Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

246 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the possibility of measuring efficiency in the context of higher education. The paper begins by exploring the advantages and drawbacks of the various methods for measuring efficiency in the higher education context. The ease with which data envelopment analysis (DEA) can handle multiple inputs and multiple outputs makes it an attractive choice of technique for measuring the efficiency of higher education institutions (HEIs), yet its drawbacks cannot be ignored. Thus, a number of extensions to the methodology, designed to overcome some of the disadvantages, are presented. The paper ends with an application of DEA to a data set of more than 100 HEIs in England using data for the year 2000/01. Technical and scale efficiency in the English higher education sector appear to be high on average. The Pastor, Ruiz, and Sirvent [2002. Operations Research, 50(4), 728-735] test for comparing nested DEA models is useful in reducing the full model to a smaller 'significant' set of inputs and outputs. Thus, the quantity and quality of undergraduates, the quantity of postgraduates, expenditure on administration, and the value of interest payments and depreciation are significant inputs to, and the quantity and quality of undergraduate degrees, the quantity of postgraduate degrees and research are significant outputs in the English higher education production process. The possibility of differences in the production frontier (and hence the distribution of efficiencies) of three distinct groups of HEIs is explored using a test proposed by Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes [1981. Management Science, 27(6), 668-697] but no significant differences are found. Bootstrapping procedures, however, suggest that differences between the most and least efficient English HEIs are significant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-288
Number of pages16
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume25
Issue number3
Early online date12 Sep 2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

data analysis
efficiency
education
operations research
Higher education institutions
Data envelopment analysis
production process
expenditures
Undergraduate
methodology
science
management
Values
Group

Cite this

@article{886f0c7bb29749a5bd0ca85addf3f3a8,
title = "Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to examine the possibility of measuring efficiency in the context of higher education. The paper begins by exploring the advantages and drawbacks of the various methods for measuring efficiency in the higher education context. The ease with which data envelopment analysis (DEA) can handle multiple inputs and multiple outputs makes it an attractive choice of technique for measuring the efficiency of higher education institutions (HEIs), yet its drawbacks cannot be ignored. Thus, a number of extensions to the methodology, designed to overcome some of the disadvantages, are presented. The paper ends with an application of DEA to a data set of more than 100 HEIs in England using data for the year 2000/01. Technical and scale efficiency in the English higher education sector appear to be high on average. The Pastor, Ruiz, and Sirvent [2002. Operations Research, 50(4), 728-735] test for comparing nested DEA models is useful in reducing the full model to a smaller 'significant' set of inputs and outputs. Thus, the quantity and quality of undergraduates, the quantity of postgraduates, expenditure on administration, and the value of interest payments and depreciation are significant inputs to, and the quantity and quality of undergraduate degrees, the quantity of postgraduate degrees and research are significant outputs in the English higher education production process. The possibility of differences in the production frontier (and hence the distribution of efficiencies) of three distinct groups of HEIs is explored using a test proposed by Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes [1981. Management Science, 27(6), 668-697] but no significant differences are found. Bootstrapping procedures, however, suggest that differences between the most and least efficient English HEIs are significant.",
keywords = "Data envelopment analysis, Efficiency measurement, Higher education",
author = "Jill Johnes",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.005",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "273--288",
journal = "Economics of Education Review",
issn = "0272-7757",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. / Johnes, Jill.

In: Economics of Education Review, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.06.2006, p. 273-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education

AU - Johnes, Jill

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to examine the possibility of measuring efficiency in the context of higher education. The paper begins by exploring the advantages and drawbacks of the various methods for measuring efficiency in the higher education context. The ease with which data envelopment analysis (DEA) can handle multiple inputs and multiple outputs makes it an attractive choice of technique for measuring the efficiency of higher education institutions (HEIs), yet its drawbacks cannot be ignored. Thus, a number of extensions to the methodology, designed to overcome some of the disadvantages, are presented. The paper ends with an application of DEA to a data set of more than 100 HEIs in England using data for the year 2000/01. Technical and scale efficiency in the English higher education sector appear to be high on average. The Pastor, Ruiz, and Sirvent [2002. Operations Research, 50(4), 728-735] test for comparing nested DEA models is useful in reducing the full model to a smaller 'significant' set of inputs and outputs. Thus, the quantity and quality of undergraduates, the quantity of postgraduates, expenditure on administration, and the value of interest payments and depreciation are significant inputs to, and the quantity and quality of undergraduate degrees, the quantity of postgraduate degrees and research are significant outputs in the English higher education production process. The possibility of differences in the production frontier (and hence the distribution of efficiencies) of three distinct groups of HEIs is explored using a test proposed by Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes [1981. Management Science, 27(6), 668-697] but no significant differences are found. Bootstrapping procedures, however, suggest that differences between the most and least efficient English HEIs are significant.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to examine the possibility of measuring efficiency in the context of higher education. The paper begins by exploring the advantages and drawbacks of the various methods for measuring efficiency in the higher education context. The ease with which data envelopment analysis (DEA) can handle multiple inputs and multiple outputs makes it an attractive choice of technique for measuring the efficiency of higher education institutions (HEIs), yet its drawbacks cannot be ignored. Thus, a number of extensions to the methodology, designed to overcome some of the disadvantages, are presented. The paper ends with an application of DEA to a data set of more than 100 HEIs in England using data for the year 2000/01. Technical and scale efficiency in the English higher education sector appear to be high on average. The Pastor, Ruiz, and Sirvent [2002. Operations Research, 50(4), 728-735] test for comparing nested DEA models is useful in reducing the full model to a smaller 'significant' set of inputs and outputs. Thus, the quantity and quality of undergraduates, the quantity of postgraduates, expenditure on administration, and the value of interest payments and depreciation are significant inputs to, and the quantity and quality of undergraduate degrees, the quantity of postgraduate degrees and research are significant outputs in the English higher education production process. The possibility of differences in the production frontier (and hence the distribution of efficiencies) of three distinct groups of HEIs is explored using a test proposed by Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes [1981. Management Science, 27(6), 668-697] but no significant differences are found. Bootstrapping procedures, however, suggest that differences between the most and least efficient English HEIs are significant.

KW - Data envelopment analysis

KW - Efficiency measurement

KW - Higher education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745040948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.005

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 273

EP - 288

JO - Economics of Education Review

JF - Economics of Education Review

SN - 0272-7757

IS - 3

ER -