Abstract
It is contended that the court of law can be used as a metaphor of what is happening in design. There are wishes, concepts and solutions competing against each other. For reaching the best outcome, each wish, concept or solution needs to be promoted and defended in the best possible way, and a reasoned judgment among them has to be done. Then, the question arises whether the seven principles found in legal proceedings have relevance for this collaborative, yet competitive pursuit of a common goal in design, namely the best solution in view of customer requirements.
For initial exploration of the relevance and validity of the seven principles in design, a case study was undertaken. It turns out that all the seven principles are being implemented. The outcomes of the project are clearly better than in projects managed in the traditional way; although it is not possible to trace back the benefits only to the collaborative principles and related practices, their emergence, and continued use, provide solid circumstantial evidence on their efficacy.
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC) |
| Editors | V.A. González |
| Place of Publication | Chennai, India. |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Jul 2018 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Designing as a court of law. / Koskela, Lauri; Arroyo, Paz; Ballard, Glenn.
Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). ed. / V.A. González. Chennai, India., 2018. 513.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
TY - GEN
T1 - Designing as a court of law
AU - Koskela, Lauri
AU - Arroyo, Paz
AU - Ballard, Glenn
PY - 2018/7/18
Y1 - 2018/7/18
N2 - It is contended that legal proceedings, as they have evolved from Antiquity onwards, embrace important and effective principles for collaborative competition in pursuit of a common goal, in the considered context, justice. Seven principles contributing to this goal can be recognised: “hear both parties”, reasoned judgment, right to appeal, use of both logical and rhetorical arguments and reasoning, standardized proceedings and documents, public nature of proceedings, as well as dedicated and structured space. It is contended that the court of law can be used as a metaphor of what is happening in design. There are wishes, concepts and solutions competing against each other. For reaching the best outcome, each wish, concept or solution needs to be promoted and defended in the best possible way, and a reasoned judgment among them has to be done. Then, the question arises whether the seven principles found in legal proceedings have relevance for this collaborative, yet competitive pursuit of a common goal in design, namely the best solution in view of customer requirements.For initial exploration of the relevance and validity of the seven principles in design, a case study was undertaken. It turns out that all the seven principles are being implemented. The outcomes of the project are clearly better than in projects managed in the traditional way; although it is not possible to trace back the benefits only to the collaborative principles and related practices, their emergence, and continued use, provide solid circumstantial evidence on their efficacy.
AB - It is contended that legal proceedings, as they have evolved from Antiquity onwards, embrace important and effective principles for collaborative competition in pursuit of a common goal, in the considered context, justice. Seven principles contributing to this goal can be recognised: “hear both parties”, reasoned judgment, right to appeal, use of both logical and rhetorical arguments and reasoning, standardized proceedings and documents, public nature of proceedings, as well as dedicated and structured space. It is contended that the court of law can be used as a metaphor of what is happening in design. There are wishes, concepts and solutions competing against each other. For reaching the best outcome, each wish, concept or solution needs to be promoted and defended in the best possible way, and a reasoned judgment among them has to be done. Then, the question arises whether the seven principles found in legal proceedings have relevance for this collaborative, yet competitive pursuit of a common goal in design, namely the best solution in view of customer requirements.For initial exploration of the relevance and validity of the seven principles in design, a case study was undertaken. It turns out that all the seven principles are being implemented. The outcomes of the project are clearly better than in projects managed in the traditional way; although it is not possible to trace back the benefits only to the collaborative principles and related practices, their emergence, and continued use, provide solid circumstantial evidence on their efficacy.
KW - lean construction
KW - Collaborative design
KW - competition
KW - design management
KW - communication
KW - legal proceedings
UR - http://www.iglc.net
U2 - 10.24928/2018/0513
DO - 10.24928/2018/0513
M3 - Conference contribution
BT - Proc. 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)
A2 - González, V.A.
CY - Chennai, India.
ER -