Defining and computing machine tool accuracy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding machine tool performance is important for specifying or comparing machines and for determining capability for production. Machine accuracy has generally been described by the linear positioning accuracy and repeatability of the axes. This specification neglects all other geometric effects such as angular, straightness and squareness errors which can have a significant effect upon the true precision capability of such machines. A more comprehensive way to define a machine's precision would be to specify the accuracy for the full working volume of a machine tool, i.e. the Volumetric Accuracy (VA) taking into account all geometric errors. Existing methods for describing the volumetric accuracy recognised by the standards organisations are the diagonal and step-diagonal methods. These are designed, in part, to be rapid to reduce machine downtime but compromise accuracy and extensibility if used in isolation. The reduction in accuracy is described in detail in the ISO standard 230 part 6 [1]. This paper describes a definition of VA and a methodology for calculating and reporting the performance of a 3-axis cartesian machine tool that significantly reduces ambiguity compared to other methods and supports a broader range of performance assessments. Error measurement methods are discussed with respect to accuracy and test time. An example model is discussed highlighting the ease with which 3D positioning error can be calculated then methods for efficiently determining the proposed volumetric accuracy. The method is extensible in that the data and model describe the machine volume completely and therefore enables a variety of performance assessments for machine comparison or process capability. Examples are provided showing the difference in accuracy using variable volume assessments and also an example part profile. The method also enables easy calculation of the percentage contribution of each geometric component at the volume positions most affecting the volumetric accuracy enabling targeted correction with maximum performance benefit.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLaser Metrology and Machine Performance IX
Subtitle of host publication9th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance, LAMDAMAP 2009
EditorsK. Cheng
Publishereuspen
Pages77-86
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9780955308277
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2009
Event9th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance - Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Duration: 30 Jun 20092 Jul 2009
Conference number: 9

Conference

Conference9th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance
Abbreviated titleLAMDAMAP 2009
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityUxbridge
Period30/06/092/07/09

Fingerprint

machine tools
Machine tools
Measurement errors
Specifications
positioning
downtime
ambiguity
specifications
isolation

Cite this

Fletcher, S., Longstaff, A., & Myers, A. (2009). Defining and computing machine tool accuracy. In K. Cheng (Ed.), Laser Metrology and Machine Performance IX : 9th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance, LAMDAMAP 2009 (pp. 77-86). euspen.
Fletcher, S. ; Longstaff, A. ; Myers, A. / Defining and computing machine tool accuracy. Laser Metrology and Machine Performance IX : 9th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance, LAMDAMAP 2009. editor / K. Cheng. euspen, 2009. pp. 77-86
@inproceedings{a960bae02caa4f31aad4e91453b8a7a0,
title = "Defining and computing machine tool accuracy",
abstract = "Understanding machine tool performance is important for specifying or comparing machines and for determining capability for production. Machine accuracy has generally been described by the linear positioning accuracy and repeatability of the axes. This specification neglects all other geometric effects such as angular, straightness and squareness errors which can have a significant effect upon the true precision capability of such machines. A more comprehensive way to define a machine's precision would be to specify the accuracy for the full working volume of a machine tool, i.e. the Volumetric Accuracy (VA) taking into account all geometric errors. Existing methods for describing the volumetric accuracy recognised by the standards organisations are the diagonal and step-diagonal methods. These are designed, in part, to be rapid to reduce machine downtime but compromise accuracy and extensibility if used in isolation. The reduction in accuracy is described in detail in the ISO standard 230 part 6 [1]. This paper describes a definition of VA and a methodology for calculating and reporting the performance of a 3-axis cartesian machine tool that significantly reduces ambiguity compared to other methods and supports a broader range of performance assessments. Error measurement methods are discussed with respect to accuracy and test time. An example model is discussed highlighting the ease with which 3D positioning error can be calculated then methods for efficiently determining the proposed volumetric accuracy. The method is extensible in that the data and model describe the machine volume completely and therefore enables a variety of performance assessments for machine comparison or process capability. Examples are provided showing the difference in accuracy using variable volume assessments and also an example part profile. The method also enables easy calculation of the percentage contribution of each geometric component at the volume positions most affecting the volumetric accuracy enabling targeted correction with maximum performance benefit.",
keywords = "machine tools, errors, thermal errors",
author = "S. Fletcher and A. Longstaff and A. Myers",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "77--86",
editor = "K. Cheng",
booktitle = "Laser Metrology and Machine Performance IX",
publisher = "euspen",

}

Fletcher, S, Longstaff, A & Myers, A 2009, Defining and computing machine tool accuracy. in K Cheng (ed.), Laser Metrology and Machine Performance IX : 9th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance, LAMDAMAP 2009. euspen, pp. 77-86, 9th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance, Uxbridge, United Kingdom, 30/06/09.

Defining and computing machine tool accuracy. / Fletcher, S.; Longstaff, A.; Myers, A.

Laser Metrology and Machine Performance IX : 9th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance, LAMDAMAP 2009. ed. / K. Cheng. euspen, 2009. p. 77-86.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Defining and computing machine tool accuracy

AU - Fletcher, S.

AU - Longstaff, A.

AU - Myers, A.

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - Understanding machine tool performance is important for specifying or comparing machines and for determining capability for production. Machine accuracy has generally been described by the linear positioning accuracy and repeatability of the axes. This specification neglects all other geometric effects such as angular, straightness and squareness errors which can have a significant effect upon the true precision capability of such machines. A more comprehensive way to define a machine's precision would be to specify the accuracy for the full working volume of a machine tool, i.e. the Volumetric Accuracy (VA) taking into account all geometric errors. Existing methods for describing the volumetric accuracy recognised by the standards organisations are the diagonal and step-diagonal methods. These are designed, in part, to be rapid to reduce machine downtime but compromise accuracy and extensibility if used in isolation. The reduction in accuracy is described in detail in the ISO standard 230 part 6 [1]. This paper describes a definition of VA and a methodology for calculating and reporting the performance of a 3-axis cartesian machine tool that significantly reduces ambiguity compared to other methods and supports a broader range of performance assessments. Error measurement methods are discussed with respect to accuracy and test time. An example model is discussed highlighting the ease with which 3D positioning error can be calculated then methods for efficiently determining the proposed volumetric accuracy. The method is extensible in that the data and model describe the machine volume completely and therefore enables a variety of performance assessments for machine comparison or process capability. Examples are provided showing the difference in accuracy using variable volume assessments and also an example part profile. The method also enables easy calculation of the percentage contribution of each geometric component at the volume positions most affecting the volumetric accuracy enabling targeted correction with maximum performance benefit.

AB - Understanding machine tool performance is important for specifying or comparing machines and for determining capability for production. Machine accuracy has generally been described by the linear positioning accuracy and repeatability of the axes. This specification neglects all other geometric effects such as angular, straightness and squareness errors which can have a significant effect upon the true precision capability of such machines. A more comprehensive way to define a machine's precision would be to specify the accuracy for the full working volume of a machine tool, i.e. the Volumetric Accuracy (VA) taking into account all geometric errors. Existing methods for describing the volumetric accuracy recognised by the standards organisations are the diagonal and step-diagonal methods. These are designed, in part, to be rapid to reduce machine downtime but compromise accuracy and extensibility if used in isolation. The reduction in accuracy is described in detail in the ISO standard 230 part 6 [1]. This paper describes a definition of VA and a methodology for calculating and reporting the performance of a 3-axis cartesian machine tool that significantly reduces ambiguity compared to other methods and supports a broader range of performance assessments. Error measurement methods are discussed with respect to accuracy and test time. An example model is discussed highlighting the ease with which 3D positioning error can be calculated then methods for efficiently determining the proposed volumetric accuracy. The method is extensible in that the data and model describe the machine volume completely and therefore enables a variety of performance assessments for machine comparison or process capability. Examples are provided showing the difference in accuracy using variable volume assessments and also an example part profile. The method also enables easy calculation of the percentage contribution of each geometric component at the volume positions most affecting the volumetric accuracy enabling targeted correction with maximum performance benefit.

KW - machine tools

KW - errors

KW - thermal errors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908285567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 77

EP - 86

BT - Laser Metrology and Machine Performance IX

A2 - Cheng, K.

PB - euspen

ER -

Fletcher S, Longstaff A, Myers A. Defining and computing machine tool accuracy. In Cheng K, editor, Laser Metrology and Machine Performance IX : 9th International Conference and Exhibition on Laser Metrology, Machine Tool, CMM and Robotic Performance, LAMDAMAP 2009. euspen. 2009. p. 77-86