Abstract
A recent series of cases relating to the EU motor vehicle insurance directives and their application in the UK makes for interesting reading. It is in the UK’s negligent transposition, and a lack of knowledge and awareness by lawyers and judges in the cases of the interaction between domestic and EU law, which compounds the negative effects. The issues raised in Delaney v Pickett [2011] and Delaney v Secretary of State [2014] generate concern not just as to the implications they have to the application of EU law principles, but have resonance with the way in which EU law is taught in many universities. In this article we suggest that reconsidering the method and purpose of EU teaching may better serve the EU-lawyers needed for the future.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 411-427 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Law Teacher |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 25 Aug 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Delaney and the Motor Vehicle Insurance Directives: Lessons for the teaching of EU law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver