Designing as a court of law

Lauri Koskela, Paz Arroyo, Glenn Ballard

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

It is contended that legal proceedings, as they have evolved from Antiquity onwards, embrace important and effective principles for collaborative competition in pursuit of a common goal, in the considered context, justice. Seven principles contributing to this goal can be recognised: “hear both parties”, reasoned judgment, right to appeal, use of both logical and rhetorical arguments and reasoning, standardized proceedings and documents, public nature of proceedings, as well as dedicated and structured space.
It is contended that the court of law can be used as a metaphor of what is happening in design. There are wishes, concepts and solutions competing against each other. For reaching the best outcome, each wish, concept or solution needs to be promoted and defended in the best possible way, and a reasoned judgment among them has to be done. Then, the question arises whether the seven principles found in legal proceedings have relevance for this collaborative, yet competitive pursuit of a common goal in design, namely the best solution in view of customer requirements.
For initial exploration of the relevance and validity of the seven principles in design, a case study was undertaken. It turns out that all the seven principles are being implemented. The outcomes of the project are clearly better than in projects managed in the traditional way; although it is not possible to trace back the benefits only to the collaborative principles and related practices, their emergence, and continued use, provide solid circumstantial evidence on their efficacy.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationProc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)
EditorsV.A. González
Place of PublicationChennai, India.
Number of pages10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

legal proceedings
Law
antiquity
metaphor
appeal
customer
justice
evidence

Cite this

Koskela, L., Arroyo, P., & Ballard, G. (2018). Designing as a court of law. In V. A. González (Ed.), Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC) [513] Chennai, India.. https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0513
Koskela, Lauri ; Arroyo, Paz ; Ballard, Glenn. / Designing as a court of law. Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). editor / V.A. González. Chennai, India., 2018.
@inproceedings{c4f0fb295968420fb225340d5369175e,
title = "Designing as a court of law",
abstract = "It is contended that legal proceedings, as they have evolved from Antiquity onwards, embrace important and effective principles for collaborative competition in pursuit of a common goal, in the considered context, justice. Seven principles contributing to this goal can be recognised: “hear both parties”, reasoned judgment, right to appeal, use of both logical and rhetorical arguments and reasoning, standardized proceedings and documents, public nature of proceedings, as well as dedicated and structured space. It is contended that the court of law can be used as a metaphor of what is happening in design. There are wishes, concepts and solutions competing against each other. For reaching the best outcome, each wish, concept or solution needs to be promoted and defended in the best possible way, and a reasoned judgment among them has to be done. Then, the question arises whether the seven principles found in legal proceedings have relevance for this collaborative, yet competitive pursuit of a common goal in design, namely the best solution in view of customer requirements.For initial exploration of the relevance and validity of the seven principles in design, a case study was undertaken. It turns out that all the seven principles are being implemented. The outcomes of the project are clearly better than in projects managed in the traditional way; although it is not possible to trace back the benefits only to the collaborative principles and related practices, their emergence, and continued use, provide solid circumstantial evidence on their efficacy.",
keywords = "lean construction, Collaborative design, competition, design management, communication, legal proceedings",
author = "Lauri Koskela and Paz Arroyo and Glenn Ballard",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "18",
doi = "10.24928/2018/0513",
language = "English",
editor = "V.A. Gonz{\'a}lez",
booktitle = "Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)",

}

Koskela, L, Arroyo, P & Ballard, G 2018, Designing as a court of law. in VA González (ed.), Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)., 513, Chennai, India. https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0513

Designing as a court of law. / Koskela, Lauri; Arroyo, Paz; Ballard, Glenn.

Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). ed. / V.A. González. Chennai, India., 2018. 513.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Designing as a court of law

AU - Koskela,Lauri

AU - Arroyo,Paz

AU - Ballard,Glenn

PY - 2018/7/18

Y1 - 2018/7/18

N2 - It is contended that legal proceedings, as they have evolved from Antiquity onwards, embrace important and effective principles for collaborative competition in pursuit of a common goal, in the considered context, justice. Seven principles contributing to this goal can be recognised: “hear both parties”, reasoned judgment, right to appeal, use of both logical and rhetorical arguments and reasoning, standardized proceedings and documents, public nature of proceedings, as well as dedicated and structured space. It is contended that the court of law can be used as a metaphor of what is happening in design. There are wishes, concepts and solutions competing against each other. For reaching the best outcome, each wish, concept or solution needs to be promoted and defended in the best possible way, and a reasoned judgment among them has to be done. Then, the question arises whether the seven principles found in legal proceedings have relevance for this collaborative, yet competitive pursuit of a common goal in design, namely the best solution in view of customer requirements.For initial exploration of the relevance and validity of the seven principles in design, a case study was undertaken. It turns out that all the seven principles are being implemented. The outcomes of the project are clearly better than in projects managed in the traditional way; although it is not possible to trace back the benefits only to the collaborative principles and related practices, their emergence, and continued use, provide solid circumstantial evidence on their efficacy.

AB - It is contended that legal proceedings, as they have evolved from Antiquity onwards, embrace important and effective principles for collaborative competition in pursuit of a common goal, in the considered context, justice. Seven principles contributing to this goal can be recognised: “hear both parties”, reasoned judgment, right to appeal, use of both logical and rhetorical arguments and reasoning, standardized proceedings and documents, public nature of proceedings, as well as dedicated and structured space. It is contended that the court of law can be used as a metaphor of what is happening in design. There are wishes, concepts and solutions competing against each other. For reaching the best outcome, each wish, concept or solution needs to be promoted and defended in the best possible way, and a reasoned judgment among them has to be done. Then, the question arises whether the seven principles found in legal proceedings have relevance for this collaborative, yet competitive pursuit of a common goal in design, namely the best solution in view of customer requirements.For initial exploration of the relevance and validity of the seven principles in design, a case study was undertaken. It turns out that all the seven principles are being implemented. The outcomes of the project are clearly better than in projects managed in the traditional way; although it is not possible to trace back the benefits only to the collaborative principles and related practices, their emergence, and continued use, provide solid circumstantial evidence on their efficacy.

KW - lean construction

KW - Collaborative design

KW - competition

KW - design management

KW - communication

KW - legal proceedings

UR - http://www.iglc.net

U2 - 10.24928/2018/0513

DO - 10.24928/2018/0513

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)

CY - Chennai, India.

ER -

Koskela L, Arroyo P, Ballard G. Designing as a court of law. In González VA, editor, Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). Chennai, India. 2018. 513 https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0513