Dependency denied: Health inequalities in the neo-liberal era

Marian Peacock, Paul Bissell, Jenny Owen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ways in which inequality generates particular population health outcomes remains a major source of dispute within social epidemiology and medical sociology. Wilkinson and Pickett's The Spirit Level (2009), undoubtedly galvanised thinking across the disciplines, with its emphasis on how income inequality shapes the distribution of health and social problems. In this paper, we argue that their focus on income inequality, whilst important, understates the role of neoliberal discourses and practises in making sense of contemporary inequality and its health-related consequences. Many quantitative studies have demonstrated that more neoliberal countries have poorer health compared to less neoliberal countries, but there are few qualitative studies which explore how neoliberal discourses shape accounts and experiences and what protections and resources might be available to people. This article uses findings from a qualitative psycho-socialstudy employing biographical-narrative interviews with women in Salford (England) to understand experiences of inequality as posited in The Spirit Level. We found evidence for the sorts of damages resulting from inequality as proposed in The Spirit Level. However, in addition to these, the most striking finding was the repeated articulation of a discourse which we have termed ". no legitimate dependency". This was something both painful and damaging, where dependency of almost any sort was disavowed and responsibility was assumed by the self or "othered" in various ways. No legitimate dependency, we propose, is a partial (and problematic) internalisation of neoliberal discourses which becomes naturalised and unquestioned at the individual level. We speculate that these sorts of discourses in conjunction with a destruction of protective resources (both material and discursive), lead to an increase in strain and account in part for well-known damages consequent on life in an unequal society. We conclude that integrating understandings of neoliberalism into theorising about inequality enriches sociological perspectives in this area.

LanguageEnglish
Pages173-180
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume118
Early online date7 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
health
discourse
damages
Medical Sociology
medical sociology
narrative interview
income
Dissent and Disputes
Ego
internalization
Social Problems
epidemiology
Dependency (Psychology)
neoliberalism
resources
England
experience
Epidemiology
Discourse

Cite this

Peacock, Marian ; Bissell, Paul ; Owen, Jenny. / Dependency denied : Health inequalities in the neo-liberal era. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 118. pp. 173-180.
@article{b1c6cf41bb21466a9842dcca8c69262c,
title = "Dependency denied: Health inequalities in the neo-liberal era",
abstract = "The ways in which inequality generates particular population health outcomes remains a major source of dispute within social epidemiology and medical sociology. Wilkinson and Pickett's The Spirit Level (2009), undoubtedly galvanised thinking across the disciplines, with its emphasis on how income inequality shapes the distribution of health and social problems. In this paper, we argue that their focus on income inequality, whilst important, understates the role of neoliberal discourses and practises in making sense of contemporary inequality and its health-related consequences. Many quantitative studies have demonstrated that more neoliberal countries have poorer health compared to less neoliberal countries, but there are few qualitative studies which explore how neoliberal discourses shape accounts and experiences and what protections and resources might be available to people. This article uses findings from a qualitative psycho-socialstudy employing biographical-narrative interviews with women in Salford (England) to understand experiences of inequality as posited in The Spirit Level. We found evidence for the sorts of damages resulting from inequality as proposed in The Spirit Level. However, in addition to these, the most striking finding was the repeated articulation of a discourse which we have termed {"}. no legitimate dependency{"}. This was something both painful and damaging, where dependency of almost any sort was disavowed and responsibility was assumed by the self or {"}othered{"} in various ways. No legitimate dependency, we propose, is a partial (and problematic) internalisation of neoliberal discourses which becomes naturalised and unquestioned at the individual level. We speculate that these sorts of discourses in conjunction with a destruction of protective resources (both material and discursive), lead to an increase in strain and account in part for well-known damages consequent on life in an unequal society. We conclude that integrating understandings of neoliberalism into theorising about inequality enriches sociological perspectives in this area.",
keywords = "Discourses, Health inequality, Neoliberalism, No legitimate dependency, Shame, Social comparison, United Kingdom, Women's lives",
author = "Marian Peacock and Paul Bissell and Jenny Owen",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.006",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "173--180",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Dependency denied : Health inequalities in the neo-liberal era. / Peacock, Marian; Bissell, Paul; Owen, Jenny.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 118, 01.10.2014, p. 173-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dependency denied

T2 - Social Science and Medicine

AU - Peacock, Marian

AU - Bissell, Paul

AU - Owen, Jenny

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - The ways in which inequality generates particular population health outcomes remains a major source of dispute within social epidemiology and medical sociology. Wilkinson and Pickett's The Spirit Level (2009), undoubtedly galvanised thinking across the disciplines, with its emphasis on how income inequality shapes the distribution of health and social problems. In this paper, we argue that their focus on income inequality, whilst important, understates the role of neoliberal discourses and practises in making sense of contemporary inequality and its health-related consequences. Many quantitative studies have demonstrated that more neoliberal countries have poorer health compared to less neoliberal countries, but there are few qualitative studies which explore how neoliberal discourses shape accounts and experiences and what protections and resources might be available to people. This article uses findings from a qualitative psycho-socialstudy employing biographical-narrative interviews with women in Salford (England) to understand experiences of inequality as posited in The Spirit Level. We found evidence for the sorts of damages resulting from inequality as proposed in The Spirit Level. However, in addition to these, the most striking finding was the repeated articulation of a discourse which we have termed ". no legitimate dependency". This was something both painful and damaging, where dependency of almost any sort was disavowed and responsibility was assumed by the self or "othered" in various ways. No legitimate dependency, we propose, is a partial (and problematic) internalisation of neoliberal discourses which becomes naturalised and unquestioned at the individual level. We speculate that these sorts of discourses in conjunction with a destruction of protective resources (both material and discursive), lead to an increase in strain and account in part for well-known damages consequent on life in an unequal society. We conclude that integrating understandings of neoliberalism into theorising about inequality enriches sociological perspectives in this area.

AB - The ways in which inequality generates particular population health outcomes remains a major source of dispute within social epidemiology and medical sociology. Wilkinson and Pickett's The Spirit Level (2009), undoubtedly galvanised thinking across the disciplines, with its emphasis on how income inequality shapes the distribution of health and social problems. In this paper, we argue that their focus on income inequality, whilst important, understates the role of neoliberal discourses and practises in making sense of contemporary inequality and its health-related consequences. Many quantitative studies have demonstrated that more neoliberal countries have poorer health compared to less neoliberal countries, but there are few qualitative studies which explore how neoliberal discourses shape accounts and experiences and what protections and resources might be available to people. This article uses findings from a qualitative psycho-socialstudy employing biographical-narrative interviews with women in Salford (England) to understand experiences of inequality as posited in The Spirit Level. We found evidence for the sorts of damages resulting from inequality as proposed in The Spirit Level. However, in addition to these, the most striking finding was the repeated articulation of a discourse which we have termed ". no legitimate dependency". This was something both painful and damaging, where dependency of almost any sort was disavowed and responsibility was assumed by the self or "othered" in various ways. No legitimate dependency, we propose, is a partial (and problematic) internalisation of neoliberal discourses which becomes naturalised and unquestioned at the individual level. We speculate that these sorts of discourses in conjunction with a destruction of protective resources (both material and discursive), lead to an increase in strain and account in part for well-known damages consequent on life in an unequal society. We conclude that integrating understandings of neoliberalism into theorising about inequality enriches sociological perspectives in this area.

KW - Discourses

KW - Health inequality

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - No legitimate dependency

KW - Shame

KW - Social comparison

KW - United Kingdom

KW - Women's lives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927160650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.006

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 173

EP - 180

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -