Deconvolution in astronomy

A review

J. L. Starck, E. Pantin, F. Murtagh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

252 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews different deconvolution methods. The all-pervasive presence of noise is what makes deconvolution particularly difficult. The diversity of resulting algorithms reflects different ways of estimating the true signal under various idealizations of its properties. Different ways of approaching signal recovery are based on different instrumental noise models, whether the astronomical objects are pointlike or extended, and indeed on the computational resources available to the analyst. We present a number of recent results in this survey of signal restoration, including in the areas of superresolution and dithering. In particular, we show that most recent published work has consisted of incorporating some form of multiresolution in the deconvolution process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1051-1069
Number of pages19
JournalPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
Volume114
Issue number800
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

deconvolution
astronomy
restoration
resources
estimating
recovery
resource

Cite this

Starck, J. L. ; Pantin, E. ; Murtagh, F. / Deconvolution in astronomy : A review. In: Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 2002 ; Vol. 114, No. 800. pp. 1051-1069.
@article{354d3d0bb9c345288a83b0e0b0b9696f,
title = "Deconvolution in astronomy: A review",
abstract = "This article reviews different deconvolution methods. The all-pervasive presence of noise is what makes deconvolution particularly difficult. The diversity of resulting algorithms reflects different ways of estimating the true signal under various idealizations of its properties. Different ways of approaching signal recovery are based on different instrumental noise models, whether the astronomical objects are pointlike or extended, and indeed on the computational resources available to the analyst. We present a number of recent results in this survey of signal restoration, including in the areas of superresolution and dithering. In particular, we show that most recent published work has consisted of incorporating some form of multiresolution in the deconvolution process.",
author = "Starck, {J. L.} and E. Pantin and F. Murtagh",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/342606",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "1051--1069",
journal = "Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific",
issn = "0004-6280",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "800",

}

Deconvolution in astronomy : A review. / Starck, J. L.; Pantin, E.; Murtagh, F.

In: Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 114, No. 800, 01.12.2002, p. 1051-1069.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deconvolution in astronomy

T2 - A review

AU - Starck, J. L.

AU - Pantin, E.

AU - Murtagh, F.

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - This article reviews different deconvolution methods. The all-pervasive presence of noise is what makes deconvolution particularly difficult. The diversity of resulting algorithms reflects different ways of estimating the true signal under various idealizations of its properties. Different ways of approaching signal recovery are based on different instrumental noise models, whether the astronomical objects are pointlike or extended, and indeed on the computational resources available to the analyst. We present a number of recent results in this survey of signal restoration, including in the areas of superresolution and dithering. In particular, we show that most recent published work has consisted of incorporating some form of multiresolution in the deconvolution process.

AB - This article reviews different deconvolution methods. The all-pervasive presence of noise is what makes deconvolution particularly difficult. The diversity of resulting algorithms reflects different ways of estimating the true signal under various idealizations of its properties. Different ways of approaching signal recovery are based on different instrumental noise models, whether the astronomical objects are pointlike or extended, and indeed on the computational resources available to the analyst. We present a number of recent results in this survey of signal restoration, including in the areas of superresolution and dithering. In particular, we show that most recent published work has consisted of incorporating some form of multiresolution in the deconvolution process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036406981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/342606

DO - 10.1086/342606

M3 - Review article

VL - 114

SP - 1051

EP - 1069

JO - Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

JF - Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

SN - 0004-6280

IS - 800

ER -