pat

AU - Russell, Lisa

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - It is now mandatory for English schools to ensure that young people, under 16 years of age, who are excluded from school are placed in an education and training programme within 12 days. The programme must be at least half time, and should offer a meaningful and balanced curriculum. The Every Child Matters agenda also suggests that schools must coordinate services with other agencies to ensure that young people deemed 'at risk' are assisted to stay in mainstream schooling. Our research project examined the educational and training provisions for permanently excluded pupils, and young people likely to be permanently excluded, across two Midlands counties. The research focus - who gets what - is fundamental to questions of equity, access and participation. The findings suggest that, despite some very good local practices and highly skilled practitioners, there is a lack of coordinated data about which programmes exist and who attends, and a proliferation of programmes with varying funding sources, costs, entry practices, and qualifications. It is argued that this situation bodes poorly for monitoring and for ensuring the entitlement to education and training of those young people who are most marginalised by and through their schooling. However, we are concerned about the possibilities for further intensification of staff work and increased surveillance on young people if our recommendations for equity monitoring and better quality control were to go ahead.

AB - It is now mandatory for English schools to ensure that young people, under 16 years of age, who are excluded from school are placed in an education and training programme within 12 days. The programme must be at least half time, and should offer a meaningful and balanced curriculum. The Every Child Matters agenda also suggests that schools must coordinate services with other agencies to ensure that young people deemed 'at risk' are assisted to stay in mainstream schooling. Our research project examined the educational and training provisions for permanently excluded pupils, and young people likely to be permanently excluded, across two Midlands counties. The research focus - who gets what - is fundamental to questions of equity, access and participation. The findings suggest that, despite some very good local practices and highly skilled practitioners, there is a lack of coordinated data about which programmes exist and who attends, and a proliferation of programmes with varying funding sources, costs, entry practices, and qualifications. It is argued that this situation bodes poorly for monitoring and for ensuring the entitlement to education and training of those young people who are most marginalised by and through their schooling. However, we are concerned about the possibilities for further intensification of staff work and increased surveillance on young people if our recommendations for equity monitoring and better quality control were to go ahead.

KW - Data

KW - Equity

KW - Exclusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949435551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tied20/current

U2 - 10.1080/13603110801983264

DO - 10.1080/13603110801983264

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 423

EP - 438

JO - International Journal of Inclusive Education

JF - International Journal of Inclusive Education

SN - 1360-3116

IS - 4

ER -