Abstract
Aims: A range of peer worker roles are being introduced into mental health services internationally. There is some evidence that attests to the benefits of peer workers for the people they support but formal trial evidence in inconclusive, in part because the change model underpinning peer support-based interventions is underdeveloped. Complex intervention evaluation guidance suggests that understandings of how an intervention is associated with change in outcomes should be modelled, theoretically and empirically, before the intervention can be robustly evaluated. This paper aims to model the change mechanisms underlying peer worker interventions.
Methods: In a qualitative, comparative case study of ten peer worker initiatives in statutory and voluntary sector mental health services in England in-depth interviews were carried out with 71 peer workers, service users, staff and managers, exploring their experiences of peer working. Using a Grounded Theory approach we identified core processes within the peer worker role that were productive of change for service users supported by peer workers.
Results: Key change mechanisms were: (i) building trusting relationships based on shared lived experience; (ii) rolemodelling individual recovery and living well with mental health problems; (iii) engaging service users with mental health services and the community. Mechanisms could be further explained by theoretical literature on role-modelling and relationship in mental health services. We were able to model process and downstream outcomes potentially associated with peer worker interventions.
Conclusions: An empirically and theoretically grounded change model can be articulated that usefully informs the
development, evaluation and planning of peer worker interventions.
Methods: In a qualitative, comparative case study of ten peer worker initiatives in statutory and voluntary sector mental health services in England in-depth interviews were carried out with 71 peer workers, service users, staff and managers, exploring their experiences of peer working. Using a Grounded Theory approach we identified core processes within the peer worker role that were productive of change for service users supported by peer workers.
Results: Key change mechanisms were: (i) building trusting relationships based on shared lived experience; (ii) rolemodelling individual recovery and living well with mental health problems; (iii) engaging service users with mental health services and the community. Mechanisms could be further explained by theoretical literature on role-modelling and relationship in mental health services. We were able to model process and downstream outcomes potentially associated with peer worker interventions.
Conclusions: An empirically and theoretically grounded change model can be articulated that usefully informs the
development, evaluation and planning of peer worker interventions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 435-445 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 3 Jul 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |